Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 595–614 | Cite as

Chaotic, fluid and unstable: an exploration of the complex housing trajectories of homeless people in Flanders, Belgium



This article analyses the housing and homeless pathways of (ex)homeless persons in the coastal city of Ostend. After a short review of the literature on the causes and meaning of the vulnerability of homeless persons, we describe how our case study with (former) homeless persons in Ostend was organised. We deal with some methodological issues and the analytic results, revealing a very complex housing trajectory. We focus on these dynamic and complex housing pathways and look at the role of relationships and relationship breakdown, work and unemployment, eviction after rent arrears and moving as an escape strategy. We also deal with the searching process for housing and the role of social networks. We end with some conclusions and interest points for policy.


Housing Homelessness Housing pathways Flanders 



We would like to thank Anne Beeckman, Ruth Owen (FEANTSA), the participants to the WELPHASE workshop at the Lillehammer ENHR conference (June 2012), our respondents and two anonymous referees for their comments on earlier versions of the text. We also would like to thank the colleagues and the members of the steering group of the Steunpunt Ruimte & Wonen, and the staff of CAW&JZ Middenkust for their support and co-operation.


  1. Anderson, I., & Tulloch, D. (2000). Pathways through homelessness: A review of the research evidence. Edingburgh: Scottish homes.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard, H.R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  3. Clapham, D. (2003). Pathways approaches to homelessness. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13, 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clapham, D. (2004). Housing pathways—a social constructionist framework. In K. Jacobs, J. Kemeny, & T. Manzi (Eds.), Social construction in housing research (pp. 93–116). Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Clapham, D. (2005). The meaning of housing: A pathways approach. Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Decker, P. (2002). On the rise of social rental agencies in Belgium. Urban Studies, 39(2), 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Decker, P. (2005). Rook zonder vuur? Fragmenten van een genese van een slechte reputatie en haar gevolgen voor de sociale huursector (Smoke without fire? Fragments of the genesis of the bad reputation of sociale rental dwellings and their consequences). In J. Vranken, et al. (Eds.) Armoede en Sociale Uitsluiting. Jaarboek 2004 (Poverty and social exclusion. Yearbook 2004) (pp. 207–226). Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
  8. De Decker, P. (2009). Social rental agencies: Still a splendid idea? European Journal of Homelessness, 3(December), 217–232.Google Scholar
  9. De Decker, P. (2013). Welzijnsbeleid en woonbeleid: de scheiding voorbij? (Welfare and Housing policy: Beyond the divorce?). In B. Hubeau, et al. (Eds.) 15 jaar Vlaamse Wooncode (pp. 361–405). Brugge: Die Keure, Brugge.Google Scholar
  10. De Decker, P., Goossens, L., & Pannecoucke, I. (Eds.). (2005). Wonen aan de onderkant (Housing at the bottom). Garant: Antwerpen & Apeldoorn.Google Scholar
  11. De Decker, P., Kesteloot, C., & C. Newton. (2009). Where are vulnerable people to live in a State obsessed with homeownership? In J. Doherty, & B. Edgar (Eds.) In my caravan, I feel like superman. Essays in the memory of Henk Meert 19632006 (pp. 7–30). Brussels/Saint Andrews: Feantsa/Centre for Housing Research.Google Scholar
  12. De Decker, P., Meeus, B., & C. Newton. (2011). On the changing discourse on social housing in Flanders, Belgium and its consequences, paper presented at the ENHR Conference, Toulouse.Google Scholar
  13. De Decker, P., & Newton, C. (2011). What is worst for social housing: neo-liberalism? Self-humiliation? Or environmentalism? Paper presented at the 2011 Asia-Pacific Network for Housing Research Conference, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  14. De Decker, P., & Pannecoucke, I. (2004). The creation of the incapable tenant. A preliminary assessment of the discourse on social rented housing. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(4), 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Doherty, J., Edgar, B., & Meert, H. (2002). Homeless research in Europe. A summary. Brussels: FEANTSA.Google Scholar
  17. FEANTSA. (2012). Social rental agencies: An innovative housing-led response to homelessness. Good Practice Brieffing.
  18. Fitzpatirck, S., Bramley, G., & Johnsen, S. (2012). Pathways into multiple exclusion homelessness in seven UK Cities. Urban Studies. doi: 10.1177/0042098012452329.
  19. Fitzpatrick, S. (2000). Young homeless people. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heylen K., Le Roy, M., Vanden Broucke, S., Vandekerckhove, B., & Winters, S. (2007). Wonen in Vlaanderen. De resultaten van de Woonsurvey 2005 en de Uitwendige Woningschouwing 2005 (Housing in Flanders. The results of the 2005 survey). Brussel: Departement Ruimtelijke Ordening, Woonbeleid en Onroerend Erfgoed.Google Scholar
  21. Karsten, L. (2007). Housing as a way of life: Towards an understanding of middle class families’ preferences for an urban residential location. Housing Studies, 22(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lescrauwaet, D. (2005). Thuislozen krijgen geen voet aan de grond in de sociale huisvesting (Homeless cannot enter social housing). In P. De Decker, L. Goossens & I. Pannecoucke, (Eds.) Wonen aan de onderkant (pp. 437–446). Antwerpen & Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
  23. Mayock, P., & Sheridan, S. (2012a). Women’s ‘journeys’ to homelessness: Key findings from a biographical study of Homeless Women in Ireland, Research paper 1, Dublin: School of Social work and social policy and Children’s research centre, Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
  24. Mayock, P., & Sheridan, S. (2012b). Migrant women and homelessness: key findings from a biographical study of Homeless Women in Ireland, Research paper 2, Dublin: School of Social work and social policy and Children’s research centre, Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
  25. Meert, H., & Bourgeois, M. (2005). Between rural and urban slums: A Geography of pathways through homelessness. Housing Studies, 20(1), 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meeus, B., & De Decker, P. (2013a). De geest van suburbia [The spirit of suburbia]. Antwerpen: Garant.Google Scholar
  27. Meeus, B., & De Decker, P. (2013b). Tussen begeleider en huisbaas. Een exploratief onderzoek naar de uitstroom uit bijzondere jeugdzorg naar de woningmarkt in het arrondissement Antwerpen [Between landlord and social assistence. An explorative research on the outflow out of youth care in the housing of the province of Anwerp]. Brussels: Faculty of Architecture, Catholic University of Leuven (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  28. Netto, G. (2011). Identity negotiation, pathways to housing and “place”: The experience of refugees in Glasgow, in housing. Theory and Society, 28(2), 123–143.Google Scholar
  29. Pannecoucke, I., Van Dam, R., Geurts, V., De Decker, P., Goossens, L., & Cantillon, B. (2001). Profiel van de sociale huurder en subjectieve beleving van de realisaties van de sociale huursector (Profile of the social tenant and the subjective experience of social rental housing), report for the Vlaamse Gemeenschap. Antwerpen: OASeS/CSB-UFSIA.Google Scholar
  30. Philippot, P., & Galand, B. (2003). Les personnes sans-abri en Belgique: Regards croisés des habitants de la rue, de l’opinion publique et des travailleurs sociaux (Homeless persons in Belgium). Gent: Academia Press.Google Scholar
  31. Piliavin, I., Sosin, M., Westerfelt, A. H., & Matsueda, M. L. (1993). The duration of homeless careers. Social Science Review, 67(4), 576–598.Google Scholar
  32. Pleace, N., Fitzpatrick, S., Johnsen, S., Quilgars, D., & Sanderson, D. (2008). Statutory homelessness in England: The experience of families and 16–17 year olds. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  33. Robinson, D., Reeve, K., & Casey, R. (2007). The housing pathways of new immigrants. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  34. Severinsen, C. A. (2013). Housing pathways of camping ground residents in New Zealand. Housing Studies online 22/10/2012.Google Scholar
  35. Somerville, P. (2012). Understanding homelessness. In Housing, theory and society.
  36. Tomas, A., & Dittmar, H. (1995). The experience of homeless women: An exploration of housing histories and the meaning of home. Housing Studies, 10(4), 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Geyt, M. (2010). Tussen wonen en welzijn [In between housing and welfare]. Berchem: Steunpunt Algemeen Welzijnswerk.Google Scholar
  38. Van Menxel, G. (2005). De ultieme onderkant: de thuisloze in het vizier (The ultimate bottom: a look at the homeless). In P. De Decker, L. Goossens, & I. Pannecoucke, (Eds.) Wonen aan de onderkant [Being housed at the bottom] (pp. 157–194). Antwerpen & Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
  39. Van Menxel, G., Lescrauwaet, D., & Parys, I. (2003). Verbinding verbroken: Thuisloosheid en algemeen welzijnswerk in Vlaanderen [Connection disrupted]. Berchem: Steunpunt Algemeen Welzijnswerk.Google Scholar
  40. Van Regenmortel, T., Demeyer, B., Vandenbempt, K., & Van Damme, K. (2006). Zonder (t)huis: Sociale biografieën van thuislozen getoetst aan de institutionele en maatschappelijke realiteit [Without house/home: Social biographies of homeless in confrontation with the institutional and social reality]. Leuven: Lannoo Campus.Google Scholar
  41. Wong, Y.-L. I. (1997). Patterns of homelessness: A review of longitudinal studies. In D. P. Culhane & S. P. Hornburg (Eds.), Understanding homelessness: New policy and research perspectives (pp. 135–164). Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ArchitectureCatholic University of LeuvenCampus LUCABelgium
  2. 2.University College GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations