Correction to: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
The original article unfortunately contained 2 mistakes. 1) In the Result section of high responders in the main text, “Fresh and cumulative LBR did not differ significantly for IVF and ICSI patients (145/468 (31%) vs. 32/87 (36.7%) and 287/468 (61.3%) vs. 52/87 (59.8%), p value = 0.3 and 0.8, respectively))” should be “Fresh and cumulative LBR did not differ significantly for ICSI and IVF patients .........” . 2) There was a wrong transformation of percentages for fresh and cumulative LBR (from the Table to Fig. 3b). Please see below the revised Fig. 3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01563-1
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drakopoulos, P., Garcia-Velasco, J., Bosch, E. et al. Correction to: ICSI does not offer any benefit over conventional IVF across different ovarian response categories in non-male factor infertility: a European multicenter analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 36, 2077–2078 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01586-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01586-8