Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Butterflies on the brink: habitat requirements for declining populations of the marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in SW England

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

1. The marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia is one of our most endangered butterflies, and the only to be protected under European legislation as well as British. It persists in fragile subpopulations threatened by habitat fragmentation and degradation. 2. A combination of swaling and cattle grazing are accepted to be best practice for managing wet, unimproved grasslands—the favoured habitat for E. aurinia in Cornwall. These two well-endorsed methods of management were used to increase and improve the quality of habitat for E. aurinia over a 5 years period, 2004–2008, at a stronghold network of habitat patches in mid Cornwall, south-west England. 3. Analyses of adult and larval densities over 5 years in fifty-four transects across nine sites found E. aurinia to favour habitat patches with higher densities of the larval food plant (Devil’s-bit scabious Succisa pratensis), higher sward height in autumn, and intermediate optimum levels of stock grazing. 4. Main findings indicated most sites experienced significant declines in numbers. Unfavourable weather in the last 2 years of monitoring was likely to have had a significant impact on the response of individual subpopulations to habitat management though poor recovery rates may also reflect a time-lag in colonisation events after habitat improvement has occurred. 5. Habitat management produced an improvement, albeit an inconsistent improvement in habitat variables across patches—S. pratensis shows a clear recovery at some sites. Autumn sward height increased significantly at one site, and a quadratic relationship between stock grazing and important habitat variables has been found which will aid further improvement over all sites for the long term persistence of E. aurinia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G, Kaule G (2003) Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure: the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies. J Insect Conserv 7:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher J, Warren M, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Jeffcoate S (2001) The millenium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett LK, Warren MS (1995) Species action plan: marsh fritillary. Eurodryas aurinia. Butterfly Conservation

  • Betzholtz PE, Ehrig A, Lindeborg M, Dinnetz P (2007) Food plant density, patch isolation and vegetation height determine occurrence in a Swedish metapopulation of the marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg, 1775) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). J Insect Conserv 11:343–350. doi:10.1007/s10841-006-9048-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botham MS, Brereton TM, Middlebrook I, Cruickshanks KL, Harrower C, Beckmann B, Roy DB (2008) United Kingdom butterfly monitoring scheme report for 2008. CEH Wallingford

  • Brereton TM, Brook S, Hobson R (2005) Habitat condition monitoring for butterflies: 2004 pilot study. Butterfly conservation report No. S05-06, Wareham

  • Buhler C, Schmid B (2001) The influence of management regime and altitude on the population structure of Succisa pratensis: implications for vegetation monitoring. J Appl Ecol 38:689–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulman CR (2001) Conservation biology of the marsh fritillary butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds

  • Bulman CR, Wilson RJ, Holt AR, Bravo LG, Early RI, Warren MS, Thomas CD (2007) Minimum viable metapopulation size, extinction debt, and the conservation of a declining species. Ecol Appl 17:1460–1473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolek M, Geyer A (1997) Influence of management on butterflies of rare grassland ecosystems in Germany. J Insect Conserv 1:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Early R, Anderson B, Thomas CD (2008) Using habitat distribution models to evaluate large-scale landscape priorities for spatially dynamic species. J Appl Ecol 45:228–238. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01424.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford HD, Ford EB (1930) Fluctuation in numbers, and its influence on variation, in Melitaea aurinia, Rott (Lepidoptera). Trans R Entomol Soc Lond 78:345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1994) A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol 63:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (2004) Ecology genetics and evolution of metapopulations. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Thomas CD (1994) Metapopulation dynamics and conservation—a spatially explicit model applied to butterflies. Biol Conserv 68:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Kuussaari M, Nieminen M (1994) Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea-cinxia. Ecology 75:747–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Pakkala T, Kuussaari M, Lei GC (1995) Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson R, Budd P (2001) The marsh fritillary in cornwall: site dossier. Incorporating the bodmin moor larval survey 2000. Report No. S01-32, Butterfly Conservation, Wareham

  • Hobson R, Bourn NAD, Warren MS, Brereton TM (2001) The marsh fritillary in England: a review of status and habitat condition. Report no. S01-31, Butterfly Conservation, Wareham

  • Hula V, Konvicka M, Pavlicko A, Fric Z (2004) Marsh fritillary (Euphydiyas aurinia) in the Czech Republic: monitoring, metapopulation structure, and conservation of an endangered butterfly. Entomol Fenn 15:231–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce DA, Pullin AS (2003) Conservation implications of the distribution of genetic diversity at different scales: a case study using the marsh fritillary butterfly (Euphydryas aurinia). Biol Conserv 114:453–461. doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00087-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker M, Schmitt T (2010) Demography, dispersal and movement pattern of Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) at the Iberian Peninsula: an alarming example in an increasingly fragmented landscape? J Insect Conserv 14:237–246. doi:10.1007/s10841-009-9250-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konvicka M, Hula V, Fric Z (2003) Habitat of pre-hibernating larvae of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae): what can be learned from vegetation composition and architecture? Eur J Entomol 100:313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuussaari M, Saccheri I, Camara M, Hanski I (1998) Allee effect and population dynamics in the glanville fritillary butterfly. Oikos 82:384–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull Entomol Soc Am 15:237–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis OT, Hurford C (1997) Assessing the status of the marsh fritillary butterfly (Eurodryas aurinia): an example from Glamorgan, UK. J Insect Conserv 1:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu WH, Wang YF, Xu RM (2006) Habitat utilization by ovipositing females and larvae of the marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in a mosaic of meadows and croplands. J Insect Conserv 10:351–360. doi:10.1007/s10841-006-9009-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peet NB, Watkinson AR, Bell DJ, Sharma UR (1999) The conservation management of imperata cylindrica grassland in Nepal with fire and cutting: an experimental approach. J Appl Ecol 36:374–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter K (1981) The population dynamics of small colonies of the butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. Ph.D. Thesis, Oxford University

  • Porter K (1982) Basking behaviour in larvae of the butterfly Euphydryas-aurinia. Oikos 38:308–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter K (1983) Multivoltinism in Apanteles-bignellii and the influence of weather on synchronization with its host Euphydryas-aurinia. Entomol Exp Appl 34:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöyry J, Lindgren S, Salminen J, Kuussaari M (2005) Responses of butterfly and moth species to restored cattle grazing in semi-natural grasslands. Biol Conserv 122:465–478. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 21 May 2010

  • Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392:491–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schtickzelle N, Choutt J, Goffart P, Fichefet V, Baguette M (2005) Metapopulation dynamics and conservation of the marsh fritillary butterfly: population viability analysis and management options for a critically endangered species in Western Europe. Biol Conserv 126:569–581. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigaard P, Pertoldi C, Madsen AB, Sogaard B, Loeschcke V (2008) Patterns of genetic variation in isolated danish populations of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. Biol J Linn Soc 95:677–687. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01078.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart KEJ, Bourn NAD, Thomas JA (2001) An evaluation of three quick methods commonly used to assess sward height in ecology. J Appl Ecol 38:1148–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD (1994) Extinction, colonization, and metapopulations—environmental tracking by rare species. Conserv Biol 8:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Wilson RJ, Lewis OT (2002) Short-term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulation. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:563–569. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunmore M, Robinson F, Hodgson D (2008) Marsh fritillary monitoring on nine sites in mid-cornwall: flight and larval web surveys. A report to mid-cornwall moors LIFE project. Cornwall Environmental Consultants Ltd, Truro

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Swaay CAM, Warren MS (1999) Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera), 99th edn. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg N, Moilanen A, Hanski I (1996) Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science 273:1536–1538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg N, Klemetti T, Hanski I (2002) Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. Ecography 25:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS (1994) The UK status and suspected metapopulation structure of a threatened European butterfly, the marsh fritillary Eurodryas-aurinia. Biol Conserv 67:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks go to a multitude of helpers in the field; R. Hobson, M. Davey, M. Easter, H. Silver, P. Brown and C. Berry. Also to Natural England, Cornwall Wildlife Trust and all landowners allowing access to land. The habitat management and monitoring schemes were part funded by the EU LIFE Nature Programme. M.S., R.f–C. and D.J.H are funded by BBSRC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dave Hodgson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smee, M., Smyth, W., Tunmore, M. et al. Butterflies on the brink: habitat requirements for declining populations of the marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in SW England. J Insect Conserv 15, 153–163 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9334-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9334-y

Keywords

Navigation