Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 91, Issue 1, pp 133–153 | Cite as

Probabilistic modelling of forces of hail

  • Shihara Perera
  • Nelson Lam
  • Mahil Pathirana
  • Lihai Zhang
  • Dong Ruan
  • Emad Gad
Original Paper
  • 124 Downloads

Abstract

Numerical modelling techniques enable forcing function at the point of contact in a hail impact to be predicted, but many models available in commercial software have not been verified by experiments. A recently developed deterministic model is only able to simulate the impact action of an idealised spherical hailstone. Results recorded from the impact testing of non-spherical simulated hail ice specimens show wide scatters and are different to spherical specimens. A stochastic model has been developed in this study to incorporate the variability of the modelling parameters representing the behaviour of non-spherical ice specimens and to generate time histories of contact force for given impact scenarios. A probabilistic model which was developed previously to provide predictions of the distribution of the size of hailstones in a severe category hailstorm has also been further developed to provide predictions of the maximum contact force values in probabilistic terms. For any given pre-defined forcing function denting into the surface of a steel plate can be estimated by finite element analysis or experimentally on a test machine. The new knowledge base introduced in this paper can be used by manufacturers and designers to re-assess existing products and in making improvements to future installations taking into account cost–benefit considerations.

Keywords

Hailstone Contact force Forcing function Probabilistic Deterministic 

References

  1. Anghileri M, Castelletti ML, Invernizzi F, Mascheroni M (2005) A survey of numerical models for hail impact analysis using explicit finite element codes. Int J Impact Eng 31:929–944.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ANSI/FM_4473 (2011) ANSI/FM 4473 Test Standard for Impact Resistance. Testing of rigid roofing materials by impacting with Freezer Ice Balls. ANSI/FM 4473. FM Approvals LLC, Norwood, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Appleby-Thomas GJ, Hazell PJ, Dahini G (2011) On the response of two commercially-important CFRP structures to multiple ice impacts. Compos Struct 93:2619–2627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Combescure A, Chuzel-Marmot Y, Fabis J (2011) Experimental study of high-velocity impact and fracture of ice. Int J Solids Struct 48:2779–2790.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.05.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Flueler P (2009) Hail impact resistance of building materials. Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. http://www.rci-online.org/interface/2009-09-flueler.pdf/. Accessed 13 June 2014
  6. Fraile R, Castro A, López L, Sánchez JL, Palencia C (2003) The influence of melting on hailstone size distribution. Atmos Res 67–68:203–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(03)00052-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gessler S, Petty SE (2013) Hail fundamentals and general hail-strike damage assessment methodology. In: Petty SE (ed) Forensic engineering [electronic resource]: damage assessments for residential and commercial structures. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim H, Kedward KT (2000) Modeling hail ice impacts and predicting impact damage initiation in composite structures. AIAA J 38:1278–1288.  https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim H, Welch D, Kedward K (2003) Experimental investigation of high velocity ice impacts on woven carbon/epoxy composite panels. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 34:25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lam N, Tsang HH, Gad EF (2009) Simulation of response to low velocity impact by spreadsheet. Struct Stab Dyn 10:9.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455410003580 Google Scholar
  11. Marshall TP, Herzog RF, Morrison SJ, Smith SR (2004) Hail damage to tile Roofing. Paper presented at the 22nd conference on severe local storms, 2004 October 6Google Scholar
  12. Matson RJ, Huggins AW (1980) The direct measurement of the sizes, shapes and kinematics of falling hailstones. J Atmos Sci 37:1107–1125.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<1107:TDMOTS>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Olsson R, Juntikka R, Asp LE (2013) High velocity hail impact on composite laminates—modelling and testing. In: Abrate S, Castanié B, Rajapakse SYD (eds) Dynamic failure of composite and sandwich structures. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 393–426.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5329-7_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Park H, Kim H (2010) Damage resistance of single lap adhesive composite joints by transverse ice impact. Int J Impact Eng 37:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Paterson DA, Sankaran R (1994) Hail impact on building envelopes. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 53:229–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)90028-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Perera S, Lam N, Pathirana M, Zhang L, Ruan D, Gad E (2016) Deterministic solutions for contact force generated by impact of windborne debris. Int J Impact Eng 91:126–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sharafi P, Teh LH, Hadi MNS (2013) Theory based sensitivity analysis and damage detection of steel roof sheeting for hailstone impact. In: Catbas F, Pakzad S, Racic V, Pavic A, Reynolds P (eds) Topics in dynamics of civil structures, vol 4. Conference Proceedings of the Society for experimental Mechanics series. Springer, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  18. Shimek E, Ekwaro-Osire S, Rasty J (2011) Probabilistic analysis of steel roof damage from hail strike. In: ASME 2011 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 503–510Google Scholar
  19. Sun J, Lam N, Zhang L, Ruan D, Gad E (2015) Contact forces generated by hailstone impact. Int J Impact Eng 84:145–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.05.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tippmann J, Kim H, Rhymer J (2013) Experimentally validated strain rate dependent material model for spherical ice impact simulation. Int J Impact Eng 57:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yang Y, Lam N, Zhang L (2012a) Estimation of response of plate structure subject to low velocity impact by a solid object. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 12:1250053.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455412500538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang Y, Lam N, Zhang L (2012b) Evaluation of simplified methods of estimating beam responses to impact. Int J Struct Stab Dyn.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455412500162 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Infrastructure EngineeringThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Science, Engineering and TechnologySwinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia

Personalised recommendations