Advertisement

Meccanica

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 859–875 | Cite as

Multivariable optimal control of an industrial nonlinear boiler–turbine unit

  • Hamed Moradi
  • Gholamreza Vossoughi
Article

Abstract

Performance control of a boiler–turbine unit is of great importance due to demands for the economical operations of power plants and environmental awareness. In this paper, an optimal control strategy is designed to achieve the desired performance of a boiler–turbine unit. A multivariable nonlinear model of a utility boiler–turbine unit is considered. By manipulation of valves position for the fuel, steam and feed-water flows; output variables including the drum pressure, electric output and fluid density (and consequently drum water level) are controlled. Performance measure of the problem is defined such that the control efforts are minimized while the tracking objectives are obtained. In development of the optimal control strategy, the “variation of extremal” approach is used as an effective tool to handle the nonlinear uncertain problems. Tracking performance of the system is investigated and compared for three cases; tracking from a specific operating point to another ‘near’, ‘far’ and ‘farther’ operating point (depending on the distance between the operating points, the qualitative phrases ‘near’, ‘far’ and farther’ are used). According to the results obtained, more control efforts are required for the tracking of farther operating points (generally). Also, it is investigated that the designed optimal controller guarantees the robust performance of the system in the presence of model parametric uncertainties.

Keywords

Boiler–turbine unit Nonlinear model Multivariable optimal control Tracking Parametric uncertainty 

List of symbols

\( {\bar{\mathbf{a}}} \)

Nonlinear function in state space

acs

Steam quality

\( H_{\infty } \)

H-infinity robust technique

H

Hamiltonian function

I

Identity matrix

J

Performance measure (objective function)

pi

i-th Component of P (i = 1, 2, 3)

P

Co-state vector

\( {\tilde{\mathbf{P}}}_{{\mathbf{x}}} \)

State influence matrix

\( {\tilde{\mathbf{P}}}_{{\mathbf{p}}} \)

Co-state influence matrix

qe

Evaporation rate (kg/s)

qi

i-th Component of Q (i = 1, 2, 3)

Q

A real symmetric positive semi-definite matrix

ri

i-th Component of R (i = 1, 2, 3)

R

A real symmetric positive definite matrix

t

Time (s)

t0

Initial time

tf

Final time

u1

Valve position of fuel flow

u2

Valve position of steam control

u3

Valve position of feed-water flow

\( u_{i}^{*} \)

Optimal control signals in terms of state and co-state variables (i = 1, 2, 3)

U

Control input vector

xi

i-th State variable

X

State vector

Xd

Desired state vector

y1

Drum pressure (kg f/cm2) (y 1 = x 1)

y2

Electric output (MW) (y 2 = x 2)

y3

Fluid density (kg/m3) (y 3 = x 3)

y4

Drum water level (m)

\( y_{i}^{(j)} \)

Output y i at the operating point # j

δ

Parameter taking a small value

\( \psi_{i} \)

A nonlinear function (i = 1, 2)

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the ‘National Elite Foundation of Iran’ for supporting this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Tan W, Marquez HJ, Chen T, Liu J (2005) Analysis and control of a nonlinear boiler–turbine unit. J Process Control 15:883–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tan W, Fang F, Tian L, Fu C, Liu J (2008) Linear control of a boiler–turbine unit: analysis and design. ISA Trans 47:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Donate PD, Moiola JL (1994) Model of a once-through boiler for dynamic studies. Latin Am Appl Res 24:159–166Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lo KL, Zeng PL, Marchand E, Pinkerton A (1990) Modelling and state estimation of power plant steam turbines. IEEE Proc Part C 137(2):80–94Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murty VV, Sreedhar R, Fernandez B, Masada GY, Hill AS (1993) Boiler system identification using sparse neural networks. In: Proceedings of ASME Winter Meeting, New Orleans, pp 103–111Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Astrom KJ, Eklund K (1972) A simplified nonlinear model of a drum boiler turbine unit. Int J Control 16(1):145–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rink R, White D, Chiu A, Leung R (1996) SYNSIM: A computer simulation model for the Mildred Lake steam/electrical system of Syncrude Canada Ltd. University of Alberta, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adam EJ, Marchetti JL (1999) Dynamic simulation of large boilers with natural recirculation. J Comput Chem Eng 23:1031–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim H, Choi S (2005) A model on water level dynamics in natural circulation drum-type boilers. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 32:786–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kouadri A, Namoun A, Zelmat M (2013) Modelling the nonlinear dynamic behaviour of a boiler–turbine system using a radial basis function neural network. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 24:1873–1886MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rusinowski H, Stanek W (2007) Neural modelling of steam boilers. J Energy Convers Manag 48:2802–2809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moon UC, Lee KY (2011) An adaptive dynamic matrix control with fuzzy-interpolated step-response model for a drum-type boiler–turbine system. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 26(2):393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bell RD, Astrom KJ (1987) Dynamic models for boiler–turbine-alternator units: data logs and parameter estimation for a 160 MW unit. In: Technical Report LUTFD2/(TFRT-3192)/1-137; Department of Automatic Control, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Astrom KJ, Bell RD (2000) Drum-boiler dynamics. J Autom 36:363–378MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li C, Zhou J, Li Q, An X, Xiang X (2010) A new T–S fuzzy-modeling approach to identify a boiler–turbine system. Expert Syst Appl 37(3):2214–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu XJ, Kong XB, Hou GL, Wang JH (2013) Modeling of a 1000 MW power plant ultra super-critical boiler system using fuzzy-neural network methods. Energy Convers Manag 65:518–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Collazo J, Porteiro J, Míguez JL, Granada E, Gómez MA (2012) Numerical simulation of a small-scale biomass boiler. Energy Convers Manag 64:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bracco S, Troilo M, Trucco A (2009) A simple dynamic model and stability analysis of a steam boiler drum. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A: J Power Energy 223(7):809–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aranda E, Frye M, Chunjiang Q (2008) Model development, state estimation, and controller design of a nonlinear utility boiler system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT’08), Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, Article # 4608412, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kouprianov VI, Kaewboonsong W (2004) Modeling the effects of operating conditions on fuel and environmental costs for a 310 MW boiler firing fuel oil. Energy Convers Manag 45(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang S, Qian C (2009) Real-time optimal control of a boiler–turbine system using pseudospectral methods. In: 19th Annual Joint ISA POWID/EPRI Controls and Instrumentation Conference and 52nd ISA POWID Symposium, Rosemont, Illinois, USA, Article # 477, pp 166–177Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu H, Li S, Chai T (2003) Intelligent decoupling control of power plant main steam pressure and power output. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 25(10):809–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu X, Kong X (2013) Nonlinear fuzzy model predictive iterative learning control for drum-type boiler–turbine system. J Process Control 23(8):1023–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prokhorenkov AM, Sovlukov AS (2002) Fuzzy models in control systems of boiler aggregate technological processes. J Comput Stand Interfaces 24:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kocaarslan I, Ertuğrul C, Tiryaki H (2006) A fuzzy logic controller application for thermal power plants. J Energy Convers Manag 47:442–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thangavelusamy D, Ponnusamy I (2013) Elimination of chattering using fuzzy sliding mode controller for drum boiler turbine system. Control Eng Appl Inform 15(2):78–85Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eitelberg E, Boje E (2004) Water circulation control during once-through boiler start-up. J Control Eng Pract 12:677–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li D, Chen T, Marquez HJ, Gooden RK (2006) Life extending control of boiler–turbine systems via model predictive methods. J Control Eng Pract 14:319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen PC, Shamma JS (2004) Gain-scheduled l 1-optimal control for boiler–turbine dynamics with actuator saturation. J Process Control 14:263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yu T, Chan KW, Tong JP, Zhou B, Li DH (2010) Coordinated robust nonlinear boiler–turbine-generator control systems via approximate dynamic feedback linearization. J Process Control 20:365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Abdennour A (2000) An intelligent supervisory system for drum type boilers during severe disturbances. J Electr Power Energy Syst 22:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nanhua Y, Wentong M, Ming S (2006) Application of adaptive Gray predictor based algorithm to boiler drum level control. J Energy Convers Manag 47:2999–3007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fang F, Wei L (2011) Backstepping-based nonlinear adaptive control for coal-fired utility boiler–turbine units. J Appl Energy 88:814–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moradi H, Bakhtiari-Nejad F, Saffar-Avval M (2009) Robust control of an industrial boiler system; a comparison between two approaches: sliding mode control & H technique. J Energy Convers Manag 50:1401–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moradi H, Alasty A, Bakhtiari-Nejad F (2007) Control of a nonlinear boiler–turbine unit using two methods: gain scheduling and feedback linearization. In: 2007 ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, IMECE2007-42945, November 11–15, Seattle, Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tan W, Marquez HJ, Chen T (2002) Multivariable robust controller design for a boiler system. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 10(5):735–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Moradi H, Saffar-Avval M, Bakhtiari-Nejad F (2012) Sliding mode control of drum water level in an industrial boiler unit with time varying parameters: a comparison with H robust control approach. J Process Control 22(10):1844–1855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moradi H, Bakhtiari-Nejad F (2011) Improving boiler unit performance using an optimum robust minimum-order observer. J Energy Convers Manag 52(3):1728–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kirk DE (1998) Optimal control theory. Dover Publications Inc., MineolaGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moradi H, Alasty A, Saffar-Avval M, Bakhtiari-Nejad F (2013) Multivariable control of an industrial boiler–turbine unit with nonlinear model: a comparison between gain scheduling and feedback linearization approaches. Trans B: Mech Eng J Sci Iran 20(5):1485–1498Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Excellence in Design, Robotics and Automation, School of Mechanical EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations