Skip to main content
Log in

Integrators’ Air Transport Networks in Europe

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integrators are shipping carriers that control complete air and road delivery networks and offer a wide range of package delivery services. Despite the increasing relevance of small package delivery services in the European air transport market, very little has been written on integrated carriers’ air transport networks on the Old Continent. In this paper we examine the network configurations of DHL, FedEx, TNT, and UPS in terms of hubs, spokes, and market shares. Our results show that integrators operate hub-and-spoke networks. Network indices and centrality measures confirm that their network structures are more similar to those of full-service passenger carriers rather than those of low-cost carriers. However, the nature of their hub-and-spoke systems is different because freight tons, as compared to passengers, are more easily flown along multiple-stop and circular routes. As a consequence, FedEx, TNT, and UPS operate non-pure star networks with a dominant central hub and a set of intermediate airports acting as stops between the central hub and (usually) one “external airport”. DHL operates a multi-hub architecture, with a main dominant hub in Leipzig and a set of “secondary hubs” that provide several connections to other network nodes. Furthermore, we provide evidence of the most important intra-Europe and long-haul routes for each integrator, showing that DHL seems to have a more developed Europe-Asia connection, and is the only integrator to connect Europe to Sub-Saharan Africa. Finally, we show the high degree of complementarity existing between FedEx and TNT networks and that such complementarity is confirmed also by an analysis of their market shares in the different European sub-markets. Despite the significant level of market concentration, our analysis shows that the recent merger between FedEx and TNT is not expected to significantly modify market equilibrium in Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On January 2016, the EC approved the acquisition of TNT Express by FedEx Corporation, although three years earlier, the EC had prohibited the planned acquisition of TNT by UPS. See EC (2013), EC (2016), and Buettner et al. (2013) for a deeper discussion.

  2. Amazon.com, the world’s biggest online retailer, has signed a deal to lease 20 Boeing 767 widebody cargo aircraft to handle more of its own deliveries in the U.S.

  3. We collected data directly from the website. In the section Data/Aircraft each airline has an aircraft fleet associated and the weekly schedule of each single aircraft is available. Freely accessible information is limited to one week ending the current day and starting six days earlier. More specifically, the information collected are (i) flight date and time, (ii) operating airline, (iii) origin and destination, and (iv) aircraft model. Note that we consider an airport as European if, according to the OAG database, the corresponding region is “Western Europe” or “Eastern/Central Europe”.

  4. Unfortunately, no comprehensive official sources exist to help in this matching. Hence we collect information from the websites of the airlines and/or from websites with content dedicated to air cargo (e.g., Flightradar24 and www.airliners.net).

  5. Notice that the actual capacity of freighters may be lower than the nominal payload because integrators’ traffic tends to be low density (i.e. “volumetric” according to the industry jargon). Furthermore, the integrated carriers make also use of belly-hold capacity on passenger airlines. Unfortunately, there are no data sources available to incorporate this “borrowed capacity” in the analysis.

  6. AFTs at each airport are computed as the sum of the payloads of arrival and departure flights. As already explained, payloads were obtained by matching the aircraft models indicated in Flightradar24 data to the corresponding aircraft capacity according to two main sources: the integrators’ websites and Morrell (2011), who indicates the typical payload of the most popular freighters.

  7. The area includes major European economic centres of Benelux, German Rhineland, Southern Germany, French Alsace, Switzerland, and Northern Italy (Palacio and Wojciechowski 2015).

  8. Note that Grubesic et al. (2008 and 2009) use also the concept of nodal regions since they analysed thousands of worldwide origins and destinations provided by hundreds of passenger airlines. The focus of our analysis is instead limited to a single region (Europe) and a single integrated carrier at a time.

  9. Note a second (relatively small) dominant airport in the DHL network represented by Liege LGG. This result is due to the way in which dominant airports are identified. More specifically, Liege LGG dominates some airports without being dominated by any airport in the network.

  10. The data source for passenger airlines network is OAG and data refers to a week of scheduled flights in October 2011.

  11. The gamma index is computed as γ = e / (0.5v)(v-1), where e is the number of edges and v the number of vertices.

  12. Eigenvector and betweenness centrality measures are also largely used in social network analyses. See Fire and Puzis (2016) as an example. Interestingly, the two measures of centrality have been already applied to the air cargo industry in a recent contribution from Wong et al. (2016).

  13. Betweenness centrality has also been used, among other techniques, in Sun et al. (2017) to analyze the criticality of nodes in air transportation.

  14. Connections to Morocco (DHL) and Tunisia (TNT) are not included in Figs. 4 and 6 because of their low volumes.

  15. Note that EU airline ownership and control rules will foster TNT to sell (1) TNT Airways and, (2) Pan Air Lineas Aereas to the Ireland-based ASL Aviation Group. However, these purchases should not significantly affect market equilibrium in Europe given that ASL is expected to operate such flights for TNT (Reuters 2016).

  16. Note that we do not consider smaller package delivery companies (e.g., DPD in France and GLS in the U.K.) in our analysis that combine dense national delivery networks with significant economies of scale. As highlighted in Buettner et al. (2013), their lack of integration into (1) an air network, and (2) a foreign delivery network make them significantly “distant” competitors.

  17. Note that our computation obviously only provides a proxy of the market structure given that it simply takes into account the air cargo space. This means that an aircraft flown from airport A to airport B through airport C generates a higher market share than the same aircraft flown directly from A to B. This basically means that the higher the turnover of parcels at airport C, the more accurate the computed market share.

  18. By “global” we mean that countries outside Europe are also considered. We recall that our dataset includes all of the flights having at least one between origin and destination located in Europe. Hence, freight volumes in countries outside Europe refer to the part originated by intercontinental connections to or from Europe.

  19. Note that even if market shares are computed by considering only available cargo space on aircraft, our results appear to be reasonable—e. g., they are in line with the market shares shown in DHL (2016) and Stevens (2015) for international shipments.

  20. The available freight tonnes arrived at and departed from all the airports in country A are summed to gain the market share in country A.

References

  • Airbus (2015) Global Market Forecast. Airbus SAS, Toulouse

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderighi M, Cento A, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (2007) Assessment of New Hub-and-Spoke and Point-to-Point Airline Network Configurations. Transp Rev 27(5):529–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black WR (2003) Transportation: a geographical analysis. The Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeing (2014) World Air Cargo Forecast 2014–2015. Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich P (1972) Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J Math Sociol 2(1):113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen JT (2012) A spatial analysis of FedEx and UPS: hubs, spokes, and network structure. J Transp Geogr 24:419–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen JT, Leinbach TR, Mabazza D (2010) Air cargo services, the state and industrialization strategies in the Philippines: the redevelopment of Subic Bay. Reg Stud 36(5):451–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buettner T, Federico G, Kühn KU, Magos D (2013) Economic analysis at the European commission 2012–2013. Rev Ind Organ 43(4):265–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan Y, Ponder RJ (1979) The small package air freight industry in the United States: a review of the Federal Express experience. Trans Res Gen 13(4):221–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Chon L (2016) Liège feels the threat of FedEx takeover. The Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/7ca53d10-734a-11e5-bdb1-e6e4767162cc

  • CRR - Centre for Retail Research (2015) Online Retailing in Europe, the U.S. and Canada 2015–2016. Research Report for RetailMeNo

  • Dickinson RE (2013) City Regn Westrn Europ Ils 170. Routledge, Abingdon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DHL (2016) Business Profile. Investor Relations. https://www.dpdhl.com/content/dam/dpdhl/Investoren/Veranstaltungen/Reporting/2016/FY2015/DPDHL_Business_Profile_2016.pdf. Accessed 30 March 2016

  • Doganis R (2009) Flying Off Course IV: Airline Economics and Marketing. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012) Decision 30.03.2012: Art. 6(2). Case M. M.6447 IAG/ BMI

  • European Commission (2013) Decision 30.01.2013: Art. 8(3). Case M.6570 UPS/TNT EXPRESS

  • European Commission (2016) Decision 08.01.2016: Art. 8(1). Case M.7630 FEDEX/TNT EXPRESS

  • Fire M, Puzis R (2016) Organization mining using online social networks. Netw Spat Econ 16(2):545–578

  • Freeman LC (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1):35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillen D (2006) Airline business models and networks: regulation, competition and evolution in aviation markets. Rev Netw Econ 5(4):366–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraud T, Beauguitte L, Guérois M (2016) Introduction to the flows package. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/flows/vignettes/flows.html

  • Grubesic TH, Matisziw TC, Zook MA (2008) Global airline networks and nodal regions. GeoJournal 71(1):53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubesic TH, Matisziw TC, Zook MA (2009) Spatio-temporal fluctuations in the global airport hierarchies. J Transp Geogr 17(4):264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall RW (1989) Configuration of an overnight package air network. Transp Res A Gen 23(2):139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesling MK, Hansen M (1993) Integrated air freight cost structure: the case of federal express. University of California Transportation Center

  • Kuby MJ, Gray RG (1993) The hub network design problem with stopovers and feeders: The case of Federal Express. Transp Res A Policy Pract 27(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafaye A (2007) Integrators’ air network a review of the domestic express european market. Dissertation, Cranfield University, Cranfield

  • Lakew PA (2014) Economies of traffic density and scale in the integrated air cargo industry: The cost structures of FedEx Express and UPS Airlines. J Air Trans Manag 35:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín JC, Voltes-Dorta A (2008) Theoretical evidence of existing pitfalls in measuring hubbing practices in airline networks. Netw Spat Econ 8(2–3):161–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason RO, McKenney JL, Carlson W, Copeland D (1997) Absolutely, positively operations research: The Federal Express story. Interfaces 27(2):17–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miura H (2012) Stata graph library for network analysis. Stata J 12(1):94–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrell PS (2011) Moving Boxes by Air. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystuen JD, Dacey MF (1961) A graph theory interpretation of nodal regions. Pap Reg Sci 7(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kelly ME, Luna HPL, De Camargo RS, de Miranda JG (2015) Hub location problems with price sensitive demands. Netw Spat Econ 15(4):917–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Kelly ME (2014) Air freight hubs in the FedEx system: analysis of fuel use. J Air Trans Manag 36:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onghena E (2011) Integrators in a changing world. In: Macário R, Van de Voorde E (eds) Critical issues in air transport economics and business. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 112–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Onghena E, Meersman H, Van de Voorde E (2014) A translog cost function of the integrated air freight business: The case of FedEx and UPS. Transp Res A Policy Pract 62:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterlynck S, Swyngedouw E (2010) Noise reduction: the postpolitical quandary of night flights at Brussels airport. Environ Plan A 42(7):1577–1594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster CV, Rubin BM, Strong JS (1997) Economic impacts of transportation investments: the case of Federal Express. Transp J 37(2):34–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacio A, Wojciechowski P (2015) Rhine Alpine- work plan of the European Coordinator - European Commission. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/1st_workplan_ralp_0.pdf

  • Park Y, Choi JK, Zhang A (2009) Evaluating competitiveness of air cargo express services. Trans Res Logis Trans Rev 45(2):321–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peker M, Kara BY, Campbell JF, Alumur SA (2016) Spatial Analysis of Single Allocation Hub Location Problems. Netw Spat Econ 16(4):1075–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redondi R, Malighetti P, Paleari S (2011) New routes and airport connectivity. Netw Spat Econ 11(4):713–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens L (2015) UPS, FedEx Move Full Speed Ahead in Europe. The Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB11363635366385803997104581072472583931798. Accessed 4 Dec 2015

  • Stevens L (2017) Amazon.com Plans First Air Cargo Hub. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/amazon-com-plans-first-air-cargo-hub-1485901557. Accessed 29 Dec 2017

  • Sun X, Wandelt S, Cao X (2017) On Node Criticality in Air Transportation Networks. Netw Spat Econ 17(3):737–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taner MR, Kara BY (2016) Endogenous Effects of Hubbing on Flow Intensities. Netw Spat Econ 16(4):1151–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasagar J (2016) DHL braced for home turf fight with FedEx after TNT deal. The Financial Times. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/a60e86ec-2ec2-11e5-8873-775ba7c2ea3d.html#axzz48MONOjNw. Accessed 30 Oct 2015

  • Wang J, Mo H, Wang F (2014) Evolution of air transport network of China 1930–2012. J Transp Geogr 40:145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong JT, Chung YS, Hsu PY (2016) Cargo market competition among Asia Pacific's major airports. J Air Trans Manag 56:91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participants of the Air Transport Research Society (ATRS) World Conference 2016 for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Scotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malighetti, P., Martini, G., Redondi, R. et al. Integrators’ Air Transport Networks in Europe. Netw Spat Econ 19, 557–581 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-018-9390-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-018-9390-5

Keywords

Navigation