Skip to main content
Log in

Ball milling-induced reduction of MoS2 with Al

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ball milling-induced reduction of MoS2 by Al has been investigated. Although this is a highly exothermic reaction that, based on its thermodynamic properties, should progress as a self-sustaining process, ignition could not be achieved by ball milling. In order to identify the reason, XRD, particle size distribution, SEM, and DTA measurements were carried out on a series of samples milled for different durations. It was found that the largest composite agglomerates broke up due to the presence of a fine dispersion of MoS2 particles. SEM also revealed that the grains are packed rather loosely within the agglomerates. These results indicate that a self-sustaining process can take place only if large and well-compacted composite particles are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heinicke G (1984) Tribochemistry. Hanser Publishers, München

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avvakumov EG (1986) Mechanical Methods of the Activation of Chemical Processes. Nauka Publishing House, Novosibirsk

    Google Scholar 

  3. Suryanarayana C (2001) Prog Mater Sci 46:1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McCormick PG (1992) Metall Trans A 23A:1285

    Google Scholar 

  5. Takacs L (1993) NanoStruct Mater 2:241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Takacs L (1996) J Sol State Chem 125:75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sugamata M, Kaneko J, Higuchi H (1998) Mater Sci Forum 269–272:157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McCormick PG (1995) Mater Trans JIM 36:161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsuzuki T, McCormick PG (2004) J Mater Sci 39:5143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schaffer GB, McCormick PG (1989) Appl Phys Lett 55:45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Takacs L (1992) Mater Lett 13:119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Takacs L (2002) Prog Mater Sci 47:355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Torosyan AR, Martirossyan VG, Karakhanyan SS (1998) Int J Self-Propag High-Temp Synth 7:87

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rodrigues JA et al (1991) J Mater Sci Lett 10:819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kubaschewski O, Alcock CB, Spencer PJ (1993) Materials Thermochemistry, 6th ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. Klug HP, Alexander LA (1977) X-Ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials, 2nd Ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 665

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eckert J, Holzer JC, Krill CE, Johnson WL, (1992) J Mater Res 7:1751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fecht HJ, Hellstern E, Fu Z, Johnson WL (1990) Metall Trans A 21A:2333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chakurov Chr, Rusanov V, Koichev J (1987) J Sol State Chem 71:522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Takacs L, Soika V, Baláž P (2001) Sol State Ionics 141–142:641

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

One of the authors (A.R.T.) is expressing his thanks to the Council for International Exchange of Scholars for a Fulbright Scholarship that made this investigation possible. This work was supported in part by DRIF funds from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. The help of Dr. Robert C. Reno with the SEM investigations and the ball milling experiments carried out by Youssef A. Mahmoud are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Takacs.

Appendix

Appendix

The particle size distribution is characterized in Fig. 3 by plotting the volume fraction density (Q log) as a function of the decadic logarithm of the particle diameter (log x.) From this graph, the volume fraction of particles between diameters x 1 and x 2,

P(x 1 < xx 2), is obtained as the area under the curve between log x 1 and log x 2. If x 2x 1 << x 2,

$$ P(x_1 \, < \,x\, < \,x_2 )\, \approx \,Q_{\log } (\log \;x_2 - \log \;x_1 )\, = \,Q_{\log } \log (x_2 /x_1 ) $$
(A.1)

Although the proper variable of the horizontal axis is log x, it is usually labeled in terms of diameters. The logarithm is dimensionless, thus both P and Q log can be expressed in percentages.

The quantity most often used to characterize the particle size distribution is the cumulative distribution F(x), defined as the volume fraction occupied by particles smaller than x. If an atom of the sample is chosen at random, F(x) gives the probability that it belongs to a particle smaller than x. As F is an integral quantity, it may hide some fine details of the particle size distribution. Q log relates to F as follows:

The volume fraction of particles between diameters x 1 and x 2 is

$$ P(x_1 \, < \,x\, < \,x_2 )\, = \,F(x_2 ) - F(x_1 ). $$
(A.2)

If Δx = x 2x 1 << x 2,

$$ P(x_1 \, < \,x\, < \,x_2 )\, \approx \,Q(x_2 - x_1 ) = Q\Delta x{\hbox{,}} $$
(A.3)

where Q = dF/dx is the volume fraction density. The dimension of Q is 1/length. Q log differs from Q, because its variable is log(x) rather than x. But Eq. (A.1) and (A.3) provide the same quantity, consequently

$$ Q\Delta x\,= \,Q_{\log} \log (1\, + \,\Delta x/x_1 )\, \approx \,Q_{\log} [\log (e)/x]\,\Delta x{\hbox{.}} $$
(A.4)

From here,

$$ Q_{\log} \, = \, Q x /{\log} (e)\, \approx \, 2.3 x \, Q \,{\hbox{ = }} \, {\hbox{2.3}}\, x \,{\hbox{d}} F / {\hbox{d}}x.$$
(A.5)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takacs, L., Baláž, P. & Torosyan, A.R. Ball milling-induced reduction of MoS2 with Al. J Mater Sci 41, 7033–7039 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0950-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0950-6

Keywords

Navigation