Advertisement

The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 346–350 | Cite as

Commentary on Gregory Tassey’s “Rationales and mechanisms for revitalizing US manufacturing R&D strategies”

  • Christopher T. Hill
Article

Gregory Tassey has written a brilliant, although not flawless, analysis of the technological challenges to American manufacturing and of actions that should be taken by both business and government to ensure that American manufacturing’s future is bright. Tassey has long been an astute observer and analyst of American science, technology, and innovation policies. His paper is both a synthesis of many of his earlier contributions and a significant extension into new realms of understanding.

Tassey’s fundamental thesis is that the decline in American manufacturing’s contributions to GDP and private employment, as well as its decline in shares of world trade, can be attributed in substantial measure to two factors. The first is that there is a national consensus around models of how technology is developed and used that fails to account for both vertical disintegration along supply chains and the speed of change. Second, because of American aversion to the involvement of government in the...

Keywords

Supply Chain American Manufacturer American Manufacturing Major Industrial Country Social Welfare State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Dertouzos, M. L., et al. (1989). Made in America: Regaining the productive edge. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Executive Office of the President. (2009). A framework for revitalizing American manufacturing.Google Scholar
  3. Geoghegan, T. (2010 March) Consider the Germans. Harpers Magazine, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
  4. Hill, C. T. (1992). New manufacturing paradigms—new manufacturing policies. In The Bridge (Vol. 21, pp. 15–24). Number 1, Summer 1991. Reprinted in Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 41, 351–363.Google Scholar
  5. Hill, C. T. (2007). The Post Scientific Society. Issues in Science and Technology, 24, 78–84.Google Scholar
  6. Kahin, B., & Hill, C. T. (2010). United States: The need for continuity (in Innovation Policy). Issues in Science and Technology, 26, 51–60.Google Scholar
  7. McCormack, R. (Ed.). (2009). Manufacturing a better future for America, alliance for American Manufacturing. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. Mettler, R. F., & Hill, C. T. (1993). Forging the future: Policy for American manufacturing. Report of the Manufacturing Subcouncil to the Competitiveness Policy Council.Google Scholar
  9. Phillips-Fein, K. (2009). Invisible hands: The businessmen’s crusade against the new deal. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Womack, J. P., Daniel, D., & Roos, T. J. (1990). The machine that changed the world. New York: Rawson Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public PolicyGeorge Mason UniversityArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations