Abstract
The Cape Peninsula is an area of outstanding biological importance, not only for to its high levels of floristic diversity and endemism, but also for its number of localised endemic invertebrates. Little is known of the spatial distribution of invertebrates across the Peninsula, or how best to conserve them. Sampling by visual searches assisted by aerial and aquatic hand-nets was undertaken throughout the Peninsula. The most important areas for insect diversity on the Peninsula, and associated environmental variables, were determined. The ‘Peninsula effect’ was also investigated. Nine Red Listed species and five new species for the Peninsula were recorded. This high number of Red Listed species (for those few groups that have been assessed) emphasises the biological importance of the Cape Peninsula. Table Mountain had the most Red Listed species, while Cape Point had many species not found in the other areas. Noordhoek Wetland is very important for aquatic Coleoptera. Small hills on the Peninsula are important for overall insect diversity. Elevation, slope, aspect, distance to water and vegetation structure were the most important environmental variables in determining the insect assemblages. The Peninsula effect appears to have no influence on these particular insect assemblages of the Cape Peninsula. The high number of new Peninsula records for well-known taxonomic groups indicates that still little is known of the insect assemblages across the Peninsula. Nevertheless, areas of conservation priority identified in this study are Table Mountain (for Red Listed species), Noordhoek (for aquatic Coleoptera) and Cape Point and the small hills across the Peninsula (for their unique invertebrate assemblages). Conservation of a variety of elevations, including steep and flat areas, all aspects of mountains, as well as both the wet and dry areas, overall will contribute to the conservation of the insects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axmacher JC, Holtmann G, Scheuermann L, Brehm G, Muller-Hohenstein K, Fiedler K (2004) Diversity of geometrid moths (Lepidoptera : Geometridae) along an Afrotropical elevational rainforest transect. Divers Distrib 10:293–302. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00101.x
Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Denslow JS, Guariguata MR (1998) Species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rainforests of northeastern Costa Rica. In: Dallmeier F, Comiskey JA (eds) Forest biodiversity research, monitoring and modeling: conceptual background and old world case studies. Pathenon, Paris
Claassens AJM (2000) Butterflies of the Cape Peninsula. Tafelberg Publishers, Cape Town
Colwell RK (2006) EstimateS 8.0.0. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/EstimateS. Date Cited 30th Jan 2009
Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos Trans R Soc B 345:101–118. doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0091
Cook RE (1969) Variation in species density in North American birds. Syst Zool 18:63–84. doi:10.2307/2412411
Cowling RM, Homes PM, Rebelo AG (1992) Plant diversity and endemism. In: Cowling RM (ed) The ecology of fynbos. Nutrients, fire and diversity. Oxford University Press, Cape Town
Cowling RM, Macdonald IAW, Simmons MT (1996) The Cape Peninsula, South Africa: physiographical, biological and historical background to an extraordinary hot-spot of biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 5:527–550. doi:10.1007/BF00137608
Davis ALV (2002) Dung beetle diversity in South Africa: influential factors, conservation status, data inadequacies and survey design. Afr Entomol 10:53–65
Gentry AH (1986) Endemism in tropical plant versus temperate plant communities. In: Soulé M (ed) Conservation biology. The science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Press, Sunderland
Goldblatt P (1997) Floristic diversity in the Cape Flora of South Africa. Biodivers Conserv 6:359–377. doi:10.1023/A:1018360607299
Grant PBC, Samways MJ (2007) Montane refugia for endemic and Red Listed dragonflies in the Cape floristic region biodiversity hotspot. Biodivers Conserv 16:787–805. doi:10.1007/s10531-005-6201-3
Hamer ML, Slotow RH (2002) Conservation application of existing data for South African millipedes (Diplopoda). Afr Entomol 10:29–42
Hamer ML, Samways MJ, Ruhberg H (1997) A review of the Onychophora of South Africa, with discussion of their conservation. Ann Natal Mus 38:283–312
Helme NA, Trinder-Smith TH (2006) The endemic flora of the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. S Afr J Bot 72:205–210. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2005.07.004
Henning SF, Henning GA (1989) South African red data book: butterflies, South African National Scientific Program Report No 158. Foundation for Research Development, Pretoria
Hortal J, Borges PAV, Gaspar C (2006) Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators: sensitivity to sample grain size. J Anim Ecol 75:274–287. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01048.x
Jenkins DG, Rinne D (2008) Red herring of low illumination? The Peninsula effect revisited. J Biogeogr 35:2128–2137. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01943.x
Key KHL (1930) Preliminary ecological notes on the Acridiidae of the Cape Peninsula. S Afr J Sci 27:406–413
Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology: developing in environmental modelling 20. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Lomolino MV (2001) Elevation gradients of species-density: historical and prospective views. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:3–13. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00229.x
Manly BFJ (1990) Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, London
McCoy ED (1990) The distribution of insects along elevational gradients. Oikos 58:313–322. doi:10.2307/3545222
Mittermeier RA, Gil PR, Hoffmann M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux J, Da Fonseca GAB (2004) Hotspots revisited. Cemex, Mexico City
Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho, and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria
Novotny V, Basset Y (2000) Rare species in communities of tropical insect herbivores: pondering the mystery of singletons. Oikos 89:564–572. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890316.x
Olson DM (1994) The distribution of leaf-litter invertebrates along a neotropical altitudinal gradient. J Trop Ecol 10:129–150
Picker MD, Samways MJ (1996) Faunal diversity and endemicity of the Cape Peninsula, South Africa—a first assessment. Biodivers Conserv 5:591–606. doi:10.1007/BF00137611
Pinhey E (1979) Rediscovery of an elusive S.W. Cape dragonfly (Odonata). Arnoldia. Rhodesia 8:1–3
Pinhey E (1984) A survey of the dragonflies (Odonata) of South Africa, 1. J Entomol Soc S Afr 47:147–199
Pryke JS (2008) Conservation of the invertebrate fauna of the Cape Peninsula. Dissertation, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2008) Conservation of invertebrate biodiversity on a mountain in a global biodiversity hotspot, Cape floristic region. Biodivers Conserv 17:3027–3043. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9414-4
Rebelo AG (1992) Red data book species in the Cape floristic region—threats, priorities and target species. Trans R Soc S Afr 48:55–86
Romero-Alcaraz E, Avila JM (2000) Effect of elevation and type of habitat on the abundance and diversity of Scarabaeoid dung beetle (Scarabaeoidea) assemblages in a Mediterranean area from Southern Iberian Peninsula. Zool Stud 39:351–359
Samways MJ (2006) National Red List of South African Odonata. Odonatologica 35:341–368
Sharratt NJ, Picker MD, Samways MJ (2000) The invertebrate fauna of the sandstone caves of the Cape Peninsula (South Africa): patterns of endemism and conservation priorities. Biodivers Conserv 9:107–143. doi:10.1023/A:1008968518058
Simmons MT, Cowling RM (1996) Why is the Cape Peninsula so rich in plant species? An analysis of the independent diversity components. Biodivers Conserv 5:551–573. doi:10.1007/BF00137609
Stevens GC (1992) The elevational gradient in altitudinal range—an extension of Rapoport latitudinal rule to altitude. Am Nat 140:893–911. doi:10.1086/285447
Stiller M (2002) Leafhopper (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) diversity in the fynbos biome of South Africa. Denisia 04, zugleich Kataloge des OÖ Landesmuseums. Neue Folge 179:379–400
ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for windows: software for Canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca
ter Braak CJF, Verdonschot PFM (1995) Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat Sci 57:255–289. doi:10.1007/BF00877430
TrinderSmith TH, Lombard AT, Picker MD (1996) Reserve scenarios for the Cape Peninsula: high-, middle- and low-road options for conserving the remaining biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 5:649–669. doi:10.1007/BF00137613
Turner C (2007) Water beetles associated with reservoirs on Table Mountain, Cape Town: implications for conservation. J Insect Conserv 11:75–83. doi:10.1007/s10841-006-9020-2
Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Cape floral region protected areas (UNESCO) (2004) http://whc.unesco.org. Date Cited 27th Jan 2008
Acknowledgments
We thank the Table Mountain Fund (TMF) and the National Research Foundation (NRF) for financial support, South African National Parks (SANParks), South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) and the City of Cape Town access to sites, as well as Clive Turner, Henk Geertsma and Corey Bazelet for helping with the identification of various insect groups.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10841_2009_9213_MOESM1_ESM.jpg
Fig. 1 The Cape Peninsula, showing the locations of the Red Listed insect species (red circles) and range extensions (yellow circles) for the species sampled here. The map also gives the four quarters used to assess the possibility of the Peninsula effect, the areas of the Peninsula sampled and the various vegetation types. Vegetation information from Mucina and Rutherford (2006), topographical information from the Chief Directorate: Surveys and Mapping, South Africa © 2003. (JPG 3651 kb)
10841_2009_9213_MOESM2_ESM.jpg
Fig. 4 The Cape Peninsula, show the corrected average number of species per sampling station for each of the grids sampled. > 3.5, = 3–3.5, = 2.5–3, = 2–2.5, = 1.5–2, = 1–1.5, = 0.5–1 and < 0.5 species per sampling station, topographical information from the Chief Directorate: Surveys and Mapping, South Africa © 2003. (JPG 2104 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pryke, J.S., Samways, M.J. Conservation of the insect assemblages of the Cape Peninsula biodiversity hotspot. J Insect Conserv 13, 627–641 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-009-9213-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-009-9213-6