Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 3679–3687 | Cite as

Attachment strength of the subtidal seaweed Sargassum horneri (Turner) C. Agardh varies among development stages and depths

  • Min Xu
  • Shingo Sakamoto
  • Teruhisa Komatsu
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Sargassum horneri is one of the most important contributors to the rafts of floating seaweed in the waters off the coasts of northeastern Asia. These rafts serve as spawning and nursery grounds for many marine organisms, including Japanese saury and yellowtail. Thus, the details of the attachment/detachment mechanisms of S. horneri are of commercial significance for the aquaculture industry. Here, we describe variations in the attachment strength of S. horneri as it relates to its developmental stage and depth along a bottom gradient. We measured the attachment strength/dislodgement force of S. horneri samples with holdfast detachment in Shidagaura Cove, Shimoda, Japan, from December 2014 to May 2015. After we had determined the dislodgement forces required to detach thalli from the substratum (using a spring scale device) in the field, we transferred released individuals to the laboratory and measured selected morphological traits. Attachment strength was linearly related to the holdfast basal area when thalli were immature (prior to mid-March), but not when they were mature (mid-March to May). Thus, attachment strength was maintained through the reproductive phase and declined thereafter, allowing released thalli to join the drifting raft community. Rafting may be a mechanism by which the species expands its distribution range, as floating thalli continuing to shed germlings that are able to recruit when suitable habitat is encountered. Attachment strengths were greater in the shallows than in deeper water, reflecting the differences in wave forces experienced at different depths.

Keywords

Sargassum horneri Phaeophyceae Attachment strength Maturity stages Depth 

Introduction

Sargassum horneri (Turner) C. Agardh is an annual brown seaweed species that is common along northwestern Pacific coastlines. Germlings released from the receptacles settle on different substrata in the spring–summer period and develop into visible immature thalli in autumn to winter as rhizoids grow forming holdfast and the lengths and weights of the developing seaweed increase. Thalli mature in spring. Dense forests develop on hard substrata, such as bedrock or boulders, surviving from depths of 1–3 m (Umezaki 1984; Komatsu et al. 2014). Populations grow down from the surface layer into the subtidal zone, reaching depths >7 m. On the Sanriku coasts of Japan, S. horneri forms stands of thalli that are attached to the bottom to a depth of 7 m and float upward, forming canopies on the sea surface (Komatsu et al. 2015). When mature thalli reach maximum lengths in the spring–early summer period, they are readily detached from the bottom by wave action with or without their holdfasts. When the holdfasts are torn off the substratum, the drag force created by waves has exceeded the attachment strength of the holdfast (Yoshida 1963). The thalli have many gas-filled vesicles that provide buoyancy for the floating canopy. Detached thalli float on the surface and often form rafts of tangled seaweed (Komatsu et al. 2006). A large number of floating S. horneri rafts occurred in the southern Yellow Sea drifting from south to north (Cai et al. 2014), and they were shown by genetic markers to be from Zhejiang province, China and Jiangling, Korea (Chen et al. 2016).

Floating seaweed rafts provide important ocean habitats for a diversity of fish (Senta 1986; Cho et al. 2001; Thiel and Gutow 2005). In the spring–early summer period, most of the floating rafts on Japanese coastlines contain detached thalli of S. horneri (Yoshida 1963; Ikehara 2004), and in the East China Sea, the floating rafts contain only S. horneri fronds (Komatsu et al. 2007, 2009, 2014; Mizuno et al. 2014), on which commercially important pelagic fish lay their eggs. These fish species include flying fish, Pacific saury (Cololabis saira), and Japanese halfbeak (Hyporhamphus sajori), which spawn egg-bearing filaments that attach to the floating seaweed rafts (Komatsu et al. 2009). Juveniles of yellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata) and Japanese horse mackerel (Trachurus japonicus) find habitat in the floating seaweed rafts (Senta 1986). The Japanese yellowtail aquaculture industry captures these wild juveniles along with the floating rafts they inhabit and uses them to stock rearing facilities. This procedure is necessary because carnivorous juveniles of yellowtail prevent marine farmers from rearing the species from eggs. The farmers call yellowtail juveniles mojyako, mo and jyako meaning seaweed and juveniles in the Japanese language, respectively. A supply of floating S. horneri rafts is crucial for this industry. Hence, information on the wave forces required to detach the thalli is relevant to this form of aquaculture.

Kawamata (2001) studied the dislodgement of Saccharina japonica (Areschoug) Lane, Mayes, Druehl & Saunders on wave-sheltered and wave-exposed coasts. He transplanted individuals from wave-sheltered areas to wave-exposed areas, where thalli were quickly detached. Thus, the wave force environment experienced by seaweeds early in their life most likely affects the strength of their attachment to hard substrata. Sugawara et al. (1998) found that the attachment strength of Eisenia bicyclis (Kjellman) Setchell in shallow water exceeded that of Ecklonia cava Kjellman attached in deeper water at the same study site. Sugawara et al. (1998) postulated that the disparity in attachment strengths reflected differences in wave force as a function of depths. Drag forces are greater in shallower water. In an expectation that attachment strength of S. horneri adapts to environment pressures, we examined the attachment strength of S. horneri along a depth gradient.

Environmental conditions, such as storminess, season, and water temperature, may affect the attachment strength of algae. Milligan and DeWreede (2000) found a statistically significant difference in the attachment strengths of individuals of the intertidal seaweed species Hedophyllum sessile (C. Agardh) Setchell in a pre-storm group and those in a post-storm group. As storminess changed by season, they concluded that there was a seasonal effect on attachment strength that increased resistance to storms. Thus, we postulated that the attachment strength of S. horneri might change among growth stages and months.

To improve our understanding of factors influencing the supply of floating S. horneri rafts in the zones extending seaward from the coast to offshore waters, we studied attachment strengths of thalli as a function of growth stage, maturity stage, and depth. The analyses were performed in situ.

Materials and methods

Study site and sampling

The study site (34° 39′ 58″ N,138° 56′ 31″ E) was located in Shidagaura Cove, Shimoda, Izu Peninsular, Japan, which contains a wave-sheltered rocky shore close to the Shimoda Marine Research Center, Tsukuba University. Field surveys were conducted at intervals of ca. 1 month during the period of 15 December 2014 through 28 May 2015. During each survey, SCUBA divers randomly (random among thallus length and depth) sampled ca. 20–40 individuals of S. horneri that were attached at depths between 0 and 4 m below the mean low tide level (MTL) in Shimoda Port.

The force required to dislodge each individual was determined with spring scales measuring to 5 or 10 kg. A piece of twine was attached around each stipe immediately above the holdfast and looped onto the scale spring. The twine was pulled away from the rock surface until the holdfast released or broke, as described by Sugawara et al. (1998). The scale pointer recorded the maximum force exerted, and this measure was used as an indicator of the force required to: (i) dislodge the holdfast or the substratum surface to which it was attached or (ii) break the stipe or holdfast. This force was used as an indicator of attachment strength. The water depth in which the holdfast of each measured individual occurred was recorded during the survey. Through morphological examination, we classified dislodgement types into the following categories: (1) main stipe with an entire holdfast and (2) stipe detached from the substratum without a holdfast (Table 1). That main stipe detached from the substrate without a holdfast was precluded from further statistical analysis.
Table 1

Dislodgement force category assignments for Sargassum horneri thalli from December 2014 to May 2015

Month

Stem breakage

Dislodgement with holdfasta

Other

Total

December

0

29

1 (data lost)

30

January

1

28

1 (aggregated heptera)

30

February

4

25

1 (substrate: crustacea and coralline algae)

30

March

2

17

1 (attached to E. bicyclis holdfast)

20

April

2

17

1 (data lost)

20

May

1

38

1 (data lost)

40

a Thallus dislodgement force data were used in the statistical tests

Thalli collected by the divers were individually numbered and transported to a laboratory where we obtained measurements of linear size and the weights of the thallus. When a whole holdfast or part of a holdfast remained on the substratum after testing attachment strength, we removed it from the substratum for measurements of area and weight. Samples were kept at −30 °C in a freezer until they were analyzed. After thawing, we measured thallus length from the bottom of the holdfast to the top of the longest lateral branch (with an accuracy of ±1 cm) using a 30-cm ruler. We used a balance to measure the wet weights of the thalli (with an accuracy of ±2 g) after absorbing surface water with a paper towel. The basal outline of each holdfast was drawn onto tracing paper with a pencil and digitized using an image scanner (GT-X970, Epson). The area of each holdfast was calculated using image analysis software, ImageJ 6.4 (NIH, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij), following calibration with a square of known area (5 cm × 5 cm).

Statistical analyses

We used one-way ANOVA to detect significant differences in measured attachment strength as a function of depth at 1-m depth intervals. Data were log transformed to fit the assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity required by this parametric procedure. Pearson correlation was applied in relationships among morphological traits and dislodgement force.

Results

Changes in dislodgement force by month

The mean force required for dislodgement of the samples increased from December 2014 to April 2015 as thalli increased in weight (Fig. 1). However, values decreased sharply in late May 2015. The mean wet weight of the samples was highest in April 2015 and declined rapidly in late May 2015 as most of the larger thalli disappeared. The maximum attachment strength in each month was stable (ca. 90 N). Two of the attachment strengths in April were >100 N, but values for most of the other samples in that month were ≤90 N and similar to those in other months. The minimum attachment strengths were in the range of 4.5 to 21.1 N (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

Mean thallus lengths (cm) and wet weights (g), and dislodgement forces (N) measured monthly from December 2014 through May 2015. Values are means ± SD

Fig. 2

Mean (± SD) (left column), minimum (filled bar), and maximum (open bar) dislodgement forces (N) (right column) measured along the depth gradient from 0 to 4 m below the mean tide level for each month from December 2014 through May 2015

Dislodgement force variation across a depth gradient

Dislodgement force did not vary significantly with depth (p > 0.05, Table 2) (the ratio of between-group variance to within-group variance was less than the statistical F variable F crit (p = 0.05), indicating that there was no statistically significant difference among depth groups). However, mean dislodgement forces of the shallow samples tended to exceed those in deeper water from December to May (Fig. 2). Both maximum and minimum dislodgement forces seemed to increase from December to February across the depth gradient.
Table 2

One-way ANOVA testing for statistical differences in dislodgement force along the depth gradient from December 2014 to May 2015

 

Analysis of variance (one-way)

Stage

Month

Source of variation

MS

F

p value

F crit

Growth

15 December

Between groups

0.20

2.72

0.11

4.24

 

Within groups

0.07

   

28 January

Between groups

0.31

2.70

0.09

3.44

 

Within groups

0.11

   

25 February

Between groups

0.02

0.33

0.57

4.32

 

Within groups

0.07

   

Mature

31 March

Between groups

0.01

0.14

0.71

4.67

 

Within groups

0.05

   

28 Aprila

Between groups

0.03

0.72

0.42

4.84

 

Within groups

0.04

   
 

28 May

Between groups

0.36

0.51

0.60

3.29

 

Within groups

0.71

   

aOnly measurements collected for depths of 1–2 and 2–3 m were included in the analyses of thalli sampled on 28 April 2014 because the sample size for the 0–1 m depth range on that date was too small for inferential testing (two samples only)

Monthly changes in dislodgement force in relation to thallus growth

Thallus length and wet weight had no relationship with dislodgement force across months (Fig. 3). However, holdfast basal area was linearly related to dislodgement force in January and February, though not from March to May (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3

Relationships between dislodgement force (N) and (i) thallus length (cm) (left column) and (ii) wet weight (g) (right column) for each month from December 2014 through May 2015

Fig. 4

Relationship between dislodgement force (N) and holdfast basal area (cm2) for each month from December 2014 through May 2015. Solid lines are regression fits. Asterisk indicates significant linear correlations in January 2015 (r 2 = 0.86, p < 0.001) and February 2015 (r 2 = 0.81, p < 0.001)

Monthly changes in holdfast basal area across a depth gradient

The mean monthly holdfast basal area of shallow water samples exceeded that of deeper samples from December to March, but not in April or May (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Mean holdfast basal areas (cm2) (open bar) (±SD) measured along the depth gradient from 0 to 4 m below the mean tide level for each month from December 2014 through May 2015

Discussion

Holdfast basal area was strongly related to dislodgement force from December to February. Thallus length and wet weight were not related to this force. The holdfast area in contact with the substratum fastens the thallus in position and accounts for the attachment strength of each individual. Kawamata (2001) found that the holdfast wet weight of S. japonica in a wave-exposed area was linearly related to attachment strength (r 2 = 0.57, p < 0.05). Holdfast performance is crucial to the ability of a seaweed to remain fastened in place on the bottom. Holdfast wet weight is likely correlated with holdfast basal area. We found that the attachment strength of S. horneri was proportional to holdfast area.

Mikami (2007) set three permanent quadrats in an area of Shidagaura Cove where S. horneri was dominant and tagged all the stipes in each quadrat. She reported that mature stipes were found in mid-March but disappeared in May. Accordingly, samples in the December–February period were classified as immature and those occurring in the late March–May period were classified as mature. Holdfast basal area was proportional to attachment strength during the immature stage (r 2 = 0.53, p < 0.001) (Fig. 6), and we consider this relationship a morphological adaptation for thallus fixation.
Fig. 6

Relationship between dislodgement force (N) and holdfast basal area (cm2) for immature and mature thalli (December 2014–February 2015 and March 2015–May 2015, respectively). Solid lines are regression fits. Asterisk indicates significant linear correlation in the immature stage (r 2 = 0.67, p < 0.001)

S. horneri is an annual, dioecious species. Germlings are released over several days (3–4 days at a water temperature of 20 °C) after fertilization of eggs in the female receptacles (Koumoto and Tomiyama 1968). Koumoto and Tomiyama (1968) found that 25–50 % of eggs were released onto the surface of the receptacles during a first liberation period and that the remaining eggs were released 2 weeks later. Tahara (1913) reported that five egg release events occurred in S. horneri at intervals of 7–12 days during an approximately 1-month study on the Misaki Peninsular near Tokyo. Germlings were released from female receptacles on several occasions during the mature stage. The mean sedimentation velocity of S. horneri germlings was ca. 0.5 cm s−1 (germlings are heavier than seawater) (Okuda 1985). Since the receptacles were 3 m above the bottom, the germlings took ca. 10 min to reach the substratum with most settling around their parent thalli where the substratum and other environmental conditions are likely appropriate for growth and persistence. The fixation capability of the germlings is a significant contributory factor in population survival, but restricts the colonization of new habitats.

We found that holdfast basal area was not related to attachment strength in the mature stage from April to May. Floating adults and heavy germlings are common among Sargassum species. Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt was accidentally transported with seed oysters from Japan to France in the 1960s. Rueness (1989) reported that floating S. muticum rafts occurred along the Skagerrak coastline of Norway in 1984; individuals fixed to the bottom were not found until 1988. Detachment and floating of mature thalli may be regarded as a strategy for colonizing new territory, while germling fixation is a strategy for persistence in the natal habitat. Seaweeds with gas bladders commonly float out of the territories in which they recruited. Hernández et al. (2006) reported that sporophytes of drifting Macrocystis pyrifera (L) C. Agardh remained fertile with high germination success as long as the sori were present on the blades (sori persisted for 125 days). Rafting bull kelp (Durvillaea antarctica (Chamisso) Hariot) off north/central Chile was also found to be fertile (Tala et al. 2013).

In the early maturation stage, S. horneri stopped growing and invested energy into reproduction through the production of receptacles. Thalli remain fixed to the substratum. Hence, the first germlings were able to attach near their parents. A secure holdfast attachment is crucial at this phase. After release and fixation of early germlings, the attachment strength of mature S. horneri was not maintained, although sexual reproduction continued. Mature individuals started to lose their fixation capability and were readily dislodged when germling release had been completed. In late March, the individuals at our study site comprised a mixture of immature and mature thalli (Mikami 2007), which obscured any relationship between holdfast basal area and dislodgment force.

Most of the individuals had matured by April–May when holdfast basal area was not related to attachment strength in the Shidagaura Cove population. Attachment strength was markedly lower in May than it had been in April. The population in March contained individuals with no significant relationship between holdfast basal area and dislodgment force and others in which the two parameters were correlated; the two groups comprised mature and immature thalli, respectively.

Our dislodgment force measurements along the depth gradient also reflected maturity status. During the immature stage, attachment strength was highest in shallow water. Stewart (2006) transplanted Turbinaria ornata (Turner) J. Agardh between back reef and fore reef zones to investigate the adaptation of this species to wave-exposed environments. All of the samples transplanted from the back reef to the fore reef disappeared, but samples transplanted in the reverse direction were still alive when the experiment was terminated, suggesting that attachment strengths were highest in thalli that had developed in wave-exposed habitats. Kawamata (2001) obtained similar results when S. japonica thalli attached to plastic plates were transplanted between wave-protected and wave-exposed sites. The attachment strengths of Stephanocystis hakodatensis in wave-exposure sites exceeded those in wave-protected sites (Kuwahara et al. 1999). Thus, our findings were concordant with those of previous studies and indicate that S. horneri adapts to wave forces by increasing its holdfast attachment strength.

The force required to dislodge S. hakodatensis in wave-exposed sites ranged from 60 to 140 N (mean = 100 N) (Kuwahara et al. 1999). Milligan and DeWreede (2000) measured similar dislodgement forces (mean = ∼100 N) for the intertidal seaweed H. sessile (C. Agardh) Setchell. S. horneri generally grows in wave-protected waters, where the disparity of maximum and minimum dislodgement forces ranged from 67 to 85 N, varying by month. Our measurements were comparable to those of other studies that have examined seaweed species living in the intertidal zone or at wave-exposed sites. The lowest dislodgement forces that we determined for S. horneri thalli were in the range of 4.5 to 21.1 N, varying by month. The dislodgement forces required to release S. japonica at wave-protected sites were also <20 N (Kawamata 2001). The thalli of S. horneri are not especially robust considering the large dimensions that they attain during a single growing season. This may explain the restricted occurrence of the species to wave-protected waters (Marui et al. 1981; Umezaki 1984; Terawaki 1986; Sun et al. 2008).

In conclusion, this is a novel study of seasonal variation in S. horneri attachment strength. During the immature stages of growth, holdfast basal area was a major determinant of attachment strength, required to prevent dislodgement by wave action, but this was not the case when thalli were mature. Tenacious attachment during reproduction ensures that germlings settle close to parents where habitat conditions are likely favorable for the species. Weak attachment at later stages allows thalli to drift and potentially colonize new habitats by releasing germlings during the rafting phase. Thus, the species appears to have a strategy for persistence in its home environment and another for increasing its distribution range.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank to Mr. Yasutaka Tsuchiya, Hideo Shinagawa, and Toshihiko Sato of Shimoda Marine Research Center of Tsukuba University for their helps to field experiments and to members of Laboratory of Behavior, Ecology and Observation Systems, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo for their constructive discussions and encouragements. The first author thanks to Ministry of Education, Culture, Science and Sports of Japan (MEXT) for giving him Japanese Government (Monbukagakusho) Scholarship. This study was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A), No. 22255010 from Japan Society for Promotion of Science and Japanese Association of Marine Biology (JAMBIO) of Shimoda Marine Research Center, Tsukuba University.

References

  1. Cai YC, Sun B, Ma JH, He PM, Zhang Q (2014) Molecular identification of floating Sargassum horneri in the southern Yellow Sea. Mar Fish/Haiyang Yuye 9:102–106 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  2. Chen J, Wang YC, Yu QR, Bi YH, He PM, Liu ZY, Qin S (2016) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of floating Sargassum horneri associated with green tides in coastal area of Qingdao. J Biol 33(1):39–42 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  3. Cho SH, Myoung JG, Kim JM (2001) Fish fauna associated with drifting seaweed in the coastal area of Tongyeong, Korea. Trans Am Fish Soc 130:1190–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hernández CG, Hughes B, Graham MH (2006) Reproductive longevity of drifting kelp Macrocystis pyrifera (Phaeophyceae) in Monterey Bay, USA. J Phycol 42:1199–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ikehara K (2004) Seasonal variations and distribution of floating seaweeds in Japan Sea. Kaiyo Monthly 36(6):446–457 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  6. Kawamata S (2001) Adaptive mechanical tolerance and dislodgement velocity of the kelp Laminaria japonica in wave-induced water motion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 211:89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Komatsu T, Mikami A, Matsunaga D (2006) Distribution of floating seaweeds in East China Sea. Kaiyo Monthly 38(11):807–810 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  8. Komatsu T, Tatsukawa K, Filippi JB, Sagawa T, Matsunaga D, Mikami A, Ishida K, Ajisaka T, Tanaka K, Aoki M, Wang WD, Liu FL, Zhang SY, Zhou MD, Sugimoto T (2007) Distribution of drifting seaweeds in eastern East China Sea. J Mar Syst 67:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Komatsu T, Mikami A, Ajisaka T, Uwai S, Aoki M, Tanaka K, Fukuda M, Kokubu Y, Tanaka K, Michida Y, Sugimoto T (2009) Ecological characteristics of drifting seaweed rafts composed of Sargassum species. Bull Coast Oceanogr 46:127–136 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  10. Komatsu T, Mizuno S, Alabsi N, Kantachumpoo A, Tanaka K, Morimoto A, Hsiao ST, Rothäusler EA, Shishidou H, Aoki M, Ajisaka T (2014) Unusual distribution of floating seaweeds in the East China Sea in the early spring of 2012. J Appl Phycol 26:1169–1179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Komatsu T, Ohtaki T, Sakamoto S, Sawayama S, Hamana Y, Shibata M, Shibata K, Sasa S (2015) Impact of the 2011 Tsunami on seagrass and seaweed beds in Otsuchi Bay, Sanriku Coast, Japan. In: Ceccaldi H-J, Hénocque Y, Koike Y, Komatsu T, SDtora G, Tusseau-Vuillemin M-H (eds), Marine Productivity: Perturbations and Resilience of socio-ecosystems. Springer, pp 43–53Google Scholar
  12. Koumoto Y, Tomiyama A (1968) Collection of spores and their culture using synthetic fibers as collector. Aquacult Sci 16:87–95 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  13. Kuwahara H, Kaneta T, Kawai T (1999) Attachment limits on the substratum for adult and sporophytes of Cystoseira hakodatensis (Yendo) Fensholt under roles of waves. Proc Int Sess, Coast Eng J 46:1146–1150 (in Japanese with English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marui M, Inai S, Yoshida T (1981) Growth and maturation of six species of Sargassum and Cystoseira (Phaeophyta, Fucales) in Oshoro Bay, Hokkaido, Japan. Jpn J Phycol 29:277–281 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  15. Mikami A (2007) Estimating the net primary production of Sargassum species (Phaeophyceae) throughout different life stages: from fixation to drifting. Dissertation, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo. (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  16. Milligan KLD, DeWreede RE (2000) Variations in holdfast attachment mechanics with developmental stage, substratum-type, season and wave-exposure for the intertidal kelp species Hedophyllum sessile (C.Agardh) Setchell. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 254:189–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mizuno S, Ajisaka T, Lahbib S, Kokubu Y, Alabsi MN, Komatsu T (2014) Spatial distributions of floating seaweeds in the East China Sea from late winter to early spring. J Appl Phycol 26:1159–1167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Okuda T (1985) Obtaining germlings of some Sargassum species and their settlement mechanisms. Kaiyo Monthly 17(1):38–44 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. Rueness J (1989) Sargassum muticum and other introduced Japanese macroalgae. Mar Pollut Bull 20:173–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Senta T (1986) Mechanism that juvenile fishes accompany drifting seaweeds. Kaiyo Monthly 18:712–718 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  21. Stewart HL (2006) Morphological variation and phenotypic plasticity of buoyancy in the macroalga Turbinaria ornata across a barrier reef. Mar Biol 149:721–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sugawara A, Seto M, Komatsu T (1998) Study on the zonation of macro algae: vertical distribution and current environments in Eisenia bicyclis Setchell and Ecklonia cava Kjellman. Proc Civil Eng Ocean 14:29–34 (in Japanese with English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sun JZ, Chen WD, Zhuang DG, Zheng HY, Lin L, Pang SJ (2008) In situ ecological studies of the subtidal brown alga Sargassum horneri (Turner) C. Agardh at Nanji Island of China. S China Fish Sci 4:58–63 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  24. Tahara M (1913) Oogonium liberation and the embryogeny of some fucaceous algae. J Coll Sci, Imperial Univ Tokyo, Jpn 32(9):1–13Google Scholar
  25. Tala F, Gómez I, Luna JG, Thiel M (2013) Morphological, physiological and reproductive conditions of rafting bull kelp (Durvillaea antarctica) in northern-central Chile (30°S). Mar Biol 160:1339–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Terawaki T (1986) Growth and maturation of Sargassum horneri (Turner) C. Agardh in Odawa Bay, Miura Peninsula. Suisanzoshoku 33:177–181 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  27. Thiel M, Gutow L (2005) The ecology of rafting in the marine environment. 1. The floating substrata. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 42:181–263Google Scholar
  28. Umezaki I (1984) Ecological studies of Sargassum horneri (Turner) C. Agardh in Obama Bay, Japan Sea. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 50:1193–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yoshida T (1963) Studies on the distribution and drift of the floating seaweed. Bull Tohoku Reg Fish Res Lab 23:141–186 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Atmosphere and Ocean Research InstituteThe University of TokyoKashiwa CityJapan

Personalised recommendations