Notes
Or so many might think. Another possibility is that we should treat the event of a’s heating b as a matter of the instantiation by <a,b> of the relation R and that of b’s being heated by a as a matter of the instantiation by <b,a> of the converse relation R*, considered as distinct events. But see (Fine 2000).
Or possibly confusing the event of the pupil’s becoming more knowledgeable with that of his learning from the teacher, i.e., with the becoming knowledgeable being caused by the teacher’s action; the former is indeed distinct from the teacher’s teaching him (i.e., the teacher’s actions causing his becoming knowledgeable), but the latter, many would say, is not.
References
Fine, Kit. 2000. Neutral relations. Philosophical Review 109(1): 1–33.
Gregoric, Pavel. 2007. Aristotle on the common sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johansen, Thomas K. 1998. Aristotle on the sense organs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johansen, Thomas K. 2012. The powers of aristotle’s soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnstone, Mark A. 2015. [Review of A. Marmodoro Aristotle on Perceiving Objects] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Retrieved from https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/54985-aristotle-on-perceiving-objects/.
Marmodoro, Anna and Yates, David. 2016. The metaphysics of relations Oxford: Oxford University Press (forthcoming).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Islam, A. The common sense and sensibility. Metascience 24, 491–496 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-015-0020-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-015-0020-2