Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A survey of Estonian consumer expectations from the pharmacy service and a comparison with the opinions of pharmacists

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Pharmacy World & Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the preferences of pharmacy customers when choosing a pharmacy and their expectations of the service, and␣comparing these with the opinions of pharmacists.

Main outcome measure

Opinion and satisfaction of community pharmacy clients in Estonia.

Methods

A written survey was carried out among pharmacy customers (n=1979) in cities (in 3 community pharmacies), towns (in 2 community pharmacies), and in small towns (in 2 community pharmacies). The survey was also carried out among community pharmacists (n=135) in different regions of Estonia.

Results

When choosing a pharmacy, its location was considered most important, costs and wide choice are less important. The most important expectations of customers’ included help choosing the right medicine, as well as professional consultation. Preferences and expectations of pharmacy customers depended on their age, gender and income. Parking space, quickness and pleasantness were considered important by men. Costs and wide choice were considered to be more important by women. Pharmacists wish to give patients more information, but they overestimate the importance of quick service. Customers favoured privacy, discretion and confidentiality more. These characteristics were especially important to younger well-paid people living in big cities.

Conclusion

In contrast to the opinions offered by pharmacists’, a rapid customer service is so not as important as the quality of service in pharmacy according to customers. They also emphasised that pharmacies should highlight the choice of products, quality of service, a professional consultation, as well as ensure privacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Volmer D, Raal A, Tammaru TM. Medicines policy and pharmacy system in Estonia. Dosis 2003;3:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bissell P, Ward PR, Noyce PR. Variation within community pharmacy. 3. Referring customers to other health professionals. J Soc Adm Pharm 1997;14(2):116–123

    Google Scholar 

  3. Volmer D. Apteekri rollist tavainimese informeerimisel kergematest haigustest ja käsimüügiravimitest (Information given by pharmacists to the lay people concerning minor illnesses and OTC- edicines.). Apteeker 2004;4(11):6–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reebye EN, Avery AJ, Bissell P, Weel CV. The issue of territoriality between pharmacists and physicians in primary care. Int J Pharm Pract 2002;10:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  5. Janno R, Raal A, Arak E. The opinion, attitudes and wishes of pharmacy customers in Tartu. Research in Medicine. Proceedings of the Meeting, Tartu; 1994; p. 27

  6. Bleiker P, Lewis A. Extending the role of community pharmacists: the views of GPs. Int J Pharm Pract 1998; 6:140–144

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tammaru TM, Volmer D, Raal A. Estonian community pharmacies—pharmaceutical services and patient satisfaction. J Soc and Admin Pharm 2003;5:82–186

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tam VHY, Lim MM. Patients’ perceptions and expectations of outpatient pharmacy services in a teaching hospital. Int J Pharm Pract 1997;5:128–132

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abu-Omar SM, Weiss MC, Hassell K. Pharmacists and their customers: a personal or anonymous service? Int J Pharm Pract 2000;8:135–143

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zelnio RN, Nelson AA Jr, Beno CE. Clinical pharmaceutical services in retail practice. I. Pharmacists’ willingness and abilities to provide services. Drug Intel Clin Pharm 1984;18(11):917–922

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Savage I. The changing face of pharmacy practice—evidence from 20 years of work sampling studies. Int J Pharm Pract 1999;7:09–219

    Google Scholar 

  12. Williams SE, Bond CM, Menzies C. A pharmaceutical needs assessment in primary care setting. Br J Gen Pract 2000;50(451):95–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson C. Health promotion in community pharmacy: the UK situation. Patient Educ and Couns 2000;29(2–3): 285–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitehead P, Atkin P, Krass I, Benrimoj SI. Patient drug information and consumer choice of pharmacy. Int J Pharm Pract 1999;7:71–79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge all students who helped carry out the survey and to all the pharmacists involved for their kind co-operation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. K-Büroo Marketing Oü, 112/2 Kalevi Street, Tartu, 50104, Estonia

    Peeter Villako

  2. Institute of Pharmacy, University of Tartu, 1 Nooruse Street, Tartu, 50411, Estonia

    Ain Raal

Authors
  1. Peeter Villako
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ain Raal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peeter Villako.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Villako, P., Raal, A. A survey of Estonian consumer expectations from the pharmacy service and a comparison with the opinions of pharmacists. Pharm World Sci 29, 546–550 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-007-9102-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-007-9102-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation