Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Image Analysis Quantification of Sticking and Picking Events of Pharmaceutical Powders Compressed on a Rotary Tablet Press Simulator

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Purpose

The aim of this work was to develop a quantification method based on image analysis, able to characterize sticking during pharmaceutical tableting. Relationship between image analysis features and relevant mechanical parameters recorded on an instrumented tablet press simulator were investigated.

Methods

Image analysis, based on gray levels co-occurrence matrices (GLCM), generated textural features of the tablet surface. The tableting simulator (Stylcam® 200R, Medelpharm), instrumented with force and displacement transducers, provided accurate records. The tablet defects and compaction process parameters were studied using three pharmaceutical powders (Fast-Flo® lactose, anhydrous Emcompress® and Avicel® PH200 microcrystalline cellulose), five compression pressures (60 to 250 MPa), five lubricating levels, and three types of punches (standard steel, amorphous hard carbon and anti-sticking punches).

Results

Texture parameters made it possible to quantify with precision tablets’ aspect. The selected parameter IC2 (Information on Correlation 2) plotted versus the ratio between the ejection shear stress (Esh) and the compression pressure (Cp) let appear a relevant knowledge space where it was possible to identify a normal and a degraded tableting mode. A positive link between those two parameters was shown.

Conclusion

Since the Esh/Cp ratio was related to image analysis results, it proved to be an interesting defect tag.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some series have not been represented because their attached result did not make sense. For instance, low pressures series of Emcompress® had high values of IC2, not because the tablets were degraded, but because the individual particles of powder were still visible due to the low pressure, mimicking a kind of roughness, not linked to a defect (27). Indeed, Emcompress® had big, and brittle particles. This phenomenon appeared for some Avicel® series too (see Table I).

Abbreviations

AHC:

amorphous hard carbon

API:

active pharmaceutical ingredient

AS:

anti sticking

Cp:

compression pressure

Ent:

entropy parameter

Esh:

ejection shear stress

GLCM:

gray level co-occurrence matrix

IC2:

information on correlation 2

StdStl:

standard steel

WTA:

wavelet texture analysis

REFERENCES

  1. Robert J-L. ASEAN training on ICH Q8/Q9/Q10 Guidelines: ICH [Internet]. ICH; 2010 [cited 2012 Mar 27]. Available from: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/Training/ICH_Endorsed_Training_Events/ASEAN_training_on_Q8_Q9_Q10_Guidelines/Q8_Pharma_development_JL.Robert.pdf

  2. Tousey MD. Sticking and picking: some causes and remedies. Tablets and Capsules. 2003 October.

  3. Brisson J, Genin M, Tabib N. Les défauts de fabrication des comprimés. Pharmaterm MD. 2006;17(2):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang JJ, Li T, Bateman SD, Erck R, Morris KR. Modeling of adhesion in tablet compression—I. Atomic force microscopy and molecular simulation. J Pharm Sci. 2003;92(4):798–814.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang JJ, Guillot MA, Bateman SD, Morris KR. Modeling of adhesion in tablet compression. II. Compaction studies using a compaction simulator and an instrumented tablet press. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93(2):407–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Waimer F, Krumme M, Danz P, Tenter U, Schmidt PC. A novel method for the detection of sticking of tablets. Pharm Dev Technol. 1999;4(3):359–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Danjo K, Kojima S, Chen CY, Sunada H, Otsuka A. Effect of water content on sticking during compression. Chem Pharm Bull. 1997;45(4):706–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Imbert C, Tchoreloff P, Leclerc B, Couarraze G. Indices of tableting performance and application of percolation theory to powder compaction. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1997;44(3):273–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vezin WR, Pang HM, Khan KA, Malkowska S. The effect of precompression in a rotary machine on tablet strength. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1983;9(8):1465–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kakimi K, Niwa T, Danjo K. Influence of compression pressure and velocity on tablet sticking. Chem Pharm Bull. 2010;58(12):1565–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Toyoshima K, Yasumura M, Ohnishi N, Ueda Y. Quantitative evaluation of tablet sticking by surface roughness measurement. Int J Pharm. 1988;46(3):211–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Danjo K, Kamiya K, Otsuka A. Effect of temperature on the sticking of low melting point materials. Chem Pharm Bull. 1993;41(8):1423–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Svensson O, Abrahamsson K, Engelbrektsson J, Nicholas M, Wikström H, Josefson M. An evaluation of 2D-wavelet filters for estimation of differences in textures of pharmaceutical tablets. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2006;84(1–2 SPEC. ISS):3–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. García-Muñoz S, Carmody A. Multivariate wavelet texture analysis for pharmaceutical solid product characterization. Int J Pharm. 2010;398(1–2):97–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levin M. Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Patel S, Kaushal AM, Bansal AK. Compression physics in the formulation development of tablets. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2006;23(1):1–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang J, Wen H, Desai D. Lubrication in tablet formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010;75(1):1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moody G, Rubinstein MH, FitzSimmons RA. Tablet lubricants I. Theory and modes of action. Int J Pharm. 1981;9(2):75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rowley FA. Tooling preparation practices and their effect on tablet picking. Pharm Technol Eur. 2005;17(10):42–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roberts M, Ford JL, MacLeod GS, Fell JT, Smith GW, Rowe PH. Effects of surface roughness and chrome plating of punch tips on the sticking tendencies of model ibuprofen formulations. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2003;55(9):1223–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pépin X. Évaluation de l'aptitude de pulvérulents aux transformations par granulation. Châtenay Malabry; 2000.

  22. Porion P, Busignies V, Mazel V, Leclerc B, Evesque P, Tchoreloff P. Anisotropic porous structure of pharmaceutical compacts evaluated by PGSTE-NMR in relation to mechanical property anisotropy. Pharm Res. 2010;27(10):2221–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Busignies V, Leclerc B, Truchon S, Tchoreloff P. Changes in the specific surface area of tablets composed of pharmaceutical materials with various deformation behaviors. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 2011;37(2):225–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu LX. Pharmaceutical quality by design: Product and process development, understanding, and control (Pharmaceutical Research doi:10.1007/s11095-007-9511-1). Pharm Res. 2008;25(10):2463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Michaut F, Busignies V, Fouquereau C, Huet De Barochez B, Leclerc B, Tchoreloff P. Evaluation of a rotary tablet press simulator as a tool for the characterization of compaction properties of pharmaceutical products. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99(6):2874–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1973;smc 3(6):610–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mazel V, Busignies V, Diarra H, Reiche I, Tchoreloff P. The surface layer of pharmaceutical compacts: the role of the punch surface and its impact on the mechanical properties of the compacts. Int J Pharm. 2013;442(1–2):42–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DISCLOSURES

The authors gratefully acknowledge Louis Henrion and Yves Collenot from Sanofi for image analysis and photography assistance, Cécile Gagaude from Sanofi for reviewing.

The authors would like to thank EPMO and SFOB for supplying free punches, Noesis for efficient support and updating of the image analysis software Visilog 6.8, Medelpharm for tableting assistance and Sanofi where experiments have been carried out, for their financial support.

The authors wish to thank Mrs Stella Ghouti Baxter for proof reading and grammar correction of the document.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Tchoreloff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mollereau, G., Mazel, V., Busignies, V. et al. Image Analysis Quantification of Sticking and Picking Events of Pharmaceutical Powders Compressed on a Rotary Tablet Press Simulator. Pharm Res 30, 2303–2314 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-013-1074-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-013-1074-8

KEY WORDS

Navigation