Language Policy

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 3–26 | Cite as

Language management: a snapshot of governmentality within the private schools in Quetta, Pakistan

  • Syed Abdul Manan
  • Maya Khemlani David
  • Francisco Perlas Dumanig
Original Paper


Pakistan is a multilingual and multiethnic country; however, this diversity stands unrecognized in the formal language-in-education policies. Estimates suggest that about 90 % of children who speak over 60 indigenous languages do not have access to education in their mother tongues. Linguists estimate that exclusive teaching of Urdu and English subjects the indigenous languages to physical endangerment as well as negative perceived vitality. This study investigated the language management techniques, practices and discourses of the school authorities about indigenous languages and linguistic diversity, and its effects on perceptions of the students. The study used the theoretical framework of governmentality as introduced by Foucault in The foucault effect: studies in governmentality with two lectures by and an interview with Michael Foucault, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, (1991), which not only focuses on the direct acts of the governing of the state apparatuses, but also addresses the indirect acts of governance that shape individual behaviors. Deploying a mixed methodology that used students of high secondary level, teachers and school principals as sampling in 11 low-fee English-medium private schools in Quetta, Pakistan, the findings suggest that school authorities exercise stringent techniques such as notices, wall paintings, penalties and occasional punishment to suppress the use of languages other than Urdu or English. Mostly, the students also show compliance to the top-down policies. Most of participants perceive indigenous languages as worthless because of their lesser role in professional development and social mobility. The study concludes that the governance methods displace the indigenous languages both physically as well as perceptually. The prevailing orientations look upon languages as commodities, profoundly downgrading the cultural, literary, aesthetic and sociolinguistic dynamics of the indigenous languages.


Governmentality Language management English Urdu Indigenous languages Pakistan 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrabi, T., Das, J., & Khwaja, A. I. (2008). A dime a day: The possibilities and limits of private schooling in Pakistan. Comparative Education Review, 52(3), 329–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres, A. (2003). The politics of language policy in Pakistan. In M. E. Brown & Š. Ganguly (Eds.), Fighting words: Language policy and ethnic relations in Asia (pp. 51–80). Cambridge: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  3. Ayres, A. (2009). Speaking like a state: Language and nationalism in Pakistan. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benson, C. J. (2013). Towards adopting a multilingual habitus in educational development. In C. Benson & K. Kosonen (Eds.), Language issues in comparative education (pp. 1–16): Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canagarajah, S. (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, H. (2010). Teaching and learning in Pakistan: The role of language in education. Islamabad Pakistan: The British Council.Google Scholar
  9. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  10. Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Durrani, M. (2012). Banishing colonial specters: Language ideology and education policy in Pakistan. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 27(1), 29–49.Google Scholar
  12. Ethnologue. (2014). Languages of the World. Retrieved July 20, 2014, from
  13. Ettlinger, N. (2011). Governmentality as epistemology. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(3), 537–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fimyar, O. (2008). Using governmentality as a conceptual tool in education policy research. Educate (special issue), 3–8.Google Scholar
  15. Fishman, J. A. (1979). Bilingual education, language planning, and English. English World-Wide, 1, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality with two lectures by and an interview with Michael Foucault. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (2nd Vintage Books ed.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (2000). The subject and power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of foucault (Vol. 3, pp. 326–348). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (2009). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France : 1977–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. García, O., Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Torres-Guzman, M. E. (2006). Imagining multilingual schools: Languages in education and globalization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  23. GOP. (2001). Census. Islamabad Pakistan: Retrieved from
  24. Haugen, E., & Dil, A. S. (1972). The ecology of language. Essays… Selected and introduced by Anwar S. Dil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Heyneman, S. P., & Stern, J. M. B. (2013). Low cost private schools for the poor: What public policy is appropriate? International Journal of Educational Development, 35, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hornberger, N. H. (2003). Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  27. Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hussain, K. (2013). Rethinking education: Critical discourse and society. Islamabad Pakistan: Narrative Publication.Google Scholar
  29. Jalal, A. (1995). Democracy and authoritarianism in South Asia: A comparative and historical perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jinnah, M. A. (2000). Jinnah: Speeches and statements 1947–1948. Karachi Pakistan: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Khurshid, N. K. (2009). Language education in Pakistan: A postcolonial analysis masters of education, critical studies. New Brunswick: The University of New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  32. Mahboob, A. (2002). No English, no future: Language policy in Pakistan. In S. O. B. Hartford (Ed.), Political independence with linguistic servitude: The politics about languages in the developing world (p. 1042). New York: NOVA Science.Google Scholar
  33. Manan, S. A., & David, M. K. (2013). Mapping ecology of literacies in educational setting: The case of local mother tongues vis-à-vis urdu and english languages in Pakistan. Language and Education, 28(3), 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manan, S. A., David, M. K., & Dumanig, F. P. (forthcoming). Ethnolinguistic dilemma and static maintenance syndrome: A study of languages policies and language perceptions in Pakistan. Language Problems and Language Planning. Google Scholar
  35. Mansoor, S. (1993). Punjabi, urdu, english in Pakistan: A sociolinguistic study. Lahore: Vanguard.Google Scholar
  36. Mansoor, S. (2004a). The medium of instruction dilemma: Implications for language planning in higher education. In S. Mansoor, S. Meraj, & A. Tahir (Eds.), Language policy, planning, and practice: A South Asian perspective. Karachi: Agha Khan University.Google Scholar
  37. Mansoor, S. (2004b). The status and role of regional languages in higher education in Pakistan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25(4), 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mansoor, S. (2005). Language planning in higher education: A case study of Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. May, S. (2001). Language and minority rights. London: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  40. May, S. (2005). Language rights: Moving the debate forward. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 319–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. May, S. (2006). Language policy and minority rights. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 255–272). Malden, Mass: Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  42. McCarty, T. L. (2009). Empowering indigenous languages: What can be learned from native American experiences? In R. P. T. Skutnabb-Kangas, A. K. Mohanty, & M. Panda (Eds.), Linguistic diversity and language rights: Social justice through multilingual education (pp. 125–139). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  43. Menken, K., & García, O. (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Mohanty, A. K. (2010). Languages, inequality and marginalization: Implications of the double divide in Indian multilingualism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 205, 131–154.Google Scholar
  45. Mustafa, Z. (2011). Tyranny of language in education, the problems and its solutions. Karachi: Ushba Publishing International.Google Scholar
  46. Muzaffar, I., & Sharma, A. (2011). Public-private debates in education: Whither private without a public? J-SAPS, 1.Google Scholar
  47. Niesche, R. (2013). Governmentality and my school: school principals in societies of control. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–13.Google Scholar
  48. Pattanayak, D. P. (1998). Mother tongue: An Indian context. In R. Singh (Ed.), The native speaker: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 124–147). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, N.J.; London: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Pennycook, A. (2002). Language policy and docile bodies: Hong Kong and governmentality. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 91–110): Mahwah NJ Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  51. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Phillipson, R., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1996). English only worldwide or language ecology? TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pinnock, H. (2009). Language and education: The missing link, how the language used in schools threatens the achievement of education for all. UK: Save the Children.Google Scholar
  55. Rahman, T. (1996). Language and politics in Pakistan. Karachi; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rahman, T. (1997). The medium of instruction controversy in Pakistan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 18(2), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rahman, T. (1999). Language, education, and culture. Karachi Pakistan: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rahman, T. (2002). Language, ideology and power: Language learning among the Muslims of Pakistan and North India. Karachi; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rahman, T. (2004). Denizens of alien worlds: A study of education, inequality and polarization in Pakistan. Oxford; Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Rahman, T. (2005a). Language policy, multilingualism and language vitality in Pakistan. In A. Saxena & L. Borin (Eds.), Lesser-known languages of South Asia—status and policies, case studies and applications of information technology (pp. 73–106). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  61. Rahman, T. (2005b). Passports to privilege: The English-medium schools in Pakistan. Peace and Democracy in South Asia, 1(1), 24–44.Google Scholar
  62. Ramanathan, V. (2005). The English-Vernacular divide: Postcolonial language politics and practice: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  63. Rassool, N., & Mansoor, S. (2007). Contemporary issues in language, education and development in Pakistan. In N. Rassool (Ed.), Global issues in language, education and development: Perspectives from postcolonial countries (pp. 218–244). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  64. Ricento, T. K., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34.Google Scholar
  66. Shamim, F. (2012). English as the language for development in Pakistan: Issues, challenges and possible solutions. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Language and development: Africa and beyond (pp. 97–118). Addis Ababa Ethiopia: The British Council.Google Scholar
  67. Shohamy, E. G. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches: Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Siddiqui, S. (2012). Education, inequalities and freedom: A sociopolitical critique. Islamabad: Narratives Publication.Google Scholar
  69. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education, or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahwah, N.J.; London: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  70. Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  73. Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 42–59). Malden, Mass: Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  74. Torwali, Z. (2014). The beauty of diversity, The news international. Retrieved from
  75. UNESCO. (1995). The use of the Vernacular in Education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  76. UNESCO. (2014). Language vitality and endangerment Retrieved February 26, 2013, from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Syed Abdul Manan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maya Khemlani David
    • 2
  • Francisco Perlas Dumanig
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of English, Faculty of Arts and Basic SciencesBaluchistan University of IT Engineering and Management SciencesQuettaPakistan
  2. 2.Faculty of Languages and LinguisticsUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations