The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 316–342 | Cite as

The innovation activities of small and medium-sized enterprises and their growth: quantile regression analysis and structural equation modeling

Article

Abstract

Using an augmented version of Gibrat’s law, we theorized the relationship between the innovation activities of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and their growth in sales, firm value, and research and development (R&D) investment in the following years. Based on 17 years of data from 598 SMEs in South Korea, this study examined the mediating role of sales growth and firm value growth in the relationship between innovation activities and R&D investment growth in a longitudinal setting. The study findings suggested that the innovation activities of SMEs at Time 1 influenced the sales growth of high-growth firms and high-tech sectors at Time 2 more positively than that of low-growth firms and low-tech sectors, and that SMEs consequently invested more in R&D at Time 3. However, the innovation activities of SMEs at Time 1 did not significantly affect their firm value growth at Time 2. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed for scholars, managers, and policy makers.

Keywords

Innovation activities Firm growth R&D Quantile regression Small and medium-sized enterprises 

JEL Classification

O32 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their considerable help in developing this manuscript. This manuscript was supported by a Korea University Grant. Please send theoretical inquiries to the corresponding author, Jeewhan Yoon (Email: towny@korea.ac.kr) and send analytical inquiries to the cocorresponding author, YoungJun Kim (Email: youngjkim@korea.ac.kr).

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 757–774. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardishvili, A., Cardozo, S., Harmon, S., & Vadakath, S. (1998). Towards a theory of new venture growth. Paper presented at the Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Ghent, Belgium.Google Scholar
  3. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In National Bureau of Economic Research (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2144.
  4. Audretsch, D. B., Coad, A., & Segarra, A. (2014). Firm growth and innovation. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 743–749. doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9560-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Audretsch, D. B., Klomp, L., Santarelli, E., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). Gibrat’s law: Are the services different? Review of Industrial Organization, 24(3), 301–324. doi: 10.1023/B:REIO.0000038273.50622.ec.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azevedo, J. P. (2011). grqreg: Stata module to graph the coefficients of a quantile regression. Boston, MA: Boston College Department of Economics. http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/g/grqreg.ado.
  7. Bartelsman, E., Dobbelaere, S., & Peters, B. (2014). Allocation of human capital and innovation at the frontier: Firm-level evidence on Germany and the Netherlands. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Tinbergen Institute. Retrieved from http://papers.tinbergen.nl/13095.pdf.
  8. Bellucci, A., & Pennacchio, L. (2015). University knowledge and firm innovation: Evidence from European countries. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 730–752. doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9408-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bianchini, S., Pellegrino, G., & Tamagni, F. (2014). Innovation strategies and firm growth: New longitudinal evidence from Spanish firms (Working paper). Retrieved from http://www.dipecodir.it/upload/file/Workshop%20Explaining%20Economic%20Change/Innovation%20Strategies%20and%20Firm%20Growth_%20New%20longitudinal%20evidence%20from%20spanish%20firms_pdf.pdf.
  10. Blass, A., & Yosha, O. (2003). Financing R&D in mature companies: An empirical analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(5), 425–447. doi: 10.1080/1043859022000029249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bosworth, D., & Rogers, M. (2001). Market value, R&D and intellectual property: An empirical analysis of large Australian firms. The Economic Record, 77(239), 323–337. doi: 10.1111/1475-4932.t01-1-00026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bottazzi, G., Dosi, G., Lippi, M., Pammolli, F., & Riccaboni, M. (2001). Innovation and corporate growth in the evolution of the drug industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(7), 1161–1187. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7187(01)00068-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bottazzi, G., & Secchi, A. (2003). Common properties and sectoral specificities in the dynamics of US manufacturing companies. Review of Industrial Organization, 23(3–4), 217–232. doi: 10.1023/B:REIO.0000031366.28559.c1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bourgeois, L. J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29–39. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1981.4287985.Google Scholar
  15. Boxall, P., Ang, S. H., & Bartram, T. (2011). Analysing the ‘black box’ of HRM: Uncovering HR goals, mediators, and outcomes in a standardized service environment. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 1504–1532. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00973.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, J. R., Fazzari, S. M., & Petersen, B. C. (2009). Financing innovation and growth: Cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. The Journal of Finance, 64(1), 151–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01431.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, J. R., Martinsson, G., & Petersen, B. C. (2012). Do financing constraints matter for R&D? European Economic Review, 56(8), 1512–1529. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Capasso, M., Treibich, T., & Verspagen, B. (2015). The medium-term effect of R&D on firm growth. Small Business Economics, 45(1), 39–62. doi: 10.1007/s11187-015-9640-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chan, S. H., Martin, J. D., & Kensinger, J. W. (1990). Corporate research and development expenditures and share value. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 255–276. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(90)90005-K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chauvin, K. W., & Hirschey, M. (1993). Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm. Financial Management, 22(4), 128–140. doi: 10.2307/3665583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chesher, A. (1979). Testing the law of proportionate effect. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4), 403–411. doi: 10.2307/2097961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cho, H. J., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 555–575. doi: 10.1002/smj.461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Coad, A. (2007). A closer look at serial growth rate correlation. Review of Industrial Organization, 31(1), 69–82. doi: 10.1007/s11151-007-9135-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coad, A. (2009). The growth of firms: A survey of theories and empirical evidence. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. http://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781848443273.xml.
  25. Coad, A. (2010). Exploring the processes of firm growth: Evidence from a vector auto-regression. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1677–1703. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtq018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2006). Innovation and market value: A quantile regression analysis. Economic Bulletin, 15(13), 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/EB/2006/Volume15/EB-06O10012A.pdf.
  27. Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37(4), 633–648. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2010). Firm growth and R&D expenditure. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(2), 127–145. doi: 10.1080/10438590802472531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016). Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role? Research Policy, 45(2), 387–400. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. doi: 10.2307/2393553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Colombelli, A., Haned, N., & Le Bas, C. (2013). On firm growth and innovation: Some new empirical perspectives using French CIS (1992–2004). Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 26, 14–26. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2013.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2006). Conceptual and empirical challenges in the study of firm growth. In P. Davidsson, F. Delmar, & J. Wiklund (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and the growth of firms (pp. 39–61). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/1845425758.00010.xml.
  33. Del Monte, A., & Papagni, E. (2003). R&D and the growth of firms: Empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms. Research Policy, 32(6), 1003–1014. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00107-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00080-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Demirel, P., & Mazzucato, M. (2012). Innovation and firm growth: Is R&D worth it? Industry and Innovation, 19(1), 45–62. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2012.649057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Deschryvere, M. (2014). R&D, firm growth and the role of innovation persistence: An analysis of Finnish SMEs and large firms. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 767–785. doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9559-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Doukas, J., & Switzer, L. (1992). The stock market’s valuation of R&D spending and market concentration. Journal of Economics and Business, 44(2), 95–114. doi: 10.1016/0148-6195(92)90009-Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Falk, M. (2012). Quantile estimates of the impact of R&D intensity on firm performance. Small Business Economics, 39(1), 19–37. doi: 10.1007/s11187-010-9290-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Freel, M. S. (2000). Do small innovating firms outperform non-innovators? Small Business Economics, 14(3), 195–210. doi: 10.1023/A:1008100206266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. García-Manjón, J. V., & Romero-Merino, M. E. (2012). Research, development, and firm growth. Empirical evidence from European top R&D spending firms. Research Policy, 41(6), 1084–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Geroski, P. A. (2005). Understanding the implications of empirical work on corporate growth rates. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26(2), 129–138. doi: 10.1002/mde.1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Geroski, P. A., & Toker, S. (1996). The turnover of market leaders in UK manufacturing industry, 1979–86. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(2), 141–158. doi: 10.1016/0167-7187(95)00479-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gibrat, R. (1931). Les inégalités économiques. Paris: Recueil Sirey.Google Scholar
  44. Goedhuys, M., & Sleuwaegen, L. (2010). High-growth entrepreneurial firms in Africa: A quantile regression approach. Small Business Economics, 34(1), 31–51. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9193-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gunasekaran, A., Putnik, G. D., Peças, P., & Henriques, E. (2006). Best practices of collaboration between university and industrial SMEs. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13(1/2), 54–67. doi: 10.1108/14635770610644574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In B. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 609–639). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2.
  47. Hall, B. H., & Oriani, R. (2006). Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, Germany, and Italy. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(5), 971–993. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Helfat, C. E. (1994). Firm-specificity in corporate applied R&D. Organization Science, 5(2), 173–184. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.2.173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 339–360. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<339:AID-SMJ883>3.0.CO;2-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Boronat-Moll, C. (2014). Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: A misleading debate? Small Business Economics, 43(4), 873–886. doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9567-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Holcomb, T. R., Holmes, R. M., Jr., & Connelly, B. L. (2009). Making the most of what you have: Managerial ability as a source of resource value creation. Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 457–485. doi: 10.1002/smj.747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hölzl, W. (2009). Is the R&D behaviour of fast-growing SMEs different? Evidence from CIS III data for 16 countries. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 59–75. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9182-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hsu, P.-H., Tian, X., & Xu, Y. (2014). Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(1), 116–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Koenker, R., & Bassett, G., Jr. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50. doi: 10.2307/1913643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111–133. doi: 10.1023/A:1007895322042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Liu, J.-T., Tsou, M.-W., & Hammitt, J. K. (1999). Do small plants grow faster? Evidence from the Taiwan electronics industry. Economics Letters, 65(1), 121–129. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00126-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lockett, A., Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., & Girma, S. (2011). Organic and acquisitive growth: Re-examining, testing and extending Penrose’s growth theory. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 48–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00879.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lukach, R., Kort, P. M., & Plasmans, J. (2007). Optimal R&D investment strategies under the threat of new technology entry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(1), 103–119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry, Gibrat’s law, innovation, and the growth of firms. The American Economic Review, 52(5), 1023–1051. http://www.jstor.org.oca.korea.ac.kr/stable/1812180.
  60. Marris, R. (1999). Edith Penrose and economics. Contributions to Political Economy, 18(1), 47–65. doi: 10.1093/cpe/18.1.47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mata, J., & Woerter, M. (2013). Risky innovation: The impact of internal and external R&D strategies upon the distribution of returns. Research Policy, 42(2), 495–501. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mazzucato, M., & Parris, S. (2015). High-growth firms in changing competitive environments: The US pharmaceutical industry (1963 to 2002). Small Business Economics, 44(1), 145–170. doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9583-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 740–760. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2011.64870100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ndofor, H. A., Sirmon, D. G., & He, X. (2011). Firm resources, competitive actions and performance: Investigating a mediated model with evidence from the in vitro diagnostics industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32(6), 640–657. doi: 10.1002/smj.901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Oriani, R., & Sobrero, M. (2008). Uncertainty and the market valuation of R&D within a real options logic. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 343–361. doi: 10.1002/smj.664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Phillips, A. (1971). Technology and market structure: A study of the aircraft industry. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  67. Reiche, B. S., Kraimer, M. L., & Harzing, A.-W. (2011). Why do international assignees stay? An organizational embeddedness perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(4), 521–544. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2011.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rodríguez, A., & Nieto, M. J. (2015). Does R&D offshoring lead to SME growth? Different governance modes and the mediating role of innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1734–1753. doi: 10.1002/smj.2413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Roper, S. (1997). Product innovation and small business growth: A comparison of the strategies of German, UK and Irish companies. Small Business Economics, 9(6), 523–537. doi: 10.1023/A:1007963604397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Roper, S., Du, J., & Love, J. H. (2008). Modelling the innovation value chain. Research Policy, 37(6–7), 961–977. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schimke, A., & Brenner, T. (2011). Temporal structure of firm growth and the impact of R&D (Working Paper No. 32). Karlsruhe, Germany: Karlsruher Institut für Technologie. Retrieved from http://econpapers.wiwi.kit.edu/downloads/KITe_WP_32.pdf.
  72. Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2014). High-growth firms and innovation: An empirical analysis for Spanish firms. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 805–821. doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9563-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312. doi: 10.2307/270723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Toivanen, O., Stoneman, P., & Bosworth, D. (2002). Innovation and the market value of UK firms, 1989–1995. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64(1), 39–61. doi: 10.1111/1468-0084.00002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang, T., & Thornhill, S. (2010). R&D investment and financing choices: A comprehensive perspective. Research Policy, 39(9), 1148–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weinzimmer, L. G., Nystrom, P. C., & Freeman, S. J. (1998). Measuring organizational growth: Issues, consequences and guidelines. Journal of Management, 24(2), 235–262. doi: 10.1177/014920639802400205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Williamson, O. E. (1988). Corporate finance and corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 43(3), 567–591. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb04592.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Woolridge, J. R. (1988). Competitive decline and corporate restructuring: Is a myopic stock market to blame? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1(1), 26–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.1988.tb00155.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yang, C.-H., & Huang, C.-H. (2005). R&D, size and firm growth in Taiwan’s electronics industry. Small Business Economics, 25(5), 477–487. doi: 10.1007/s11187-004-6487-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yu, H.-C., Chen, C.-S., & Hsieh, D.-T. (2010). Keiretsu style main bank relationships, R&D investment, leverage, and firm value: Quantile regression approach. In C.-F. Lee, J. Lee, & A. C. Lee (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative finance and risk management (pp. 829–841). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77117-5_53.
  82. Zantout, Z. Z., & Tsetsekos, G. P. (1994). The wealth effects of announcements of R&D expenditure increases. Journal of Financial Research, 17(2), 205–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6803.1994.tb00186.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zeng, S. X., Xie, X., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Management of TechnologyKorea UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations