Journal of Management & Governance

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 723–743 | Cite as

Social accounting as stakeholder knowledge appropriation

  • Michelle Greenwood
  • Ken Kamoche


Heeding the call for socio-political explorations of the social accounting project, we use the analytical lens of knowledge appropriation to explore power and contest in social auditing. We develop a knowledge appropriation model comprising three stages: knowledge creation, knowledge generation and outcome distribution, which we then use to analyze an exemplar case. We argue that, despite asymmetries of power and managerial prerogative, deficient stakeholder involvement in the creation and distribution stages renders social auditing ineffective for governance as either a stakeholder account or a strategic management system. We conclude that embedded stakeholder involvement in knowledge creation processes is essential for social auditing to be effective as corporate governance.


Knowledge appropriation Stakeholders Social accounting Governance Management control The Body Shop 


  1. AccountAbility. (1999). AccountAbility 1000 (AA1000) framework: Standards, guidelines and professional qualification (Exposure draft). London: AccountAbility.Google Scholar
  2. AccountAbility (2008). AA1000 series. Accessed 7 Oct 2008.
  3. Adams, C. A. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reporting performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(5), 731–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams, C. A., & Evans, R. (2004). Accountability, completeness, credibility and the audit expectations gap. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14(Spring), 87–115.Google Scholar
  5. Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Process, 82(1), 150–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ASX (2007). Principles of good corporate governance and best practice recommendations.
  7. Baker, M. (2008) Re-conceiving managerial capture. In R. Burritt (Ed.), 7th Australasian Conference on Social and Environmental Accounting Research (A-CSEAR 2008), Adelaide, Australia, 2008 (pp. 61-78).Google Scholar
  8. Ball, A., Owen, D., & Gray, R. (2000). External transparency or internal capture? The role of third party statements in adding value to corporate environmental reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 9(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boele, R., & Kemp, D. (2005). Social auditors: Illegitimate offspring of the audit family? Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17(Spring), 109–119.Google Scholar
  11. Bowman, C., & Swart, J. (2007). Whose human capital? The challenge of value capture when capital is embedded. Journal of Management Studies, 44(4), 488–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, J., & Fraser, M. (2006). Approaches and perspectives in social and environmental accounting: An overview of the conceptual landscape. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(2), 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chatterji, A., & Levine, D. (2006). Breaking down the wall of codes: Evaluating non-financial performance measurement. California Management Review, 48(2), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, V. L. P., & Creswell, J. W. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Coff, R. W., & Lee, P. M. (2003). Insider trading as a vehicle to appropriate rent from R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Contu, A., & Willmott, H. (2003). Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in Learning Theory. Organization Science, 14(3), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper, S. M., & Owen, D. L. (2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 649–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics, a European perspective: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cummings, J. F. (2001). Engaging stakeholders in corporate accountability programmes: A cross-sectoral analysis of UK and transnational experience. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Currie, G., & Kerrin, M. (2003). Human resource management and knowledge management: Enhancing knowledge sharing in a pharmaceutical company. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(6), 1027–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dando, N., & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance: Minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Clerq, D., & Dimov, D. (2008). Internal knowledge development and external knowledge access in venture capital investment performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effects of social and environmental disclosures—a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dey, C. (2007). Social accounting at Traidcraft plc: A struggle for the meaning of fair trade. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Finkelstein, S., & Peteraf, M. A. (2007). Managerial activities: A missing link in managerial discretion theory. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  27. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gray, R. (2001). Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: What (if anything) have we learnt? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gray, R. (2002). The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(7), 687–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation?: Whose value? Whose creation? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819. doi: 10.1108/09513570610709872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gray, R., Dey, C., Owen, D., Evans, R., & Zadek, S. (1997). Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: Stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(3), 325–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Greenwood, M. (2001). Community as a stakeholder: Focusing on corporate social and environmental reporting. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1(4), 31–45.Google Scholar
  34. Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greenwood, M., & De Cieri, H. (2007). Stakeholder theory and the ethics of human resource management. In A. Pinnington, R. Macklin, & T. Campbell (Eds.), Human resource management ethics and employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. GRI (2006). G3 Sustainability reporting guidelines. Global Reporting Initiative.Google Scholar
  37. Hansen, M. T. (2002). Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3), 232–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaler, J. (2002). Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1), 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kamoche, K. (2006). Managing people in turbulent economic times: A knowledge-creation and appropriation perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kamoche, K., & Mueller, F. (1998). Human resource management and the appropriation-learning perspective. Human Relations, 51(8), 1033.Google Scholar
  41. Kane, A. A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. M. (2004). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kay, J. (1995). Foundations of corporate success: How business strategies add value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Liebeskind, J. P. (1997). Keeping organizational secrets: Protective institutional mechanisms and their costs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(3), 623–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., & Miles, G. (2007). The ideology of innovation. Strategic Organization, 5(4), 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  47. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. O’Dwyer, B. (2001). The legitimacy of accountants’ participation in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Dwyer, B. (2005a). The construction of a social account: A case study in an overseas aid agency. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(3), 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Dwyer, B. (2005b). Stakeholder democracy: Challenges and contributions from social accounting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 14(1), 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Orlitzky, M., & Swanson, D. L. (2002). Value Attunement: Toward a theory of socially responsible executive decision-making. Australian Journal of Management, 27(1_suppl), 119–128. doi: 10.1177/031289620202701s12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ormond, S., Ferlie, E., Warren, F., & Norton, K. (2007). The appropriation of new organizational forms within networks of practice: Founder and founder-related ideological power. Human Relations, 60(5), 745–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  56. Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Owen, D., & Swift, T. (2001). Social accounting, reporting and auditing: Beyond the rhetoric? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Owen, D., Swift, T. A., Humphrey, C., & Bowerman, M. (2000). The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Owen, D., Swift, T., & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Accounting Forum, 25(3), 264–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Peccei, R., & Guest, D. (2002). Trust, exchange and virtuous circles of co-operation: A theoretical and empirical analysis of partnerships at work (Research Paper 011) (Vol. Research Paper 011). London: The Management Centre, King’s College.Google Scholar
  61. Peteraf, M. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191.Google Scholar
  62. Phillips, R. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1), 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Power, M. (1991). Auditing and environmental expertise: Between protest and professionalisation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4(3). 30–42Google Scholar
  64. Power, M. (2004). Counting, control and calculation: Reflections on measuring and management. Human Relations, 57(6), 765–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reed, R., & DeFillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.Google Scholar
  66. Saravanamuthu, K., & Tinker, T. (2003). Politics of managing: the dialectic of control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(1), 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schultz, M., & Hatch, M. J. (2005). Building theory from practice. Strategic Organization, 3(3), 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schultze, U., & Stabell, C. (2004). Knowing what you donít know? Discourses and contradictions in knowledge management research. Journal of Management Studies, 41(4), 549–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shah, R. (2004). The auditor has no clothes. In R. A. Shah, D. F. Murphy, & M. McIntosh (Eds.), Something to believe in. Creating trust and hope in organisations: Stories of transparency, accountability and governance (pp. 166–179). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  70. Sillanpaa, M. (1998). The Body Shop values report: Towards integrated stakeholder auditing. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(13), 1443–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Spence, C. (2009). Social accounting’s emancipatory potential: A Gramscian critique. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), 205–227. doi: 10.1016/ Scholar
  72. SustainAbility. (2007). SustainAbility FAQs. Accessed 25 Nov 2007.
  73. Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of communities of practice’ in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 27–43.Google Scholar
  75. TBS (2000). The new bottom line 2000. Melbourne: The Body Shop Australia.Google Scholar
  76. TBS. (2006). Social performance report: Paving the way forward. Mulgrave, Australia: The Adidem Group.Google Scholar
  77. TBS. (2008). The Body Shop.
  78. Thomson, I., & Bebbington, J. (2005). Social and environmental accounting in the UK: A pedagogic evaluation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(5), 507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. UNEP. (2000). Engaging stakeholders: The global reporters (p. 10). London: SustainAbility and the United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business and EconomicsMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Nottingham Business SchoolNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations