Skip to main content
Log in

The Height Fluctuations of an Off-Critical Dimer Model on the Square Grid

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dimer model on a planar bipartite graph can be viewed as a random surface measure. We study these fluctuations for a dimer model on the square grid with two different classes of weights and provide a condition for their equivalence. In the thermodynamic limit and scaling window, these height fluctuations are shown to be non-Gaussian.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauer, M., Bernard, D., Kytölä, K.: LERW as an example of off-critical SLEs. J. Stat. Phys. 132(4), 721–754 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Benjamini, I., Lyons, R., Peres, Y., Schramm, O.: Uniform spanning forests. Ann. Probab. 29(1), 1–65 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Brydges, D.C., Fröhlich, J., Sokal, A.D.: The random-walk representation of classical spin systems and correlation inequalities. II. The skeleton inequalities. Commun. Math. Phys. 91(1), 117–139 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Camia, F., Joosten, M., Meester, R.: Trivial, critical and near-critical scaling limits of two-dimensional percolation. J. Stat. Phys. 137(1), 57–69 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Funaki, T.: Stochastic interface models. In: Lectures on Probability Theory and Statistics. Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1869, pp. 103–274. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kasteleyn, P.W.: The statistics of dimers on a lattice: I. the number of dimer arrangements on a quadratic lattice. Physica 27, 1209–1225 (1961)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kenyon, R.: Local statistics of lattice dimers. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 33(5), 591–618 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kenyon, R.: Conformal invariance of domino tiling. Ann. Probab. 28(2), 759–795 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kenyon, R.: Long-range properties of spanning trees. J. Math. Phys. 41(3), 1338–1363 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kenyon, R.: Dominos and the Gaussian free field. Ann. Probab. 29(3), 1128–1137 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kenyon, R.: Lectures on dimers. In: Statistical Mechanics. IAS/Park City Math. Ser., vol. 16, pp. 191–230. Am. Math. Soc., Providence (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kenyon, R.W., Propp, J.G., Wilson, D.B.: Trees and matchings. Electron. J. Comb. 7, Research Paper 25, 34 pp. (2000) (electronic)

  13. Kenyon, R., Okounkov, A., Sheffield, S.: Dimers and amoebae. Ann. Math. (2) 163(3), 1019–1056 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lashkevich, M.: Scaling limit of the six-vertex model in the framework of free field representation. J. High Energy Phys. 10, Paper 3, 18 pp. (1997) (electronic)

  15. Lawler, G.F.: Conformally Invariant Processes in the Plane. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 114. Am. Math. Soc., Providence (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lukyanov, S.: Form factors of exponential fields in the sine-Gordon model. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 12(33), 2543–2550 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Makarov, N., Smirnov, S.: Off-critical Lattice Models and Massive SLEs (2009). doi:10.1142/9789814304634_0024

  18. Nolin, P., Werner, W.: Asymmetry of near-critical percolation interfaces. J. Am. Math. Soc. 22(3), 797–819 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Schramm, O.: Scaling limits of loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees. Isr. J. Math. 118, 221–288 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Schramm, O., Sheffield, S.: Contour lines of the two-dimensional discrete Gaussian free field. Acta Math. 202(1), 21–137 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheffield, S.: Random surfaces. Astérisque 304, vi+175 (2005)

  22. Sheffield, S.: Gaussian free fields for mathematicians. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 139(3–4), 521–541 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Wendelin, W.: Random Planar Curves and Schramm-Loewner Evolutions. Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1840. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson, D.B.: Generating random spanning trees more quickly than the cover time. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, Philadelphia, PA, 1996, pp. 296–303. ACM, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to particularly thank Richard Kenyon for the many fruitful discussions which have led to this paper. I would also like to thank David Brydges for discussions of statistical mechanical models, Scott Sheffield for some very useful suggestions, Cédric Boutillier, Benjamin Young and Adrien Kassel for very many useful comments on this paper. Supported/Partially supported by the grant KAW 2010.0063 from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunil Chhita.

Appendix

Appendix

In Appendix, we present the function from Lemma 4.5. For y 1=x 2x 1, y 2=x 3x 2 and y 3=x 4x 3, we have

(A.1)

We also have the following lemma which is based on a crude argument.

Lemma A.1

There exists γ 1,…,γ 4, so that

(A.2)

Proof

To show that \(\int_{\gamma_{1}} \dots\int_{\gamma_{4}}f_{\lambda _{1},\lambda _{2}}(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4}) dx_{4} \dots dx_{1}\neq0\) for some choice of intervals γ i , choose γ 1=(0,1/2n), γ 2=(1−1/2n,1), γ 3=(2,2+1/2n) and γ 4=(3,3−1/2n). We claim that \(f_{\lambda _{1},\lambda _{2}}(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})\) is positive over this interval and so the integral over γ 1,…,γ 4 is non-zero.

We can bound y 1 and y 3 in terms of y 2 where y 1,y 2 and y 3 are defined above. These are given by

(A.3)

and

(A.4)

We can separate (A.1) into positive terms and negative terms, i.e. we can write (A.1) as g +(y 1,y 2,y 3)−g (y 1,y 2,y 3) where g and g + are positive. A lower bound for the positive terms can be achieved by setting y 1 and y 3 to y 2. An upper bound of the absolute value of the negative terms can be achieved by setting y 1 and y 3 to y 2(2n−2)/(2n+2). In other words, we have

(A.5)

and

(A.6)

The difference between these two bounds is positive provided we take n=|λ|m for |λ|≥1 and n=m/|λ| for |λ|<1 where m>20 (these bounds are not tight).

Indeed, by setting (2n−2)/(2n+2)=1−x, we can take a series expansion with respect to x between the positive and negative terms, which is given by

(A.7)

where the derivative is with respect to x. The x 0 term is strictly positive and is bounded below by \(e^{- 12 y_{2} |\lambda|}\). This is due to comparing the following positive and negative terms of (A.1) and noting that the difference in each case is bounded below by \(e^{- 12 y_{2} |\lambda|}\). These differences are given explicitly by

(A.8)
(A.9)
(A.10)
(A.11)

For |λ|≥1, the coefficient of the x 1 term in the above series expansion is negative and its absolute value is bounded above by \(e^{-|\lambda| y_{2}}\) for y 2≥1. As x is smaller than 1/220γ, then \(f_{\lambda_{1}, \lambda_{2}}(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})\) is positive over γ 1,…,γ 4 for |λ|≥1. For 0<|λ|<1, the absolute value of the coefficient of x 1 is bounded above by some constant c>2 for y 2≥1. As 1/220γ is less than \(e^{-12 y_{2} \gamma}\), the order x 1 term is less than the order x 0 term. This means \(f_{\lambda_{1}, \lambda_{2}}(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})>0\) over γ 1,…,γ 4. □

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chhita, S. The Height Fluctuations of an Off-Critical Dimer Model on the Square Grid. J Stat Phys 148, 67–88 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-012-0529-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-012-0529-3

Keywords

Navigation