Post-Traumatic Stress and World Assumptions: The Effects of Religious Coping
Religiosity has been shown to moderate the negative effects of traumatic event experiences. The current study was deigned to examine the relationship between post-traumatic stress (PTS) following traumatic event exposure; world assumptions defined as basic cognitive schemas regarding the world; and self and religious coping conceptualized as drawing on religious beliefs and practices for understanding and dealing with life stressors. This study examined 777 Israeli undergraduate students who completed several questionnaires which sampled individual world assumptions and religious coping in addition to measuring PTS, as manifested by the PTSD check list. Results indicate that positive religious coping was significantly associated with more positive world assumptions, while negative religious coping was significantly associated with more negative world assumptions. Additionally, negative world assumptions were significantly associated with more avoidance symptoms, while reporting higher rates of traumatic event exposure was significantly associated with more hyper-arousal. These findings suggest that religious-related cognitive schemas directly affect world assumptions by creating protective shields that may prevent the negative effects of confronting an extreme negative experience.
KeywordsReligious coping World assumptions Post-traumatic stress Israeli students Undergraduate students PTSD check list
- Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Kastenmuller, A., Jonas, E., & Frey, D. (2006). Coping with terrorism: The impact of increased salience of terrorism on mood and self efficacy of intrinsically religious and nonreligious people. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 365–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Green, B. (1996). Trauma history questionnaire. In B. H. Stamm (Ed.), Measurement of stress, trauma and adaptation (pp. 366–369). Lutherville, MD: Sidran Press.Google Scholar
- Israel Central Bureau of Statistics (2010). Jews, by continent of rigin, sex and age. (Hebrew). www.CBS.gov.il.
- Israel Central Bureau of Statistics (2012). Hseker Hehevrati 2009–2010. (Hebrew). www.CBS.gov.il.
- Israel Democracy Institute, The Guttman Center for Surveys (2008). (Hebrew) http://www.idi.org.il.
- King, L. A., King, D. W., Fairbank, J. A., Keane, T. M., & Adams, G. A. (1998). Resilience-recovery factors in post-traumatic stress disorder among female and male Vietnam veterans: Hardiness, postwar social support, and additional stressful life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 420–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Korn, L., & Zukerman, G. (2011). Affective and behavioral changes following exposure to traumatic events: The moderating effect of religiosity on avoidance behavior among students studying under a high level of terror event exposure. Journal of Religion and Health, 50(4), 911–921.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kubany, E. S. (2004). Traumatic life events questionnaire (TLEQ). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
- Levav, I., Kohn, R., & Billig, M. (2008). The protective effect of religiosity under terrorism. Psychiatry, 71, 47–59.Google Scholar
- Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Pargament, K. I. (2009). Wrestling with the angels: religious struggles in the context of mental illness. In Paper presented at the American Psychiatric Association Institute for Psychiatric Services, New York City, New York. October.Google Scholar
- Park, C. L. (2005). Religion as a meaning-making framework in coping posttraumatic symptoms after exposure to terror. Journal of Religion and Health, 50, 687–699.Google Scholar
- Resick, P. A., Monson, C. M., & Chard, K. M. (2008). Cognitive processing therapy: Veteran/military version. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans’ Affairs.Google Scholar
- Tsang, J., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Measuring religious constructs: A hierarchical approach to construct organization and scale selection. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychological assessment (pp. 345–360). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Herman, D. S., Huska, J. A., & Keane, T. M. (1993). The PTSD Checklist (PCL): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of international society for traumatic stress studies, San Antonio, TX, October, 1993.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J. P. (1995). Traumatic events and PTSD prevention. In B. Raphael & E. D. Barrows (Eds.), The handbook of preventative psychiatry (pp. 281–296). Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.Google Scholar