Skip to main content
Log in

Vascularized composite allotransplantation: a new concept in musculoskeletal regeneration

  • Special Issue: ESB 2015
  • Biocompatibility Studies
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, the fields of biomaterial sciences and tissue engineering have evolved into new clinically relevant applications including regenerative medicine and cell based therapies. Tissue engineering therapies are based on different types of materials and scaffolds combined with cells and submitted to engineering processes in order to create bio-scaffolds which will improve or replace biological functions. Despite the effort, only a few therapies, such as bone, cartilage and nerve, succeeded in clinical applications. Furthermore, the major drawback in standard application of these therapies was the critical size defects which could be covered with engineered materials, as well as inability to provide sustainable vascular supply to the created bio-scaffolds. In 1998, the first successful hand transplantation was performed in France, and the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) was introduced into the armamentarium of reconstructive surgery (Dubernard in Am J Transplant 5(6):1580–1, 2005; Petruzzo et al. in Am J Transplant 6(7):1718–24, 2006; Lanzetta et al. in Transplantation 79(9):1210–4, 2005). As a result, a new generation of transplants including hand, face, larynx abdominal wall, lower extremities and penile transplantation became available to patients who had lost these unique organs and were previously unable to achieve restored function using standard reconstructive procedures. Ethical debate on the need for life-long immunosuppressive therapy to prevent rejection of the VCA overshadowed the success of face and hand transplants. Thus, a new, challenging opportunity developed to combine approaches of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine and ultimately restore the framework, function, aesthetics and survival of the VSA transplants. This overview presents the unique opportunities of merging established and new technologies into the burgeoning field of reconstructive transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dubernard J. Composite tissue allografts: a challenge for transplantologists. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(6):1580–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Petruzzo P, Badet L, Gazarian A, et al. Bilateral hand transplantation: six years after the first case. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(7):1718–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lanzetta M, Petruzzo P, Margreiter R, et al. The international registry on hand and composite tissue transplantation. Transplantation. 2005;79(9):1210–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Siemionow M, Papay F, Alam D, et al. Near-total human face transplantation for a severely disfigured patient in the USA. Lancet. 2009;374:203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Siemionow M, Gozel-Ulusal B, Engin Ulusal A, et al. Functional tolerance following face transplantation in the rat. Transplantation. 2003;75:1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siemionow M, Unal S, Agaoglu G, et al. A cadaver study in preparation for facial allograft transplantation in humans: part I: what are alternative sources for total facial defect coverage? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(864):873.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Siemionow M, Klimczak A. Advances in the development of experimental composite tissue transplantation models. Transplant Int. 2010;23:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siemionow M, Agaoglu G, Unal S. A cadaver study in preparation for facial allograft transplantation in humans: part II: mock facial transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(876):886.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Siemionow M, Papay F, Djohan R, et al. First U.S. near-total human face transplantation-a paradigm shift for massive complex injuries. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Birchall M, Lorenz R, Berke G, et al. Laryngeal transplantation in 2005: a review. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(1):20–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mansbridge J. Skin tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2008;19(8):955–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stern-Straeter J, Riedel F, Bran G, et al. Advances in skeletal muscle tissue engineering. In Vivo. 2007;21(3):435–44.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts S, Howard D, Buttery L, Shakesheff K. Clinical applications of musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Br Med Bull. 2008;86:7–22. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldn016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Howard D, Buttery L, Shakesheff K, Roberts S. Tissue engineering: strategies, stem cells and scaffolds. J Anat. 2008;213(1):66–72. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00878.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Healy K, Guldberg R. Bone tissue engineering. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2007;7(4):328–30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gu X, Ding F, Williams D. Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials. 2014;35(24):6143–56. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shearn J, Kinneberg K, Dyment N, et al. Tendon tissue engineering: progress, challenges, and translation to the clinic. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2011;11(2):163–73.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nemeno-Guanzon G, Soojung Lee S, Berg J, et al. Trends in tissue engineering for blood vessels. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:1–14. doi:10.1155/2012/956345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Do A, Khorsand B, Geary S, Salem A. 3D printing of scaffolds for tissue regeneration applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;. doi:10.1002/adhm.201500168.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Conde M, Chisini L, Demarco F, Nör J, Casagrande L, Tarquinio S. Stem cell-based pulp tissue engineering: variables enrolled in translation from the bench to the bedside, a systematic review of literature. Int Endod J. 2015;. doi:10.1111/iej.12489.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Michel J, Penna M, Kochen J, Cheung H. Recent advances in hydroxyapatite scaffolds containing mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:305217. doi:10.1155/2015/305217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gonfiotti A, Jaus MO, Barale D, et al. The first tissue-engineered airway transplantation: 5-year follow-up results. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):238–44. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62033-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gugatschka M, Ohno S, Saxena A, Hirano S. Regenerative medicine of the larynx. Where are we today? A review. J Voice. 2012;26(5):670.e7-13. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.03.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Siemionow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siemionow, M. Vascularized composite allotransplantation: a new concept in musculoskeletal regeneration. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 26, 266 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5601-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5601-5

Keywords

Navigation