Skip to main content
Log in

Allocating a Promotion Budget between Advertising and Sales Contest Prizes: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops and analyzes a normative model for allocating a fixed, short-term promotion budget between product advertising and prizes of a rank-order sales contest for a homogeneous sales force when sales are driven by both personal selling effort and advertising. The model provides insights into how the optimal budget allocations vary with the synergy between advertising and selling effort, sales force size, salesperson risk-tolerance, perceived cost of effort, selling effectiveness and sales response uncertainty. The analysis highlights the need for and value of close coordination between marketing and sales management in designing a promotion program involving both advertising and sales force incentives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basu, A., R. Lal, V. Srinivasan, and R. Staelin. (1985). “Sales Force Compensation Plans: An Agency Theoretic Perspective,” Marketing Science 4(4), 267–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belch, G. E. and M. A. Belch. (1998). Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective, 4th edition, Boston, MA: Irwin-McGraw Hill Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deighton, J. (1996). IDS Financial Services (Condensed). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright, M. E. (1995). IDS Financial Services. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, M. D. and T. W. Speh. (2004). Business Marketing Management: A Strategic View of Industrial and Organizational Markets 8th edition, Mason, Ohio: Thomson South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalra, A. and M. Shi. (2001). “Designing Optimal Sales Contests: A Theoretical Perspective,” Marketing Science 20(2), 170–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreyzsig, E. (1983). Advanced Engineering Mathematics 5th edition, Wiley Eastern Limited.

  • Lazear, E. P. (1998). Personnel Economics for Managers. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, J. E. (1970). “Industrial Advertising Pays Off,” Harvard Business Review 48 (March/April), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. (1993). Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Naik, P. A. and K. Raman. (2003). “Understanding the Impact of Synergy in Multimedia Communications,” Journal of Marketing Research 40(4), 375–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. C. (1990). “Compensating Heterogeneous Salesforces: Some Explicit Solutions,” Marketing Science 9(4), 319–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, D. E. (1993). “Integrated Marketing Communications: Maybe Definition is in the Point of View,” Marketing News 27(2), 17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murali K. Mantrala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murthy, P., Mantrala, M.K. Allocating a Promotion Budget between Advertising and Sales Contest Prizes: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective. Market Lett 16, 19–35 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-1138-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-1138-6

Keywords

Navigation