Advertisement

Journal of Science Education and Technology

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 403–421 | Cite as

Understanding The Impact of an Apprenticeship-Based Scientific Research Program on High School Students’ Understanding of Scientific Inquiry

  • Mehmet Aydeniz
  • Kristen Baksa
  • Jane Skinner
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of an apprenticeship program on high school students’ understanding of the nature of scientific inquiry. Data related to seventeen students’ understanding of science and scientific inquiry were collected through open-ended questionnaires. Findings suggest that although engagement in authentic scientific research helped the participants to develop competency in experimentation methods it had limited impact on participants’ learning of the implicit aspects of scientific inquiry and NOS. Discussion focuses on the importance of making the implicit assumptions of science explicit to the students in such authentic scientific inquiry settings through structured curriculum.

Keywords

Authentic scientific inquiry High school Nature of science 

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick F, Lederman NG (2000) Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a critical review of the literature. Int J Sci Educ 22(7):665–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrams E, Southerland SA, Silva P (2007) Inquiry in the classroom: challenges and possibilities. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CTGoogle Scholar
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] (1993) Benchmarks for science literacy: a project 2061 report. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Aydeniz M (2007) Understanding the challenges of implementing assessment reform in science classrooms: a case study of science teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, TallahasseeGoogle Scholar
  5. Barab SA, Hay KE (2001) Constructivism in practice: a comparison and contrast of apprenticeship and constructionist learning environments. J Learn Sci 10(1):281–322Google Scholar
  6. Bell RL, Blair LM, Crawford BA, Lederman NG (2003) Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. J Res Sci Teach 40(5):487–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard MR, Southerland SA, Granger DE (2009) No silver bullet for inquiry: making sense of teacher change following an inquiry-based research experience for teachers. Sci Educ 93(2):322–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bleicher RE (1996) High school students learning science in university research laboratories. J Res Sci Teach 33(10):1115–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown SL, Melear CT (2006) Investigation of secondary science teachers’ beliefs and practices after authentic inquiry-based experiences. J Res Sci Teach 43:938–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res 18:32–42Google Scholar
  11. Charney J, Hmelo-Silver CE, Sofer W, Neigeborn L, Coletta S, Nemeroff M (2007) Cognitive apprenticeship in science through immersion in laboratory practices. Int J Sci Educ 29(2):195–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen S (2006) Development of an instrument to assess views on nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science. Sci Educ 90:803–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chinn CA, Hmelo CE (2002) Authentic inquiry: introduction to the special section. Sci Educ 86:171–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chinn CA, Malhotra BA (2002) Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Sci Educ 86:175–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunbar K (1995) How scientists really reason: scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In: Sternberg RJ, Davidson J (eds) Mechanisms of insight. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, pp 365–395Google Scholar
  16. Dunbar K (1997) How scientists think: online creativity and conceptual change in science. In: Ward TB, Smith SM, Vaid S (eds) Conceptual structures and processes: emergence, discovery and change. APA Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunbar K (2001) What scientific thinking reveals about the nature of cognition. In: Crowley K, Shunn C, Okada T (eds) Designing for science: implications from everyday classroom and professional settings. Lawrence Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  18. Edmond N (2005) Report on the relationship of the scientific method to scientifically valid research and education research. Available [Online] http://www.scientificmethod.com/normanbooklet.pdf
  19. Eick CJ (2000) Inquiry, nature of science, and evolution: the need for a more complex pedagogical content knowledge in science teaching. Electron J Sci Educ 4(3):1–9Google Scholar
  20. Gallagher JJ (1991) Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Sci Educ 75:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Germann PJ, Haskins S, Auls S (1996) Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: promoting scientific inquiry. J Res Sci Teach 33(5):475–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guba E, Lincoln Y (1989) Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, Beverly Hills, CAGoogle Scholar
  23. Harding P, Hare W (2000) Portraying science accurately in classrooms: emphasizing open-mindedness rather than relativism. J Res Sci Teach 37(3):225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hofstein A, Lunetta VN (2004) The laboratory in science education: foundation for the 21st century. Sci Educ 88:28–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hsu PL, Roth WM (2009) From a sense of stereotypically foreign to belonging in a science community: ways of experiential descriptions about high school students’ science internship. Res Sci Educ. Published online 26 Feb 2009: http://www.springerlink.com/content/u2865r04h8271456/
  26. Hsu PL, Roth WM, Mazumder A (2009) Natural pedagogical conversations in a high school students’ internship. J Res Sci Teach 46(5):481–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khishfe R, Abd-El-Khalick F (2002) The influence of explicit reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 39(7):551–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knorr-Cetina K (1999) Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Kulkarni D, Simon HA (1988) The processes of scientific discovery: the strategy of experimentation. Cogn Sci 12:139–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Latour B, Woolgar S (1986) Laboratory life: the construction of scientific fact, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  32. Lederman NG (2007) Nature of science: past, present, and future. In: Abell SK, Lederman NG (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 831–880Google Scholar
  33. Lederman NG, Abd-El-Khalick F (1998) Avoiding de-natured science: activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In: McComas W (ed) The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 83–126Google Scholar
  34. Lederman NG, Abd-El-Khalick F, Bell RL, Schwartz RS (2002) Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners conceptions of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 39(6):497–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee H-S, Songer NB (2003) Making authentic science accessible to students. Int J Sci Educ 25(8):923–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Longino H (1990) Science as social knowledge: values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  37. Loving C (1997) From the summit of truth to its slippery slopes: science education’s journey through positivist-postmodern territory. Am Educ Res J 34(3):421–452Google Scholar
  38. McComas WF (1996) Ten myths of science: reexamining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Sci Math 96:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merriam SB (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education (rev. ed.). Jossey-Bass Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  40. National Academies of Sciences [NAS] (2005) America’s lab report: investigations in high school science. Committee on high school science laboratories: role and vision. The National Academies, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academic Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  42. National Research Council (2000) Inquiry and the national science education standards. National Academic Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  43. Richmond G, Kurth LA (1999) Moving from outside to inside: high school students’ use of apprenticeships as vehicles for entering the culture and practice of science. J Res Sci Teach 36(6):677–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ritchie SM, Rigano DL (1996) Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. J Res Sci Teach 33(7):799–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rogoff B (1990) Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Roth W-M (1995) Authentic school science. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  47. Roth KJ, Garnier HE (2007) What science teaching looks like: an international perspective. Educ Leadersh 64(4):16–23Google Scholar
  48. Roth W-M, Roychoudhury A (1993) The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. J Res Sci Teach 30(2):127–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rudolph J (2005) Epistemology for the masses: the origins of ‘the scientific method’ in American schools. Hist Educ Q 45:341–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Russ R (2006). A framework for recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific reasoning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  51. Ryan AG, Aikenhead GS (1992) Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Sci Educ 76(6):559–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sadler TD, Birgen S (2009, January) Authentic science research experiences for students and teachers: a review of empirical literature. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Science Teacher Education, Hartford, CTGoogle Scholar
  53. Sadler T, Burgin S, McKinney L, Ponjuan L (2010) Learning science through research apprenticeships: a critical review of the literature. J Res Sci Teach 47(3):235–256Google Scholar
  54. Sandoval WA, Reiser BJ (2004) Explanation driven inquiry: integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Sci Educ 88(3):345–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schunn CD, Anderson JR (1999) The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning. Cogn Sci 23(3):337–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schwartz RS, Crawford BA (2003, January) Critical elements for teaching the nature of science in the context of authentic scientific inquiry: practical guidelines for teacher educators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
  57. Schwartz R, Lederman N (2006, April) Scientists’ epistemological views of science. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  58. Schwartz RS, Lederman NG, Crawford BA (2004) Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: an explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Sci Educ 88(4):610–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schwartz RS, Lederman NG, Khishfe R, Lederman J, Matthews L, Liu SY  (2002, January) Explicit/reflective instructional attention to nature of science and scientific inquiry: impact on student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Charlotte, NCGoogle Scholar
  60. Schwartz RS, Lederman N, Lederman N (2008, March) An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: the VOSI questionnaire. Paper presented at the international conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Baltimore, MD. March 30–April 2Google Scholar
  61. Stake JE, Mares KR (2001) Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. J Res Sci Teach 38(10):1065–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stake JE, Mares KR (2005) Evaluating the impact of science-enrichment programs on adolescents’ science motivation and confidence: the splashdown effect. J Res Sci Teach 42(4):359–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tang X, Levin DM, Coffey JE, Hammer D (2008) The scientific method and scientific inquiry: tension as in teaching and learning. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences, vol 2, pp 374–381Google Scholar
  64. Templin MA, Engemann JF, Doran RL (1999) A locally based science mentorship program for high achieving students: unearthing issues that influence affective outcomes. School Sci Math 99(4):205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wallace CS, Kang NH (2004) An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: an examination of competing belief sets. J Res Sci Teach 41:936–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Windschitl M, Thomson J, Braaten M (2008) Beyond the scientific method: model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Sci Educ 92(5):941–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zachos P (2000) Setting theoretical and empirical foundations for assessing scientific inquiry and discovery in educational programs. J Res Sci Teach 37:938–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Theory and Practice in Teacher Education, College of Education, Health and Human SciencesThe University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Farragut High SchoolKnox County SchoolsKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations