Advertisement

Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 116–126 | Cite as

Walking the Path Together from High School to STEM Majors and Careers: Utilizing Community Engagement and a Focus on Teaching to Increase Opportunities for URM Students

  • Liza Finkel
Article

Abstract

Despite decades of efforts to increase the participation of women and people from underrepresented minority groups (URM) in science and math majors and careers, and despite the increasing diversification of the US population as a whole (Planty et al in National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 2008), participation in STEM majors and STEM careers (including STEM teaching) remains stubbornly male and white (Landivar in American Community Survey Reports, ACS-24, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC, 2013; National Science Foundation and National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics in Special Report NSF 15-311, Arlington, VA, 2015). This paper describes a project with two central goals: (1) to provide opportunities for URM high school students to engage in authentic science and math inquiry with the support of skilled college undergraduate mentors in the hope that these experiences will encourage these high school students to choose and persist in pursuing careers in STEM fields and, even if they do not choose those careers, to feel confident making complex, science or math-based decisions in their everyday lives and (2) to help the mentors (young people, mostly STEM majors) see teaching as a vital, intellectually challenging career that can provide them the opportunity to work for social justice in their communities. While it is unlikely that any one experience will help young people overcome the long odds that face them as they consider either path, our analysis suggests that projects of this kind can make a meaningful contribution to the effort.

Keywords

Science teacher preparation Teacher education URM participation in science teaching 

References

  1. Achinstein B, Ogawa R, Sexton D, Freitas C (2010) Retaining teachers of color: a pressing problem and a potential strategy for “hard-to-staff” schools. Rev Educ Res 80(1):71–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Institutes for Research (2009) The road to the STEM professoriate for underrepresented minorities: a review of the literature. American Institutes for Research, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton A (2003) Teaching science for social justice. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton AC, Basu J, Johnson V, Tan E (2011) Introduction. In: Basu SJ, Barton AC, Tan E (eds) Democratic science teaching: building the expertise to empower low-income minority youth in science. Sense Publishers, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. Brickhouse N, Lowery P, Schultz K (2000) What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. J Res Sci Teach 37(5):441–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brotman JS, Moore FM (2008) Girls and science: a review of four themes in the science education literature. J Res Sci Teach 45(9):971–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Building Engineering and Science Talent (BEST) (2004) A bridge for all: higher education design principles to broaden participation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. BEST, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  8. Christidou V (2011) Interest, attitudes and images related to science: combining students’ voices with the voices of school science, teachers, and popular science. Int J Environ Sci Educ 6(2):141–159Google Scholar
  9. Egan MK Jr, Hurtado S, Chang MJ, Garcia GA, Herrera FA, Garibay JC (2013) Making a difference in science education: the impact of undergraduate research Programs. Am Educ Res J 50(4):683–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisenhart M, Finkel L (1998) Women’s science: learning and succeeding from the margins. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Finkel L, Greene K, Rios J (2007) Accommodating student diversity within inquiry. In: Abrams Eleanor, Southerland Sherry, Silva Peggy (eds) Inquiry in the classroom: challenges and opportunities. Information Age Publishing, GreenwichGoogle Scholar
  12. Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder & Herder, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Gay Geneva (2010) Culturally responsive teaching: theory, research and practice, 2nd edn. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. George YS, Neale DS, Van Horne V, Malcom S (2001) In pursuit of a diverse science, technology, engineering, and mathematics workforce: recommended research priorities to enhance participation by underrepresented minorities. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Griffith A (2010) Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: is it the school that matters? Econ Educ Rev 29(6):911–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hurtado S, Cabrera N, Lin MH, Arellano L, Espinosa LL (2009) Diversifying science: underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Res High Educ 50(2):189–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hurtado S, Newman CB, Tran MC, Chang MJ (2010) Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: insights from a national project. New Dir Inst Res 2010(148):5–15.Google Scholar
  18. Ingersoll RM, May H (2011a) Recruitment, retention and the minority teacher shortage. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. CPRE Research Report #RR-69Google Scholar
  19. Ingersoll RM, May H (2011b) The minority teacher shortage: fact or fable. Phi Delta Kappan 93(1):62–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ingersoll R, Merrill L, May H (2012) Retaining teachers: how preparation matters. Educational Leadership. 69:30–34Google Scholar
  21. Jordan TC, Burnett SH, Carson S, Caruso SM, Clase K, DeJong RJ, Dennehy JJ, Denver DR, Dunbar D, Elgin SCR, Findley AM, Gissendanner CR, Golebiewska UP, Guild N, Hartzog GA, Grillo WH, Hollowell GP, Hughes LE, Johnson A, King RA, Lewis LO, Li W, Rosenzweig F, Rubin MR, Saha MS, Sandoz J, Shaffer CD, Taylor B, Temple L, Vazquez E, Ware VC, Barker LP, Bradley KW, Jacobs-Sera D, Pope WH, Russell DA, Cresawn SG, Lopatto D, Bailey CP, Hatfull GF (2014) A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students. MBio 5(1):e01051–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ladson-Billings G (2009) The dreamkeepers: successful teachers of African American children, 2nd edn. Jossey Bass Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  23. Landivar LC (2013) Disparities in STEM employment by sex, race, and Hispanic origin. American Community Survey Reports, ACS-24, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee O, Buxton CA (2010) Diversity and equity in science education: research, policy, and practice. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. National Academy of Sciences (2007) Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academies Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  26. National Science Foundation (2005) Broadening participation through a comprehensive, integrated system. National Science Foundation, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  27. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2015) Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2015. Special Report NSF 15-311. Arlington, VA. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
  28. Planty M, Hussar W, Snyder T, Provasnik S, Kena G, Dinkes R, KewalRamani A, Kemp J (2008) The condition of education 2008 (NCES 2008-031). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Sadler TD, McKinney L (2010) Scientific research for undergraduate students: a review of the literature. J Coll Sci Teach 39(5):43–49Google Scholar
  30. Tate W (2001) Science education as a civil right: urban schools and opportunity-to-learn considerations. J Res Sci Teach 38(9):1015–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tobias Sheila (1994) They’re not dumb, they’re different: stalking the second tier. The Research Corporation for Science Advancement, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  32. Villegas AM, Strom K, Lucas T (2012) Closing the racial/ethnic gap between students of color and their teachers: an elusive goal. Equity Excell Educ 45(2):283–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiggins G, McTighe G (2005) Understanding by design, expanded, 2nd edn. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Education and CounselingLewis & Clark CollegePortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations