Journal of Family and Economic Issues

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 461–473 | Cite as

Family Financial Management and Individual Deprivation

  • Sara Cantillon
  • Bertrand Maître
  • Dorothy Watson
Original Paper


A core assumption in conventional poverty measurement is that household members share equally in total household income. This paper focuses on heterosexual couple households and asks to what extent male and female partners may derive different benefits from total couple resources. Drawing on the 2010 Irish Survey on Income and Living Conditions module, we examined the couple financial regime, by which we mean which partners received income, whether the income was from work, the extent to which income was contributed for the benefit of other household members and responsibility for decision-making. We explored whether the couple’s financial regime was associated with different living standard outcomes for the partners. Among the findings was the beneficial impact of having income from work and of shared responsibility for decision-making. The paper concludes by pointing to some implications for our understanding of power and bargaining in couples.


Intra-household inequality Poverty SILC Gender inequality Household financial management Income pooling 


  1. Apps, P. F., & Rees, R. (1988). Taxation and the household. Journal of Public Economics, 35(3), 355–369. doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(88)90037-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apps, P. F., & Rees, R. (2007). Household Models: An Historical Perspective (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2172). Retrieved from
  3. Becker, G. S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bergstrom, T. C. (1997). A survey of theories of the family. In M. R. Rosenzweig & O. Stark (Eds.), Handbook of Population and Family Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  5. Blood, R., & Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and Wives: The Dynamics of Married Living. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bonke, J., & Browning, M. (2009a). The allocation of expenditures within the household: A new survey. Fiscal Studies, 30(4), 461–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonke, J., & Browning, M. (2009b). Pooling of Income and Sharing of Consumption Within Households (Discussion Paper Series No. 428). Oxford: Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  8. Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender and the division of domestic labour at home. American Journal of Sociology 100(3), 652-688. Retrieved from
  9. Browning, M., Bourguignon, F., Chiappori, P.-A., & Lechene, V. (1994). Income and outcomes: A structural model of intra-household allocation. The Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1067–1096. Retrieved from
  10. Bütikofer, A., Gerfin, M., & Wanzenried, G. (2009). Income pooling and the distribution of individual consumption among couples in Switzerland. Retrieved from
  11. Cantillon, S. (2013). Measuring differences within households. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(3), 598–610. Retrieved from
  12. Cantillon, S., & Nolan, B. (1998). Are married women more deprived than their husbands? Journal of Social Policy, 27(2), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cantillon, S., & Nolan, B. (2001). Poverty within households: measuring gender differences using nonmonetary indicators. Feminist Economics, 7(1), 5–23. doi: 10.1018/135457001316854692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, Z., & Woolley, F. (2001). A Cournot-Nash model of family decision making. Economic Journal, 111(474), 722–748. Retrieved from
  15. Chiappori, P.-A. (1992). Collective labor supply and welfare’. Journal of Political Economy, 100(3), 437–467. Retrieved from
  16. CSO (Central Statistics Office). (2012). Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC): 2010. Dublin: Central Statistics Office. Retrieved from
  17. CSO (Central Statistics Office). (2013). Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC): 2011 and Revised 2010 Results. Dublin: Central Statistics Office.Google Scholar
  18. Evertsson, L., & Nyman, C. (2014). Perceptions and practices in independent management: Blurring the boundaries between “mine”, “yours” and “ours”. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 35(1), 65–80. doi: 10.1007/s10834-012-9348-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gershuny, J. (1992). The Domestic Labour Revolution: A Process of Lagged Adaption? Social Change in Contemporary Britain. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Goode, J., Callender, C., & Lister, R. (1998). Purse or Wallet? Gender Inequalities and Income Distribution within Families on Benefits. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Grossbard-Shechtman, A. (1984). A theory of allocation of time in markets for labor and marriage. Economic Journal, 94(376), 863–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haddad, L., & Kanbur, R. (1990). How serious is the neglect of intrahousehold inequality? Economic Journal, 100(402), 866–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holden, K. C. (2011). Introduction to the thematic issue on family finance. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 32(4), 552–553. doi: 10.1007/s10834-011-9278-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lauer, S. R., & Yodanis, C. (2011). Individualized marriage and the integration of resources. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(3), 669–683. doi: 10.1111/j-1741-37372011.00836x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Layte, R. (1999). Divided Time: Gender, Paid Employment and Domestic Labour. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, J., & Pocock, M. L. (2007). Intrahousehold allocation of financial resources: evidence from South Korean individual bank accounts. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(1), 41–58. doi: 10.1007/s1150-007-9004-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lundberg, S. J. & Pollak, R. A. (1993) Separate sphere bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 988–1010. Retrieved from
  28. Lundberg, S. J., Pollak, R. A., & Wales, T. J. (1997). Do husbands and wives pool their resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom child benefit. The Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 463–480. Retrieved from
  29. McElroy, M. B. & Horney, M. J. (1981). Nash bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review, 22(2), 333–349. Retrieved from
  30. Morris, L. (1990). The Workings of the Household. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Morris, L., & Ruane, S. (1989). Household Finance Management and the Labour Market. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  32. Nyman, C., & Dema, S. (2007). An overview: Research on couples and money. In J. Stocks, C. Diaz, & B. Halleröd (Eds.), Modern Couples Sharing Money, Sharing Life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Office for Social Inclusion. (2007). National Action Plan for Social Exclusion, 2007–2016. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  34. Pahl, J. (1989). Money and Marriage. Houndmills: Macmillan Education Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pahl, J. (2004). Individualization and patterns of money management within families. In Paper presented at ESPAnet conference, Oxford University, 9–11 September.Google Scholar
  36. Phipps, S. & Burton, P. (1998). What’s mine is yours? The influence of male and female incomes on patterns of household expenditures. Economica, 65(260), 599–613. Retrieved from
  37. Rake, K., & Jayatilaka, G. (2002). Home Truths: An Analysis of Financial Decision Making Within the Home. London: Fawcett Society.Google Scholar
  38. Rose, D., & Harrison, E. (2007). The European socio-economic classification: A new social class schema for European research. European Societies, 9(3), 459–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rottman, D. (1994). Income Distribution Within Irish Households: Allocating Resources Within Irish Families (Combat Poverty Agency Research Report Series No. 18). Dublin: Combat Poverty Agency.Google Scholar
  40. Samuelson, P. A. (1956). Social indifference curves. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Skogrand, L., Johnson, A. C., Horrocks, A. M., & DeFrain, J. (2011). Financial management practices of couples with great marriages. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 32(1), 27–35. doi: 10.1007/s10834-010-9195-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stier, H., & Lewin-Epstein, N. (2000). Women’s part-time employment and gender inequality in the family. Journal of Family Issues, 21(3), 390–410. doi: 10.1177/019251300021003006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household resource allocation: An inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources, 25, 635–664. Retrieved from
  44. Vogler, C. (1994). Money in the household. In M. Anderson, F. Bechhofer, & J. Gershuny (Eds.), The Social and Political Economy of the Household. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Vogler, C., Lyonette, C., & Wiggins, R. D. (2008). Money, power and spending decisions in intimate relationships. The Sociological Review, 56(1), 117–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.2008.00780x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Watson, D., Maître, B., & Cantillon, S. (2013). Implications of Income Pooling and Household Decision-making for the Measurement of Poverty and Deprivation: An Analysis of the SILC 2010 Special Module for Ireland (Social Inclusion Technical Paper No. 4). Dublin: Department of Social Protection.Google Scholar
  47. Watson, D., Maître, B., & Whelan, C. (2012). Work and Poverty in Ireland: An Analysis of the CSO Survey on Income and Living Conditions 2004–2010. Dublin: ESRI and Department of Social Protection.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, R. (2012). Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. The Stata Journal, 12(2), 308–331.Google Scholar
  49. Wilson, G. (1987). Money in the Family. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Cantillon
    • 1
  • Bertrand Maître
    • 2
  • Dorothy Watson
    • 2
  1. 1.GCUGlasgowUK
  2. 2.ESRIDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations