Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 135–152 | Cite as

Husserl’s motivation and method for phenomenological reconstruction

  • Matt Bower


In this paper I present an account of Husserl’s approach to the phenomenological reconstruction of consciousness’s immemorial past, a problem, I suggest, that is quite pertinent for defenders of Lockean psychological continuity views of personal identity. To begin, I sketch the background of the problem facing the very project of a genetic phenomenology, within which the reconstructive analysis is situated. While the young Husserl took genetic matters to be irrelevant to the main task of phenomenology, he would later come to see their importance and, indeed, centrality as the precursor and subsoil for the rationality of consciousness. I then argue that there is a close connection between reconstruction and genetic phenomenology, such that reconstruction is a necessary component of the program of genetic phenomenology, and I set out Husserl’s argument that compels one to enter into reconstructive territory. With that impetus, I schematically lay out the main contours one finds in Husserl’s practice of reconstructive techniques. We find him taking two distinct approaches, that of the individual viewed egologically (through the abstract lens of a single individual’s consciousness) and as embedded in interpersonal relations. Husserl occasionally calls these the approach “from within” and “from without,” respectively. Ultimately, the two approaches are not only complementary, but require one another. In closing, I argue that these considerations lead to a blurring of lines between the genetic and generative phenomenological registers, which challenges the prevalent view that there is a sharp demarcation of the two.


Edmund Husserl Phenomenology Genetic phenomenology Reconstruction Intentionality Memory 


  1. Bejarano, Julio Vargas. 2006. Phänomenologie des Willens: Seine Struktur, sein Ursprung und seine Funktion in Husserls Denken. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  2. Bernet, Rudolf. 2006. Zur Phänomenologie von Trieb und Lust bei Husserl. In Interdiziplinäre Perspektiven der Phänomenologie, ed. Dieter Lohmar, and Dirk Fonfara, 38–53. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biceaga, Victor. 2010. The concept of passivity in Husserl. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dodd, James. 2004. Crisis and reflection: An essay on Husserl’s crisis of the European Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Donohoe, Janet. 2004. Husserl on ethics and intersubjectivity: From static to genetic phenomenology. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  6. Husserl, E. 1965. Philosophy as a rigorous science. In Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy, Q. Lauer (Trans.). New York: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Husserl, Edmund. 1969. Formal and transcendental logic (trans: Dorion Cairns). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and transcendental phenomenology (trans: David Carr). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Husserl, Edmund. 1973a. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität: Texte aus dem Nachlass, Zweiter Teil: 19211928. Iso Kern (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  10. Husserl, Edmund. 1973b. Zur Phänomanologie der Intersubjektivität: Texte aus dem Nachlass, Dritter Teil (19291935). Iso Kern (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  11. Husserl, Edmund. 1973c. Experience and judgment. Ludwig Landgrebe (Ed.), (Trans: Churchill, J.S., and Karl Ameriks). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Husserl, Edmund. 1989a. Aufsätze und Vorträge (19221937). Thomas Nenon and Hans Rainer Sepp (Eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  13. Husserl, Edmund. 1989b. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, second book (trans: Richard Rojcewicz and Andre Schuwer). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  14. Husserl, Edmund. 1997. Thing and space: Lectures of 1907 (Trans./Ed.: Richard Rojcewicz). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. Husserl, Edmund. 1999. Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology (trans: Dorion Cairns). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  16. Husserl, Edmund. 2000. Aktive Synthesen. Aus der Vorlesung “Tranzendentale Logik” 1920/21. In Ergänzungsband zu “Analysen zur passiven synthesis”, ed. Roland Breeur. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Husserl, Edmund. 2001a. Logical investigations, vol. 1 (trans: John N. Findlay), Dermot. Moran (Ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Husserl, Edmund. 2001b. Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic (trans: Anthony Steinbock). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. Husserl, Edmund. 2004a. Einleitung in die Ethik: Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1920 und 1924. Henning Peucker (ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Husserl, Edmund. 2004b. In Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit: Texte aus dem Nachlass (1893-1912), eds. Thomas Vongehr and Regula Giuliani. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Husserl, Edmund. 2006. Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (19291934): Die C-Manuskripte. Dieter Lohmar (Ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Husserl, Edmund. 2008a. Die Lebenswelt: Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution, Texte aus dem Nachlass (19161937). Rochus Sowa (Ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Husserl, E. 2008b. Introduction to logic and theory of knowledge: Lectures 1906/7. C. Ortiz Hill (Trans.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Husserl, E. 2013. Grenzprobleme der Phaenomenologie: Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte. Metaphysik. Spaete Ethik (Texte aus dem Nachlass 1908–1937). R. Sowa and T. Vongehr (Eds.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Jacobs, Hanne. 2010. Towards a phenomenological account of personal identity. In Philosophy, phenomenology, sciences: Essays in Commemoration of Edmund Husserl, ed. Carlo Ierna, Hanne Jacobs, and Fillip Mattens, 333–362. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, Nam-In. 1993. Edmund Husserls Phänomenologie der Instinkte. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Locke, John. 1975. An essay concerning human understanding. P. H. Nidditch (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lohmar, Dieter. 2003. Husserl’s type and Kant’s Schemata. In The New Husserl: A critical reader, ed. Donn Welton, 93–124. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mensch, James. 2010. Husserl’s account of our consciousness of time. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Soffer, Gail. 1996. Philosophy and the Disdain for history: Reflections on Husserl’s Ergänzungsband to the Crisis. Journal of the History of Philosophy 34(1): 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Steinbock, Anthony. 1995. Home and beyond: Generative phenomenology after Husserl. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Steinbock, Anthony. 1998. Husserl’s static and genetic phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review 31: 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steinbock, Anthony. 2003. Generativity and the scope of generative phenomenology. In The New Husserl: A critical reader, ed. D. Welton, 289–326. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Walton, Roberto. 2010. The constitutive and reconstructive building-up of horizons. In Epistemology, archaeology, ethics: Current investigations of Husserl’s Corpus, ed. Pol Vandevelde, and Sebastian Luft, 132–151. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Religious StudiesBeloit CollegeBeloitUSA

Personalised recommendations