Advertisement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 7–28 | Cite as

Science Teacher Preparation in a North American Context

  • Joanne K. Olson
  • Christine D. Tippett
  • Todd M. Milford
  • Chris Ohana
  • Michael P. Clough
Article

Abstract

This article provides a description of science teacher education policy in Canada and the USA. We focus on qualifications and procedures to obtain an initial teaching license, requirements for license renewal, and trends in our respective countries. In both countries, science teacher education is the responsibility of the province or state, rather than the federal government. Because these countries are composed of many provinces/states, each with its own unique characteristics, we focus on general trends, recognizing that exceptions to these trends exist. Our review indicates that science teacher education in Canada and the USA consists of a highly diverse array of licenses, requirements, and programs. While this variability provides flexibility for programs to meet local needs and to create innovative programs, it also creates the potential for teachers to enter classrooms with insufficient preparation. In both countries, multiple pathways lead to certification, many of which have very few science content or science pedagogy requirements. The science content knowledge required of elementary teachers is of concern in both countries. Secondary science teachers have multiple ways to teach with insufficient preparation in science content and pedagogy. The nature of science is notably absent from most science teacher education state and provincial requirements. Innovative program structures with high requirements for science content and pedagogy exist in both countries. Research is needed that compares program structures and requirements to determine their relative impact on teachers’ practices. Additionally, much remains to be done to improve the extent to which existing research influences policy.

Keywords

Science teacher education North America Teacher education policy Licensing 

References

  1. American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education (AACTE). (2014). About edTPA: Overview. Retrieved from http://edtpa.aacte.org/about-edtpa#Overview-0
  2. Aschiek, S. (2014). Provincial funding for private schools. Retrieved from http://www.ourkids.net/school/article.php?id=8
  3. Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada (AUCC). (2014). University study programs in Canada. Retrieved from http://www.aucc.ca/canadian-universities/study-programs/
  4. Backhus, D. A., & Thompson, K. W. (2006). Addressing the nature of science in preservice science teacher preparation programs: Science educator perceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  6. Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. M., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.Google Scholar
  7. Barter, B. (2011). Rural practices as evidence for teacher education programs. In T. Falkenburg & H. Smits (Eds.), The question of evidence in research in teacher education in the context of teacher education program review in Canada (pp. 23–44). Winnipeg, MB: Faculty of Education of the University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
  8. BC Ministry of Education. (2014). Types of certificates issued by the teacher regulation branch of the Ministry of Education. Retrieved from https://www.bcteacherregulation.ca/Teacher/CertificatesIssued.aspx
  9. Bergman, D. J. (2014). Teacher licensure change not in best interest of children, state. The Wichita Eagle. Retrieved from http://www.kansas.com/2014/04/24/3419842/daniel-bergman-teacher-licensure.html
  10. Bishop’s University. (2011). Undergraduate courses and programs. Retrieved from http://www.ubishops.ca/academic-programs/gse/undergraduate-courses-programs.html
  11. Bleicher, R. E. (2007). Nurturing confidence in preservice elementary science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 841–860. doi: 10.1007/s10972-007-9067-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 416–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Canadian College of Educators. (2014). Certificate in adult education. Retrieved from http://canadiancollegeofeducators.ca/certificate-in-adult-education/
  14. Century, J., Rudnick, M., & Freeman, C. (2008). Accumulating knowledge on elementary science specialists: A strategy for building conceptual clarity and sharing findings. Science Education, 17(2), 31–44.Google Scholar
  15. Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. M. (2014). Future teacher preparation research: An overview of the field, part 1. Journal of Teacher Education. Retrieved from http://jte.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/09/03/0022487114549072
  16. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC). (2008a). The development of education: Reports for Canada. Toronto, ON: Author.Google Scholar
  18. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC). (2008b). Education in Canada. Toronto, ON: Author.Google Scholar
  19. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC). (2014). About. Retrieved from http://www.cmec.ca/11/About/index.html
  20. Crocker, R., & Dibbon, D. (2008). Teacher education in Canada: A baseline study. Kelowna, BC: Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education.Google Scholar
  21. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/
  22. Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 390–441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76, 607–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dolphin, G. R., & Tillotson, J. W. (in press). “Uncentering” teacher beliefs: The expressed epistemologies of secondary science teachers and how they relate to teacher practice. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education.Google Scholar
  25. Druva, C. A., & Anderson, R. D. (1983). Science teacher characteristics by teaching behavior and student outcome: A meta-analysis of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Educational Testing Service. (2013).  Praxis core academic skills for educators tests overview. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/praxis/about/core
  27. Gambhir, M., Broad, K., Evans, M., & Gaskell, J. (2008). Characterizing initial teacher education in Canada: Themes and issues. Retrieved from http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/ite/UserFiles/File/CharacterizingITE.pdf
  28. Goldberg, F., Robinson, S., & Otero, V. (2007). Physics and everyday thinking. Mount Kisco, NY: It’s About Time.Google Scholar
  29. Goldhaber, D. D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Government of Alberta. (2014). CERTIFICATIONAlberta education. Retrieved from http://www.education.alberta.ca/teachers/certification.aspx
  31. Government of Saskatchewan. (2014). Teacher certification. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.sk.ca/educator-faq-teacher-certification
  32. Guyton, E., & Farokhi, E. (1987). Relationships among academic performance, basic skills, subject matter knowledge, and teaching skills of teacher education graduates. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(5), 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2013a). Teachers’ nature of science implementation practices 2–5 years after having completed an intensive science education program. Science Education, 97, 271–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2013b). Association between experienced teachers’ NOS implementation and reform-based practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 1077–1102.Google Scholar
  35. Internal Trade Secretariat. (2012). Agreement on internal trade. Retrieved from http://www.ait-aci.ca/index_en/ait.htm
  36. Ihrig, L. M. (2014). The effects of socialization on beginning science teachers’ pedagogical decision making and science instruction (Unpublished dissertation). Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  37. Indiana Department of Education. (2014). Assignment codes. Retrieved from http://www.doe.in.gov/sites/default/files/licensing/high-1-school-12213.pdf
  38. Johnson, S. M., Birkeland, S. E., & Peske, H. G. (2005). A difficult balance: Incentives and quality control in alternative certification programs. Project on the next generation of teachers. Cambridge: Harvard Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
  39. Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. The education schools project. Retrieved from http://www.edschools.org/pdf/Educating_Teachers_Report.pdf
  40. MacDonald, R. J. (2010). Bridging the theory–practice divide: Teaching science methods off campus. In T. Falkenburg & H. Smits (Eds.), Field experiences in the context of reform of Canadian teacher education programs (pp. 261–273). Winnipeg, MB: Faculty of Education of the University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
  41. McMurrer, J. (2008). Instructional time in elementary schools: A closer look at changes for specific subjects, a report in the series, from the capitol to the classroom: Year 5 of the no child left behind act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.Google Scholar
  42. Milford, T. M. (2013). Canada: British Columbia. In B. Vlaardinerbroek & N. Taylor (Eds.), Issues in upper secondary science education: Comparative perspectives. Palgrave: New York, NY.Google Scholar
  43. Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13, 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. (2014). Certification and licensure state policy database. Retrieved from http://www.mb2.ecs.org/reports/reportTQ.aspx?id=1137
  45. National Council on Teacher Quality. (2014). 2014 teacher prep review. Washington, DC: NCTQ.Google Scholar
  46. National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  47. National Science Teachers Association. (2012). Standards for science teacher preparation. Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  48. Office of the Federal Register. (2014). Proposed rule: Teacher preparation issues. Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/12/03/2014-28218/teacher-preparation-issues
  49. Ohana, C., Miller, M., & Hanley, D. (2013). Re-envisioning teacher preparation for science in Washington State. Washington State Kappa, 6(2). Retrieved from http://journals.lib.washington.edu/index.php/wsk/article/view/14507
  50. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2014). Ontario College of Teachers Act, 1996. Retrieved from http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/regs/english/elaws_regs_100176_e.htm
  51. Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Houts, R., & Morrison, F. (2007). Teaching: Opportunities to learn in America’s elementary classrooms. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Early Child Care Research Network. Science, 315, 1795–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Province of Nova Scotia. (2014). Teacher certification. Retrieved from https://certification.ednet.ns.ca/
  53. Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2006). Does one size fit all? The induction experience of beginning science teachers from different teacher preparation programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 963–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rowan, B., Chiang, F. S., & Miller, R. J. (1997). Using research on employees’ performance to study the effects of teachers on students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 70, 256–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sangueza, C. R. (2010). Pre-service elementary science teaching self-efficacy and teaching practices: A mixed-methods, dual-phase, embedded case study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
  56. Sherman, A., & MacDonald, L. (2007). Pre-service teachers’ experiences with a science education module. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 525–541. doi: 10.1007/s10972-007-9049-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. South Dakota Department of Education. (2014). Certification process. Retrieved from http://www.doe.sd.gov/oatq/teachercert.aspx
  58. State of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2014a). Single subject teaching credential requirements for teachers prepared in California. Retrieved from http://www.ctc.ca.gov/credentials/leaflets/cl560c.pdf
  59. State of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing. (2014b). Supplementary authorizations for multiple subject and standard elementary teaching credentials. Retrieved from http://www.ctc.ca.gov/credentials/leaflets/cl629.pdf
  60. State of New Jersey Department of Education. (2014). Getting certified in New Jersey. Retrieved from http://www.state.nj.us/education/tttnj/cert/
  61. Statistics Canada. (2013). Population by year, by province and territory. Retrieved from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&retrLang=eng&id=0510001&paSer=&pattern=&stByVal=1&p1=1&p2=37&tabMode=dataTable&csid=
  62. Teach for America. (2012). Summer training. Retrieved from http://www.teachforamerica.org/why-teach-for-america/training-and-support/summer-training
  63. Tillotson, J. W., & Young, M. J. (2013). The IMPPACT project: A model for studying how preservice program experiences influence science teachers’ beliefs and practices. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1, 148–161.Google Scholar
  64. Trygstad, P. J. (2013). 2012 national survey of science and mathematics education: Status of elementary school science. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.Google Scholar
  65. University of Alberta. (2014). Elementary education route. Retrieved from http://www.registrar.ualberta.ca/calendar/Undergrad/Education/Programs/75.3.html#75.3
  66. University of Manitoba, Faculty of Graduate Studies. (2014). Canadian GPA equivalency table. Retrieved from http://umanitoba.ca/faculties/graduate_studies/admin/570.html
  67. University of Regina. (2013). Secondary education. Retrieved from http://www.uregina.ca/futurestudents/programs/degree-programs/secondary-education.html
  68. University of Victoria. (2014). Elementary BEd post-degree professional program (PDPP). Retrieved from http://www.uvic.ca/education/prospective/teacher/programs/elmpdpp/index.php
  69. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education. (2006). The secretary’s fifth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  70. U.S. Department of Labor. (2014). Bureau of labor statistics: Occupational outlook handbook. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/ooh/education-training-and-library/kindergarten-and-elementary-school-teachers.htm
  71. Van der Flier-Keller, E., Blades, D. V., & Milford, T. (2011). Promoting earth science teaching and learning: Inquiry-based activities and resources anchoring teacher professional development and education. In L. D. Yore, E. Van der Flier-Keller, D. W. Blades, T. W. Pelton, & D. B. Zandvliet (Eds.), Pacific CRYSTAL centre for science, mathematics, and technology literacy: Lessons learned (pp. 165–183). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Van Nuland, S. (2011). Teacher education in Canada. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37, 409–421.Google Scholar
  73. Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Washington: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  74. Windschitl, M. (2005). Guest editorial: The future of science teacher preparation in America: Where is the evidence to inform program design and guide responsible policy decisions? Science Education, 89, 525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. (2014). Chapter PI 34: Teacher education program approval and licenses. Retrieved from http://docs.legis.wi.gov/code/admin_code/pi/34.pdf
  76. Yukon College. (2014). EducationYukon native teacher. Retrieved from http://www.yukoncollege.yk.ca/programs/view/yntep

Copyright information

© The Association for Science Teacher Education, USA 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanne K. Olson
    • 1
  • Christine D. Tippett
    • 2
  • Todd M. Milford
    • 3
  • Chris Ohana
    • 4
  • Michael P. Clough
    • 5
  1. 1.Iowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.University of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  4. 4.Western Washington UniversityBellinghamUSA
  5. 5.Iowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations