Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Influence of Education Major: How Diverse Preservice Teachers View Pseudoscience Topics

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pseudoscience beliefs (e.g., astrology, ghosts or UFOs) are rife in American society. Most research examines creation/evolution among liberal arts majors, general public adults, or, infrequently, middle or high school science teachers. Thus, research truncates the range of ersatz science thinking and the samples it studies. We examined diverse beliefs, e.g., extraterrestrials, magic, Biblical creation, and evolution, among 540 female and 123 male future teachers, including 325 elementary education majors. We study how these cognitions related to education major and, because popular media often present pseudoscience “information”, student media use. Future elementary educators most often rejected evolution and endorsed “creationism” or Intelligent Design. Education majors held similar beliefs about astrology, UFO landings, or magic. Compared with other education students, elementary education majors watched less news or science television and read fewer popular science magazines. However, religious and media variables explained more variation in creation/evolution beliefs than education major. We discuss implications of our findings for elementary school science education and how teacher educators may be able to affect pseudoscience beliefs among their elementary education students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We refer here to social or political, not scientific, controversy, important especially when we consider the proliferation of supposedly “controversial topics” in current American politics about school science.

  2. Jenny McCarthy, an entertainer, has extensively written and spoken about the “dangers”, particularly autism, supposedly linked to vaccines (an assertion lacking systematic evidence). One pundit created the “Jenny McCarthy Body Count” website using data from the Centers for Disease Control, showing time series data on the incidence of different diseases in the USA. Between June 2007 and February 2011, he estimated at least 74,000 illnesses and over 600 deaths that could have been prevented by vaccination, see: http://www.jennymccarthybodycount.com accessed February 6, 2011.

  3. The National Science Teachers Association provided the population list for the national sample.

  4. A second science elementary education methods course or addressing the nature of science in a second [non-science] education course may help (Akerson et al. 2008; Gustafson and Rowell 1995).

  5. Among our participants for this study, 19 percent agreed, humans and dinosaurs lived at the same time.

  6. The questionnaire is available upon request from the first author (slosh@fsu.edu), or from Raymond Eve (eve@uta.edu) or Kenneth Feder (feder@ccsu.edu).

  7. This report is available by email from the first author (slosh@fsu.edu).

  8. The omitted seven items either had ignorance rates of at least 20 percent among these students (King Tut’s curse; the lost continent of Atlantis; or the Shroud of Turin); resembled none of the other pseudoscience general topics (reincarnation; communication with the dead; or the Bermuda Triangle) or were so highly skewed that the item was basically a constant (time travel).

  9. For correlations among these indices, see Losh and Nzekwe (2011), Table 6.

  10. None of the participants identified as orthodox Jews or Muslims of any kind.

  11. We also reference bivariate correlation coefficients published earlier (Losh and Nzekwe 2011).

  12. In prior analyses, we combined agreement with uncertainty responses for indices. However it has been suggested that “uncertainty” could indicate “scientific skepticism”. We doubt this explanation because of the centuries’ duration of legends such as the Loch Ness Monster or “systems” such as astrology. However, creating “purified” agreement indices as we do here does not change the overall results or conclusions.

  13. Because education major did not influence beliefs about creatures, magic or extraterrestrials we do not present MCA graphs for these three indices.

  14. This is besides recommending at least one traditional science course, e.g., biology, chemistry or physics in order for education graduates to receive elementary education certification in their state.

  15. Ghosthunters is one example of what is often touted as "science" on American TV science channels.

References

  • Abell SK, Smith DC (1994) What is science? Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. Int J Sci Educ 16(4):475–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson VL, Buzzelli CA, Donnelly LA (2008) Early childhood teachers’ views of nature of science: the influence of intellectual levels, cultural values and explicit reflective teaching. J Res Sci Educ 45(6):748–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton-Smith I (2008) Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis. Public Underst Sci 17(1):35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleton K, Kindt I (1999) Why teach primary science? Influences on beginning teachers’ practices. Int J Sci Educ 21(2):155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bann CM, Schwerin MJ (2004) Public knowledge and attitudes scale construction: analysis of short forms. Prepared for NSF Science Resource Studies. RTI International (May). Contract No. GS-10F-0097L; RTI Project No. 8796

  • Bartholomaus D (2010) Jenny McCarthy Body Count www.jennymccarthybodycount.com. Accessed 6 Feb 2011

  • Berkman MB, Plutzer E (2010) Evolution, creationism, and the battle to control America’s classrooms. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman MB, Pacheco JS, Plutzer E (2008) Evolution and creationism in America’s classrooms: a national portrait. PLoS Biol 6(5):e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060124. Accessed 26 Feb 2010

  • Bloom JW (1989) Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of science: science, theories and evolution. Int J Sci Educ 11(4):401–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlston D (2010) Social cognition. In: Baumeister R, Finkel E (eds) Advanced social psychology: the state of the science, chapter 3. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 63–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JA, Smith TW (2009) General social surveys, 1972–2008. National Opinion Research Center and Storrs, Chicago, The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut (distributor), CT

  • Erikson RS, Tedin KL (2011) American public opinion: its origins, content and impact, 8th edn. Pearson Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eve RA, Dunn D (1990) Psychic powers, astrology and creationism in the classroom? Evidence of pseudoscientific beliefs among high school biology and life science teachers. Am Biol Teach 52(1):10–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder KL (1984) Irrationality and popular archaeology. Am Antiq 49(3):525–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feder KL (1985/6) The challenges of pseudoscience. J Coll Sci Teach 15(3):180–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1991) Social cognition, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner G (1987) Science on television: how it affects public conceptions. Issues Sci Technol 3(Spring):109–115

  • Gustafson BF, Rowell PM (1995) Elementary preservice teachers: constructing conceptions about learning science, teaching science and the nature of science. Int J Sci Educ 17(5):589–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones I, Lake VE, Dagli U (2003) Integrating mathematics and science in undergraduate early childhood teacher education programs. J Early Child Teach Educ 24(1):3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones I, Lake VE, Dagli U (2005) Integration of science and mathematics methods and preservice teachers’ understanding of constructivism. J Early Child Teach Educ 25(2):165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losh SC (2011) Age, generational, and educational effects on American adult public understanding of science. In: Bauer MW, Shukla R, Allum N (eds) The culture of science-how does the public relate to science across the globe?. Routledge, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Losh SC, Nzekwe B (2011, in press) Creatures in the classroom: preservice teacher beliefs about fantastic beasts, magic, extraterrestrials, evolution and creationism. Sci Edu

  • Losh SC, Tavani CM, Njoroge R, Wilke R, McAuley M (2003) What does education really do? Educational dimensions and pseudoscience support in the American general public, 1979–2001. Skeptical Inq 27(5):30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore R, Cotner S (2009) Educational malpractice: the impact of including Creationism in high school biology classes. Evol Educ Outreach 2:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan M, Shanahan J (1999) Television and its viewers: cultivation theory and research. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Science Education (2011) Antievolution legislation in Oklahoma. January 19. http://ncse.com/news/2011/01/antievolution-legislation-oklahoma-006438. Accessed 7 Feb 2011

  • National Science Board (2010) Science and engineering indicators 2010. National Science Foundation (NSB-10-01). Chapter 7. Public Attitudes and Understanding, Arlington

  • Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (Pew 2009b). Many Americans mix multiple faiths: eastern, New Age beliefs widespread. Pew Research Center, Washington. http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=490#1 Accessed 21 Apr 2010

  • Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (Pew 2009a) A survey conducted in collaboration with the American Association for the Advancement of Science. http://people-press.org/report/528/ Accessed 10 July 2009

  • Rosenberg M (1968) The logic of survey analysis. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal D (1993) A learning cycle approach to dealing with pseudoscience beliefs of prospective elementary teachers. J Sci Teacher Educ 4(2):33–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider B, Carnoy M, Kilpatrick J, Schmidt WH, Shavelson RJ (2007) Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs: A Think Tank White Paper. American Educational Research Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer E, Endreny PM (1993) Reporting on risk: how the mass media portray accidents, diseases, disasters, and other hazards. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamp K, Mueller A (2001) A longitudinal study of the influences of primary and secondary school, university and practicum on student teachers’ images of effective primary science practice. Int J Sci Educ 23(3):227–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos NP, Cross P, Dickson K, DuBreuil SC (1993) Close encounters: an examination of UFO experiences. J Abnorm Psychol 102(4):624–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stollznow K (2009) Paranormal wall street. ESkeptic, Wednesday September 30. http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/09-09-30/ Retrieved 6 Sept 2010

  • Willingham DT (2007) Critical thinking: why is it so hard to teach? Am Educ 31(2):8–19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part through an American Educational Research Association grant REC-0310268, National Science Foundation grant 0532943 and the National Science Foundation Division of Materials Research through DMR-0654118. Thanks also to Haim Eshach, Raymond Eve, Ken Feder, Ryan Wilke, Alice Robbin, Martin Bauer, Bob Bell, Jaqui Falkenheim, and Nick Allum for insightful suggestions. The responsibility for errors, of course, rests with us.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Carol Losh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Losh, S.C., Nzekwe, B. The Influence of Education Major: How Diverse Preservice Teachers View Pseudoscience Topics. J Sci Educ Technol 20, 579–591 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9297-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9297-0

Keywords

Navigation