Skip to main content
Log in

Sad and Lonely? Sad Mood Suppresses Facial Mimicry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to investigate the influence of happy and sad mood on facial muscular reactions to emotional facial expressions. Following film clips intended to induce happy and sad mood states, participants observed faces with happy, sad, angry, and neutral expressions while their facial muscular reactions were recorded electromyografically. Results revealed that after watching the happy clip participants showed congruent facial reactions to all emotional expressions, whereas watching the sad clip led to a general reduction of facial muscular reactions. Results are discussed with respect to the information processing style underlying the lack of mimicry in a sad mood state and also with respect to the consequences for social interactions and for embodiment theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Activity of the M. Frontalis medialis equates to Action Unit 1 in the Facial Action Coding System (Ekman and Friesen 1978) and according to EMFACS (Friesen and Ekman 1984) Action Unit 1 is part of the expression of sadness. However, this is only rarely reported as a result in EMG studies.

  2. Because of this discrepancy with the pilot study, we suspected that the lack of a mood effect was due to the mood dissipating over the course of the experiment. To verify this assumption, we conducted another study with the same procedures as our main study, but varying when mood was measured: immediately after its induction or in the end of the experiment. The results of this study confirmed our assumption. Whereas we found significant differences immediately after the clips, there were no longer significant differences after the presentation of the facial expressions, independent of whether mood was measured only after the presentation of the facial expressions or after the film clips and after the facial expressions. Details of this pilot study are available upon request.

References

  • Alloy, L. B., Fedderly, S. S., Kennedy-Moore, E., & Cohan, C. L. (1998). Dysphoria and social interaction: An integration of behavioral confirmation and interpersonal perspectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1566–1579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, J., Barclay, A. M., & Stevenson, L. A. (1988). The recognition of threatening facial stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 647–665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, J., Woike, B. A., & Hyman, L. M. (1992). Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1050–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailenson, J. N., & Yee, N. (2005). Digital chameleons: Automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychological Science, 16, 814–819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. (1986). “I show how you feel”: Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 322–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, P., & Hess, U. (2008). The impact of social context on mimicry. Biological Psychology, 77, 343–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chartrand, T. L., Maddux, W. W., & Lakin, J. L. (2005). Beyond the perception–behavior link: the ubiquitous utility and motivational moderators of nonconscious mimicry. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 334–361). New York: Oxford University Press Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. C. (1976). Depression and the response of others. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), Heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167–196). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U. (1982). Facial reactions to facial expressions. Psychophysiology, 19, 643–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U. (1988). Facial electromyography and the experience of emotion. Journal of Psychophysiology, 2, 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U., & Lundqvist, L.-O. (1990). Gender differences in facial reactions to facial expressions. Biological Psychology, 30, 151–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U., & Petterson, M. (2000). Facial reactions to happy and angry facial expressions: Evidence for right hemisphere dominance. Psychophysiology, 37, 693–696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, 11, 86–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Grunedal, S. (2002). Facial reactions to emotional stimuli: Automatically controlled emotional responses. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 449–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Pictures of facial affect. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978). The Facial Action Coding System. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridlund, A. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Guidelines for human electromyographic research. Psychophysiology, 23, 567–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, W. V., & Ekman, P. (1984). EMFACS-7 Unpublished manuscript. Human Interaction Laboratory. San Francisco: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. D., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Affect and self-focused attention revisited: The role of affect orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gump, B. B., & Kulik, J. A. (1997). Stress, affiliation, and emotional contagion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 305–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, P., Bourgeois, P., & Hess, U. (1998). Counter mimicry effects as a function of racial attitudes. Poster presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research. Colorado: Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, U. (2001). The communication of emotion. In A. Kaszniak (Ed.), Emotions, qualia and consciousness (pp. 397–409). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewig, J., Hagemann, D., Seifert, J., Gollwitzer, M., Naumann, E., & Bartussek, D. (2005). A revised film set for the induction of basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1095–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C.-W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Investigations with a German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhuber, E., & Kappas, A. (2005). Moving smiles: The role of dynamic components for the perception of the genuineness of smiles. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzetta, J. T., & Englis, B. G. (1989). Expectations of cooperation and competition and their effects on observers’ vicarious emotional responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 543–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. T., Norris, C. J., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2003). Effects of positive and negative affect on electromyographic activity over zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii. Psychophysiology, 40, 776–785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Likowski, K. U., Mühlberger, A., Seibt, B., Pauli, P., & Weyers, P. (2008). Modulation of facial mimicry by attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1065–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, L.-O. (1995). Facial EMG reactions to facial expressions: A case of facial emotional contagion? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 36, 130–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces––KDEF, CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet, ISBN 91-630-7164-9.

  • McHugo, G. J., Lanzetta, J. T., & Bush, L. K. (1991). The effect of attitudes on emotional reactions to expressive displays of political leaders. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondillon, L., Niedenthal, P. M., Gil, S., & Droit-Volet, S. (2007). Imitation of in-group versus out-group members’ facial expressions of anger: A test with a time perception task. Social Neuroscience, 2, 223–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, E. J., McIntosh, D. N., Mann, L. J., & Weisser, K. R. (2007). More than mere mimicry? The influence of emotion on rapid facial reactions to faces. Emotion, 7, 447–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316, 1002–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niedenthal, P. M., Brauer, M., Halberstadt, J. B., & Innes-Ker, A. H. (2001). When did her smile drop? Contrast effects in the influence of emotional state on the detection of change in emotional expression. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 853–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedenthal, P. M., Halberstadt, J. B., Margolin, J., & Innes-Ker, A. H. (2000). Emotional state and the detection of change in facial expression of emotion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, C. (2000). Der Saarbrücker Persönlichkeitsfragebogen SPF (IRI). [The Saarbrücker Personality Inventory SPF (IRI)]. [Web document]. Retrieved from http://www.uni-saarland.de/fak5/ezw/abteil/motiv/paper/SPF(IRI).pdf.

  • Paulus, C. (2009). Der Saarbrücker Persönlichkeitsfragebogen SPF (IRI) zur Messung von Empathie: Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Version des Interpersonal Reactivity Index. [The Saarbrueck Personality Questionnaire on Empathy: Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index]. [Web document]. Retrieved from http://psydok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2009/2363/.

  • Salovey, P. (1992). Mood-induced self-focused attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 699–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schrammel, F., Pannasch, S., Graupner, S. T., Mojzisch, A., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (2009). Virtual friend or threat? The effects of facial expression and gaze interaction on psychophysiological responses and emotional experience. Psychophysiology, 46, 922–931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433–465). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C. (1992). Mood as a determinant of attentional focus. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Phillips, A. G., Baumgaertner, M. K., & Maschauer, E. L. (2006). Emotion concepts and self-focused attention: Exploring parallel effects of emotional states and emotional knowledge. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 229–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, D. M., Bradley, M. M., Dimoulas, E., & Lang, P. J. (2002). Looking at facial expressions: Dysphoria and facial EMG. Biological Psychology, 60, 79–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnby-Borgström, M., Jönsson, P., & Svensson, O. (2003). Emotional empathy as related to mimicry reactions at different levels of information processing. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Smith, J., Wild, H., Innes-Ker, A. H., Townsend, J., Duffy, C., Edwards, C., et al. (2001). Making faces: Creating three-dimensional parameterized models of facial expression. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 33, 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 973–988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Baaren, R. B., Fockenberg, D. A., Holland, R. W., Janssen, L., & van Knippenberg, A. (2006). The moody chameleon: The effect of mood on non-conscious mimicry. Social Cognition, 24, 426–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Velde, S. W., Stapel, D. A., & Gordijn, E. H. (2010). Imitation of emotion: When meaning leads to aversion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 536–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, B. E., Levenson, L., Warrenburg, S., & Price, L. H. (1994). Decreased perceptual sensitivity to emotion-provoking stimuli in depression. Psychiatry Research, 51, 127–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weyers, P., Likowski, K. U., Seibt, B., Wernecke, S., Pauli, P., Mühlberger, A., & Hess, U. (2010). Facial reactions to emotional facial expressions after subliminal priming for competition and cooperation. (submitted).

  • Weyers, P., Mühlberger, A., Kund, A., Hess, U., & Pauli, P. (2009). Modulation of facial reactions to avatar emotional faces by nonconscious competition priming. Psychophysiology, 46, 328–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. V., Saltzberg, J. A., & Goldsamt, L. A. (1990). Does affect induce self-focused attention? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 899–908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG WE2930/2-1) and a Postdoc-grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG) to the third author (SE 1121/3-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Weyers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Likowski, K.U., Weyers, P., Seibt, B. et al. Sad and Lonely? Sad Mood Suppresses Facial Mimicry. J Nonverbal Behav 35, 101–117 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-011-0107-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-011-0107-4

Keywords

Navigation