Skip to main content
Log in

Improved torsional analysis of laminated box beams

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The improved torsional analysis of the laminated box beams with single- and double-celled sections subjected to a torsional moment is performed by introducing 14 displacement parameters. For this, a thin-walled laminated box beam theory considering the effects of shear and elastic couplings is presented. The governing equations and the force-displacement relations are derived from the variation of the strain energy. The system of linear algebraic equations with non-symmetric matrix is constructed by introducing the displacement parameters and by transforming the higher order simultaneous differential equations into first order ones. This numerical technique determines eigenmodes corresponding to 12 zero and 2 non-zero eigenvalues and derives displacement functions for displacement parameters based on the undetermined parameter method. Finally, the element stiffness matrix is determined using the member force-displacement relations. The theory developed by this study is validated by comparing several torsional responses from the present approach with those from the finite element beam model using the Lagrangian interpolation polynomials and three-dimensional analysis results using the shell elements of ABAQUS for coupled laminated beams with single- and double-celled sections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vlasov VZ (1961) Thin walled elastic beams, 2nd edn. Israel Program for Scientific Transactions, Jerusalem

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gjelsvik A (1981) The theory of thin-walled bars. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Vo TP, Lee J (2008) Flexural-torsional behavior of thin-walled composite box beams using shear-deformable beam theory. Eng Struct 30:1958–1968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vo TP, Lee J (2007) Flexural-torsional behavior of thin-walled closed-section composite box beams. Eng Struct 29:1774–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jung SN, Park IJ (2005) A simple mixed-based approach for thin-walled composite blades with two-cell sections. J Mech Sci Technol 19:2016–2024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Loughlan J, Ata M (1998) Variable twist torsion tests on carbon fibre composite beams. Compos Struct 42:307–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Loughlan J, Ata M (1998) The analysis of carbon fibre composite box beams subjected to torsion with variable twist. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 152:373–391

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Stemple AD, Lee SW (1988) Finite element model for composite beams with arbitrary cross-sectional warping. AIAA J 26:1512–1520

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Laulusa A, Reddy JN (2004) On shear and extensional locking in nonlinear composite beams. Eng Struct 26:151–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Salim HA, Davalos JF (2005) Torsion of open and closed thin-walled laminated composite sections. J Compos Mater 39:497–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kollár LP, Pluzsik A (2002) Analysis of thin-walled composite beams with arbitrary layup. J Reinf Plast Compos 21:1423–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Loughlan J, Ata M (1997) The constrained torsional characteristics of some carbon fibre composite box-beams. Thin-Walled Struct 28:233–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrero JF, Barrau JJ, Segura JM, Castanie B, Sudre M (2001) Torsion of thin-walled composite beams with midplane symmetry. Compos Struct 54:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrero JF, Barrau JJ, Segura JM, Sudre M, Castanie B (2001) Analytical theory for an approach calculation of non-balanced composite box beams. Thin-Walled Struct 39:709–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rand O (1998) Fundamental closed-form solutions for solid and thin-walled composite beams including a complete out-of-plane warping model. Int J Solids Struct 35:2775–2793

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim C, White SR (1997) Thick-walled composite beam theory including 3-D elastic effects and torsional warping. Int J Solids Struct 34:4237–4259

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Abaqus standard user’s manual, Ver 6.1 (2003). Hibbit, Kalsson & Sorensen, Inc, Abagus, Pawtucket, RI

  18. Vo TP, Lee J, Ahn N (2009) On sixfold coupled vibrations of thin-walled composite box beams. Compos Struct 89:524–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paolone A, Ruta G, Vidoli S (2009) Torsion in multi-cell thin-walled girders. Acta Mech 206:163–171

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee J (2005) Flexural analysis of thin-walled composite beams using shear-deformable beam theory. Compos Struct 70:212–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Back SY, Will KM (2008) Shear-flexible thin-walled element for composite I. Beams. Eng Struct 30:1447–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kollár LP (2001) Flexural-torsional vibration of open section composite beams with shear deformation. Int J Solids Struct 38:7543–7558

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Kollár LP (2001) Flexural-torsional buckling of open section composite columns with shear deformation. Int J Solids Struct 38:7525–7541

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim MY, Chang SP, Kim SB (1994) Spatial stability and free vibration of shear flexible thin-walled elastic beams. Int J Numer Methods Eng 37:4097–4115

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang SP, Kim SB, Kim MY (1996) Stability of shear deformable thin-walled space frames and circular arches. J Eng Mech 122:844–854

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jones RM (1999) Mechanics of composite material, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jung SN, Park IJ, Shin ES (2007) Theory of thin-walled composite beams with single and double-cell sections. Composites, Part B 38:182–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith EC, Chopra I (1991) Formulation and evaluation of an analytical model for composite box-beams. J Am Helicopter Soc 36:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. IMSL (1995) Microsoft IMSL library. Microsoft Corporation

  30. Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  31. Park SA, Shin DK, Park YS (2004) Torsional analysis of thin-walled laminated composite closed box beam. KSCE J Civ Eng 11:1255–1266

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support of the research reported here by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010-0019373 & 2012R1A2A1A01007405) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaehong Lee.

Additional information

This is an original paper which has neither previously, nor simultaneously, in whole or in part, been submitted anywhere else.

Appendices

Appendix A: Stress resultants of the beam

(A.1)

where F x and F y are the shear forces in the x and y directions, respectively; F z is the axial force; M x and M y are the bending moments about the x- and y-axes, respectively; M ϕ is the bimoment; T and M t are the two contributions to the total twisting moment.

Appendix B: Constitutive equations for the laminate box beam

$$ \left\{ \begin{array}{c} F_{z} \\ M_{x} \\ M_{y} \\ M_{\phi } \\ M_{t} \\ F_{x} \\ F_{y} \\ T \end{array} \right\} = \left[ \begin{array}{c@{\quad }c@{\quad }c@{\quad }c@{\quad }c@{\quad }c@{\quad }c@{\quad }c} E_{11} & E_{12} & E_{13} & E_{14} & E_{15} & E_{16} & E_{17} & E_{18} \\ & E_{22} & E_{23} & E_{24} & E_{25} & E_{26} & E_{27} & E_{28} \\ & & E_{33} & E_{34} & E_{35} & E_{36} & E_{37} & E_{38} \\ & & & E_{44} & E_{45} & E_{46} & E_{47} & E_{48} \\ & & & & E_{55} & E_{56} & E_{57} & E_{58} \\ & & & & & E_{66} & E_{67} & E_{68} \\ & \mathrm{Symm}. & & & & & E_{77} & E_{78} \\ & & & & & & & E_{88} \end{array} \right] \left\{ \begin{array}{c} U'_{z} \\ \omega'_{x} \\ - \omega'_{y} \\ f' \\ \omega'_{p} - f \\ U'_{x} - \omega_{y} \\ U'_{y} + \omega_{x} \\ f + \omega'_{p} \end{array} \right\} $$
(A.2)

where E ij are the laminate stiffnesses which depend on the cross-section of the laminated box beam.

Appendix C: Matrices X and E in Eqs. (38) and (42), respectively

(A.3)

where

(A.4)

and

(A.5)
(A.6)

where

(A.7)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, NI., Lee, J. Improved torsional analysis of laminated box beams. Meccanica 48, 1369–1386 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-012-9672-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-012-9672-9

Keywords

Navigation