Advertisement

Metascience

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 469–472 | Cite as

Understanding cultural evolution

Lewens, Tim: Cultural evolution: Conceptual challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 192pp, $45.00 HB
  • David Henderson
Book Review

Over the course of roughly the last two decades, a number of writers have urged an evolutionary approach to culture. This book surveys much of the relevant literature and explores what it means to take an evolutionary approach to cultural change. It distinguishes several things this might mean—all reflected in the literature. Lewens distinguishes three broad packages of ideas to which various proponents of the evolutionary approach are committed: the historical approach, the selectionist approach, and the kinetic approach. Expressions of each approach are highlighted in the writings of prominent proponents. These approaches rely on differing conceptual resources and face differing epistemic challenges. Distinguishing them allows one to then understand why these evolutionary approaches to cultural and cultural change have sometimes been treated with suspicion. Proponents of these evolutionary approaches to culture have not always clearly and decisively distinguished between these...

References

  1. Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, and H. Gintis (eds.). 2004. Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ingold, Tim. 2007. The trouble with “evolutionary biology”. Anthropology Today 23: 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ingold, Tim. 2013. Prospect. In Biosocial becomings: Integrating social and biological anthropology, ed. T. Ingold, and G. Palsson, 1–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lewens, Tim. 2015. Cultural evolution: Conceptual challenges. Cmbridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mesoudi, Alex. 2011. Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Richerson, Peter J., and Robert Boyd. 2005. Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Sperber, Dan, and Nicolas Claidiere. 2008. Defining and explaining culture (comments on Richerson and Boyd, ‘Not by genes alone’). Biology and Philosophy 23(2): 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations