Abstract
I show that words with indefinite implicit complements occasion a dilemma for their model theory. There has been only two previous attempts to address this problem, one by Fodor and Fodor (1980) and one by Dowty (1981). Each requires that any word tolerating an implicit complement be treated as ambiguous between two different lexical entries and that a meaning postulate or lexical rule be given to constrain suitably the meanings of the various entries for the word. I show that the positing of such an ambiguity runs counter to the facts and propose an alternative solution which does not appeal to ambiguity, meaning postulates or lexical rules. Indeed, I show that the dilemma posed by indefinite implicit complements is posed by all implicit complements and that a general solution to the problem of implicit complements follows from an independently motivated, single treatment of five other problems, that of subcategorization, that of phrasal projections of words, that of defining a model theoretic structure for phrase structure grammars, that of complement polyvalence and that of complement polyadicity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allerton D. J. (1975) Deletion and proform reduction. Journal of Linguistics 11: 213–237
Allerton D. J. (1982) Valency and the English verb. Academic Press, New York
Bach, E. (1964). Subcategories in transformational grammars. In H. Lunt (Ed.), Proceedings of the ninth international congress of linguists (pp. 672–678). The Hague: Mouton and Co.
Bach, K. (1994). Semantic slack: What is said and more. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Foundations of speech act theory: Philosophical and linguistic perspectives (pp. 267–291). London: Routledge.
Bartsch, R., & Vennemann, T. (1972). Semantic structures. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
Bresnan, J. (1982). The passive in lexical theory. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 3–86). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Cappelen H., Hawthorne J. (2009) Relativism and monadic truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cappelen H., Lepore E. (2005) Insensitive semantics. Blackwell, Oxford
Carnap R. (1952) Meaning postulates. Philosophical Studies 3: 65–73
Carpenter, B. (1997). Type-logical semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Chierchia, G., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1990/2000). Meaning and grammar (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Chomsky, N. (1956). Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions of Information Theory, 2(3), 113–124. (Reprinted from Handbook of mathematical psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 105–124), by R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter, Eds., 1963, New York: Wiley).
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton Publishing Co.
Chomsky, N. (1959). On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control, 2(2), 137–167. (Reprinted from Handbook of mathematical psychology, (Vol. 2), pp. 124–155, by R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter, Eds., 1963, New York: Wiley).
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell. (Reprinted from Studies on semantics in generative grammar, pp. 11–62, by N. Chomsky, Ed., 1972, The Hague: Mouton Publishing Co.)
Chung S., Ladusaw W. A., McCloskey J. (1995) Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3: 239–282
Church, A. (1956). Introduction to mathematical logic (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Condoravdi, C., & Gawron, J.-M. (1996). The context-dependency of implicit arguments. In M. Kanazawa, C. J. Piñón, & H. de Swart (Eds.), Quantifiers, deduction, and context (pp. 1–32). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Cresswell, M. J. (1973). Logics and languages. London: Methuen and Co.
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy (Vol. 7). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Dowty, D. (1981). Quantification and the lexicon: A reply to Fodor and Fodor. In M. H. Moortgat & H. v.d. Hoekstra (Eds.), The scope of lexical rules (pp. 79–106). Dordrecht: Foris.
Dowty, D. R., Wall, R. E., & Peters, S. (1981). Introduction to Montague semantics. Synthèse Language Library (Vol. 11). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Emonds, J. (1972). Evidence that indirect object movement is a structure preserving rule. Foundations of Language, 8, 546–561.
Enderton, H. B. (1972/2001). A mathematical introduction to logic (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt/Academic Press.
Fillmore, C. (1986). Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (Vol. 12, pp. 95–107). Berkeley, CA: BLS.
Fodor, J., & Fodor, J. D. (1980). Functional structure, quantifiers and meaning postulates. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 759–769.
Gillon, B. S. (2004). Ambiguity, indeterminacy, deixis and vagueness: Evidence and theory. In S. Davis & B. Gillon (Eds.), Semantics: A reader (pp. 157–187). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gillon, B. S. (2011). French relational words, context sensitivity and implicit complement arguments. Current Research in the Semantics–Pragmatics Interface (Making Semantics Pragmatic), 24, 143–163.
Gillon, B. S. (in press). Optional complements of English verbs and adjectives. In R. de Almeida & C. Manouilidou (Eds.), Verb concepts: Cognitive science perspectives on verb representation and processing.
Grimshaw J. (1979) Complement selection and the Lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10(2): 279–326
Groefsema M. (1995) Understood arguments: A semantic/pragmatic approach. Lingua 96: 139–161
Heim I., Kratzer A. (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell, Oxford
Hodges W. (1997) A shorter model theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Huddleston, R. (2002). The clause: Complements. In R. Huddleston & G. K. Pullum (Eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language (Chap. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iten, C., Junker, M.-O., Pyke, A., Stainton, R., & Wearing, C. (2004). The semantics and syntax of null complements (unpublished).
Iten, C., Junker, M.-O., Pyke, A., Stainton, R., & Wearing, C. (2005). Null complements: licensed by syntax or by semantics-pragmatics? In Proceedings of the 2004 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.
Jackendoff, R. S. (1973). The base rules for prepositional phrases. In S. R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 345–356). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Jackendoff, R. (1989). What is a concept, that a person may grasp it. Mind and Language, 4, 68–102. (Reprinted from Semantics: A reader, pp. 322–345, by S. Davis & B. Gillon, Eds., 2004, Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. London, England: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic: Introduction to model theoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy (Vol. 42). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kaplan, D. (1977). Demonstratives. (Reprinted from Semantics: A reader, pp. 749–789, by S. Davis & B. Gillon, Eds., 2004, Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Katz, J. J. (1972). Semantic theory. New York: Harper and Row.
Kenny, A. (1963). Action, emotion and will. London: Routledge, Kegan-Paul.
Klein E. (1980) A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4(1): 1–45
Klein E., Sag I. A. (1985) Type-driven translation. Linguistics and Philosophy 8(2): 163–201
Klima, E. S. (1965). Studies in diachronic syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
Lakoff, G. (1972). Linguistics and natural language. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 545–665). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Langendoen D. T. (1978) The logic of reciprocity. Linguistic Inquiry 9(2): 177–197
Larson, R., & Segal, G. (1995). Knowledge of meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Lees, R. B. (1963). The grammar of English nominalizations. Publication… of the Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics (Vol. 12). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
Levin, L. (1982). Sluicing: A lexical interpretation procedure. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 590–654). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Levine, R. D., & Meurers, W. D. (2006). Head-driven phrase structure grammar: Linguistic approach, formal foundations and computational realization. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.
Lewis, D. (1972). General semantics. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 169–218). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Manaster Ramer A., Kac M. B. (1990) The concept of phrase structure. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 325–362
Marker D. (2002) Model theory: An introduction. Springer, Berlin
Merchant J. (2001) The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Merchant, J. (2006). Sluicing. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The syntax companion (Chap. 60, Vol. 5). London: Blackwell.
Partee, B. (1989). Binding implicit variables in quantified contexts. Papers from Twenty-fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 342–365.
Pupier P. (1973) Observations sur les prédicats converses. Cahiers de Linguistique, 2: 63–84
Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Rice, S. (1988). Unlikely lexical entries. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (Vol. 14, pp. 202–212). Berkeley CA: BLS.
Rosenbloom P.C. (1950) Elements of mathematical logic. Dover, New York
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Rothmaler, P. (2000). An introduction to model theory. New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
Sag I. A., Gazdar G., Wasow T., Weisler S. (1985) Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3(2): 117–171
Sag, I., Wasow, T., & Bender, E. M. (1999/2003). Syntactic theory: A formal introduction (2nd ed.). CSLI Lecture Notes: no. 152. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Schachter P. (1962) Review of Lees 1963. International Journal of American Linguistics 28(2): 134–145
Sweet H. (1900) English grammar: Logical and historical (2 Vols.). Clarendon Press, Oxford
Tarski, A. (1935/1956). The concept of truth in formalized languages. In J. H. Woodger (Trans.) Logic, semantics, metamathematics (2nd ed., pp. 152–178). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Edited and Introduced by J. Corcoran, Indianopolis, IN, Hackett Publishing Company).
Thomason, R. (Ed.). (1974). Formal philosophy. The papers of Richard Montague. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Wasow, T. (1977). Transformations and the lexicon. In P. Culicover, A. Akmajian, & T. Wasow (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 327–360). New York: Academic Press.
Whitman N. (2004) Semantics and pragmatics of English verbal dependent coordination. Language 80(3): 403–434
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gillon, B.S. Implicit complements: a dilemma for model theoretic semantics. Linguist and Philos 35, 313–359 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-012-9120-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-012-9120-2