Advertisement

Natural Language Semantics

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 53–90 | Cite as

Investigating the form-meaning mapping in the acquisition of English and Japanese measure phrase comparatives

  • Tomoe Arii
  • Kristen Syrett
  • Takuya Goro
Article

Abstract

We present a set of experiments investigating how English- and Japanese-speaking children interpret Measure Phrase comparatives (e.g., X is 10 meters taller than Y / X-wa Y-yori 10-meters takai). We show that despite overt cues to the comparative interpretation (i.e., the comparative -er morpheme in English, and explicit linguistic and visual reference to a contextual standard), children representing both languages diverge from their adult counterparts in that they access a non-adult-like ‘absolute measurement’ interpretation (i.e., X is 10 meters tall). We propose to account for their response pattern by appealing to proposals by Svenonius and Kennedy (in Frascarelli, ed., Phases of interpretation, Mouton de Gruyter, 2006) and Sawada and Grano (Nat Lang Semant 19:191−226, 2011) that Meas in the head of the DegP, which houses the differential, selects for an absolute minimal value: zero. We argue that young children appeal to this absolute zero minimum in lieu of the correct derived standard, and must learn to override this value by appealing to the context to set the standard of comparison when interpretation requires them to do so.

Keywords

Language acquisition Measure phrases Differentials Comparative constructions English Japanese 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alrenga, Peter, Christopher Kennedy, and Jason Merchant. 2012. A new standard of comparison. In Proceedings of WCCFL 30, ed. Nathan Arnett and Ryan Bennett, 32–42. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barner, David, and Jesse Snedeker. 2008. Compositionality and statistics in adjective acquisition: 4-year-olds interpret tall and short based on the size distributions of novel noun referents. Child Development 79: 594–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartsch, Renate, and Theo Vennemann. 1973. Semantic structures: A study in the relation between syntax and semantics. Frankfurt: Athenäum Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, Sigrid. 2011. Comparison constructions. In Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 2, ed. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner, 1341–1389. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, Sigrid, Toshiko Oda, and Koji Sugisaki. 2004. Parametric variation in the semantics of comparison: Japanese vs. English. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13: 289–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, Sigrid, Svetlana Krasikova, Daniel Fleischer, Remus Gergel, Stefan Hofstetter, Christiane Savelsberg, John Vanderelst, and Elisabeth Villalta. 2009. Crosslinguistic variation in comparison constructions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 9: 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhatt, Rajesh, and Shoichi Takahashi. 2011. Reduced and unreduced phrasal comparatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 581–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bierwisch, Manfred. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In Dimensional adjectives: Grammatical structure and conceptual interpretation, ed. Manfred Bierwisch and Ewald Lang, 71–261. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloom, Lois, Lois Hood, and Patsy Lightbown. 1974. Imitation in language development: if, when and why. Cognitive Psychology 6: 380–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bloom, Lois, Patsy Lightbown, and Lois Hood. 1975. Structure and variation in child language. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 40(2): 1–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boster, Carole, and Stephen Crain. 1993. On children’s understanding of every and or. In Proceedings of early cognition and transition to language, ed. Carlota Smith, 1–23. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chien, Yu-Chin, and Ken Wexler. 1990. Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1: 225–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chierchia, Gennaro, Stephen Crain, Maria Guasti, and Rosalind Thornton. 1998. ‘Some’ and ‘or’: A study on the emergence of logical form. In Proceedings of BUCLD 22, ed. Annabel Greenhill et al;, 97–108. Somerville. MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  15. Choi, Youngon, and John C. Trueswell. 2010. Children’s (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: Evidence for developing control in sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 106: 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, Herbert. 1970. The primitive nature of children’s relational concepts. In Cognition and the development of language, ed. John R. Hayes, 269–278. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, Eve V. 1979. Building a vocabulary: Words for objects, actions and relations. In Language acquisition: Studies in first language development, ed. Paul Fletcher and Michael Garman, 149–160. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Conroy, Anastasia, Eri Takahashi, Jeffrey Lidz, and Colin Phillips. 2009. Equal treatment for all antecedents: How children succeed with Principle B. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 446–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crain, Stephen, and Cecile McKee. 1985. The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Proceedings of NELS 15, ed. Stephen Berman, Jae-Wong Choe, and Joyce McDonough, 94–110. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
  20. Crain, Stephen, and Rosalind Thornton. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cresswell, Maxwell. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Montague grammar, ed. Barbara H. Partee, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dale, Philip S., and Larry Fenson. 1996. Lexical development norms for young children. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 28: 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Donaldson, Margaret. 1963. A study of children’s thinking. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  24. Donaldson, Margaret, and Roger J. Wales. 1970. On the acquisition of some relational terms. In Cognition and the development of language, ed. John R. Hayes and Roger Brown, 235–268. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Duthie, John. 1963. A further study of overlap error in three-term series problems. In A study of children’s thinking, ed. Margaret Donaldson, 223–249. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  26. Ebeling, Karen S., and Susan A. Gelman. 1994. Children’s use of context in interpreting big and little. Child Development 65: 1178–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gelman, Susan A., and Karen S. Ebeling. 1989. Children’s use of nonegocentric standards in judgments of functional size. Child Development 60: 920–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gor, Vera, and Kristen Syrett. 2015. Picking up after sloppy children: What pronouns reveal about children’s analysis of English comparative constructions. In Proceedings of BUCLD 39, ed. Elizabeth Grillo and Kyle Jepson, 191–203. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  30. Grodzinsky, Yosef, and Tanya Reinhart. 1993. The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 69–101.Google Scholar
  31. Guasti, Maria Teresa, Stavroula Stavrakaki, and Fabrizio Arosio. 2008. Number and case in the comprehension of relative clauses: Evidence from Italian and Greek. In Language acquisition and development, ed. Anna Gavarró and Maria João Freitas, 230–240. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Hackl, Martin. 2001. Comparative quantifiers. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  33. Hamburger, Henry, and Stephen Crain. 1982. Relative acquisition. In Language development, vol. 2, ed. Stan Kuczaj, 245–274. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Hayashishita, J.-R. 2009. Yori-comparative: A reply to Beck et al. (2004). Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18: 65–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Unpublished ms., University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  36. Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Hellan, Lars. 1981. Towards an integrated analysis of comparatives. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
  38. Hoeksema, J. 1983. Negative polarity and the comparative. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hohaus, Vera, Sonja Tiemann, and Sigrid Beck. 2014. Acquisition of comparison constructions. Language Acquisition 21: 215–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hyams, Nina. 1986. Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hyams, Nina. 1992. A reanalysis of null subjects in child language. In Theoretical issues in language acquisition, ed. Jürgen Weissenborn, Helen Goodluck, and Thomas Roeper, 249–268. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Kamp, Hans. 1975. Two theories about adjectives. In Formal semantics for natural languages, ed. Edward L. Keenan, 123–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kamp, Hans, and Barbara Partee. 1995. Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition 57: 129–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kennedy, Christopher. 2001. Polar opposition and the ontology of ‘degrees’. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 33–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kennedy, Christopher. 2007a. Modes of comparison. In Proceedings of CLS 43, ed. Malcolm Elliott et al., 141–165. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  46. Kennedy, Christopher. 2007b. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistic and Philosophy 20: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kennedy, Christopher. 1999. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Garland. (1997 PhD, University of California, Santa Cruz.)Google Scholar
  48. Kennedy, Christopher, and Beth Levin. 2008. Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics and discourse, ed. Louise McNally and Christopher Kennedy, 156–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Kennedy, Christopher, and Louise McNally. 2005. Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kikuchi, Akira. 2006. On the interpretation of measure phrases in English and Japanese. In Studies in language, speech and communication: The Proceedings of Linguistics and Phonetics 2002 (LP2002), ed. Shoshuke Haraguchi, Osamu Fujimura, and Bohumil Palek, 971–980. Prague: Karolinum Press.Google Scholar
  51. Klein, Ewan. 1980. A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kubota, Yusuke. 2011. Phrasal comparatives in Japanese: A measure function-based analysis. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8: 267–286.Google Scholar
  53. Layton, Thomas L., and Sheldon L. Stick. 1978. Comprehension and production of comparatives and superlatives. Journal of Child Language 6: 511–527.Google Scholar
  54. Lechner, Winfried. 2001. Reduced and phrasal comparatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 683–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lechner, Winfried. 2004. Ellipsis in comparatives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  57. Matthei, Edward M. 1982. The acquisition of prenominal modifier sequences. Cognition 11: 301–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Moore, Deanna. 1999. Comparatives and superlatives: Lexical before functional. In Proceedings of BUCLD 24, ed. Alejna Brugos, Anna H.-J. Do, and Annabel Greenhill, 474–481. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  59. Nakanishi, Kimiko. 2007. Formal properties of measurement constructions. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oda, Toshiko. 2008. Degree constructions in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
  61. Omaki, Akira, and Jeffrey Lidz. 2015. Linking parser development to acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition 22: 158–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pinkal, Manfred. 1989. On the logical structure of comparatives. In Logic and natural language (Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 459), ed. Rudi Studer, 146–167. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  63. Reinhart, Tanya. 1983. Coreference and bound anaphora: A restatement of the anaphora questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 47–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar
  65. Roeper, Thomas. 1972. Approaches to a theory of language acquisition with examples from German children. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  66. Rotstein, Carmen, and Yoad Winter. 2004. Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: scale structure and higher order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 12: 259–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sachs, Jacqueline. 1983. Talking about the there and then: The emergence of displaced reference in parent–child discourse. In Children’s language, vol. 4, ed. Keith E. Nelson, 1–28. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  68. Sapir, Edward. 1944. Grading: A study in semantics. Philosophy of Science 11: 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sawada, Osamu. 2009. Pragmatic aspects of implicit comparison: An economy-based approach. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1079–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sawada, Osamu, and Thomas Grano. 2011. Scale structure, coercion, and the interpretation of measure phrases in Japanese. Natural Language Semantics 19: 191–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schwarzschild, Roger. 2005. Measure phrases as modifiers of adjectives. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 34: 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schwarzschild, Roger. 2008. The semantics of comparatives and other degree constructions. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 308–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sheldon, Amy. 1974. The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Siegal, Muffy. 1976. Capturing the adjective. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  75. Snyder, William, Ken Wexler, and Dolon Das. 1995. The syntactic representation of degree and quantity: Perspectives from Japanese and child English. In The Proceedings of WCCFL 13, ed. Raul Aranovich, et al., 581–596. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  76. Suppes, Patrick. 1974. The semantics of children’s language. American Psychologist 29: 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Svenonius, Peter, and Christopher Kennedy. 2006. Northern Norwegian degree questions and the syntax of measurement. In Phases of Interpretation (Studies in Generative Grammar 91), ed. Mara Frascarelli, 131–161. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  78. Syrett, Kristen. 2013. The role of cardinality in the interpretation of measurement expressions. Language Acquisition 20: 228–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Syrett, Kristen, and Jeffrey Lidz. 2011. Competence, performance and the locality of Quantifier Raising: Evidence from 4-year-old children. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 305–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Syrett, Kristen, Evan Bradley, Christopher Kennedy, and Jeffrey Lidz. 2006. Shifting standards: Children’s understanding of gradable adjectives. In The Proceedings of the Inaugural GALANA (UConn Occasional Papers in Linguistics 4), ed. Kamil Ud Deen et al., 353–364. Cambridge, MA: UConn.Google Scholar
  81. Syrett, Kristen, Christopher Kennedy, and Jeffrey Lidz. 2010. Meaning and context in children’s understanding of gradable adjectives. Journal of Semantics 27: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Syrett, Kristen, Julien Musolino, and Rochel Gelman. 2012. How can syntax support number word acquisition? Language Learning and Development 8: 146–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tavakolian, Susan. 1981. The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses. In Language acquisition and linguistic theory, ed. Susan Tavakolian, 167–187. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  84. Trueswell, John C., Irina Sekerina, Nicole M. Hill, and Marian L. Logrip. 1999. The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 73: 89–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Valian, Virginia. 1990. Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition 40: 21–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. von Stechow, Arnim. 1984a. My reaction to Cresswell’s, Hellan’s, Hoeksema’s and Seuren’s comments. Journal of Semantics 3: 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. von Stechow, Arnim. 1984b. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Watanabe, Akira. 2013. Non-neutral interpretation of adjectives under measure phrase modification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 22: 261–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Linguistics at RutgersThe State University of New Jersey-New BrunswickNew BrunswickUSA
  3. 3.English Language, Culture & Literature Department at Tsuda CollegeTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations