Exploring a Model of Situated Professional Development: Impact on Classroom Practice
- 523 Downloads
A hallmark of current science education reform involves teaching through inquiry. However, the widespread use of inquiry-based instruction in many classrooms has not occurred (Roehrig and Luft in Int J Sci Educ 26:3–24, 2004; Schneider et al. in J Res Sci Teach 42:283–312, 2005). The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of a professional development program on middle school science teachers’ ability to enact inquiry-based pedagogical practices. Data were generated through evaluation of teacher practice using the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) (Sawada et al. in School Sci Math 102:245–253, 2002) at three distinct junctures, before, during, and after the professional development treatment. Analysis of teacher-participant post-institute reflections was then utilized to determine the perceived role of the various institute components. Statistical significant changes in RTOP scores indicated that the teachers were able to successfully transfer the enactment of the inquiry-based practices into their classrooms. The subsequent discussion provides connection between these pedagogical changes with use of professional development strategies that provide a situated learning environment.
KeywordsProfessional development Middle school Inquiry Controlled practice
The National Science Foundation Teacher Professional Continuum Program (DESIE-0455811) provided funding for the research described in this paper.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8.Google Scholar
- Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
- Coffey, A., & Atkins, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Corcoran, T. B., Shields, P. M., & Zucker, A. A. (1998). The SSIs and professional development for teachers. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
- Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappn, 76, 597.Google Scholar
- Duschl, R. A. (1987). Abandoning the scientific legacy of science education. Science Education, 22, 51–62.Google Scholar
- Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., & Tal, R. (2002, April). A design approach to professional development: Linking teacher and student learning in systemic reform. In Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Gates, H. (2008). Middle school science teachers’ perspectives and practices of teaching through inquiry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
- Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 51–94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., Borko, H., Schneider, C., Pittman, M. E., Eiteljog, E., Bunning, K., & Frykholm, J. (2007). The problem-solving cycle: A model to support the development of teachers’ professional knowledge. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 273–303.Google Scholar
- Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (2002). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.Google Scholar
- Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Marx, R. W., Freeman, J. G., Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1998). Professional development of science teachers. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 667–680). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Morine-Dershimer, G., & Kent, T. (1999). The complex nature of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 21–50). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Mouza, C. (2002). Learning to teach with new technology: Implications for professional development. Journal of Research on Technology Education, 4, 272–289.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Piburn, M., Sawada, D., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP) reference manual. (ACEPT Technical Report No. IN00-3). Retrieved July 29, 2007 from http://PhysicsEd.BuffaloState.Edu/AZTEC/rtop/RTOP_full/PDF/.
- Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.Google Scholar
- Ruth, L. (2007). Impacts of project-based science in middle school classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
- South Carolina State Department of Education. (2007). School accountability data. Retrieved July 29, 2007 from http://ed.sc.gov/agency/Accountability/Data-Management-and-Analysis/QuickDataPortal.html.
- Sparks, D., & Hirsh, S. (2000). A national plan for improving professional development. Retrieved May 1, 2005 from http://www.nsdc.org/library/authors/NSCDCPlan.cfm.
- Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.Google Scholar