Advertisement

Interchange

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 363–377 | Cite as

How Preservice Teachers Engage in the Process of (De)Colonization: Findings from an International Field Experience in Honduras

  • Suniti Sharma
  • Jubin Rahatzad
  • JoAnn Phillion
Article

Abstract

Critical multicultural education and its promise of cultural inclusion face a crisis induced by powerful neoliberal forces that view education as an economic enterprise rather than open dialogue and inclusive pedagogies. With this in mind, this article uses interpretive phenomenology to examine how US American preservice teachers engage in the process of decolonization to challenge neoliberal influences in education and develop multicultural awareness during an international cross-cultural field experience in Honduras. Participants in this study comprise seventy-six preservice teachers from a Mid-Western university who went on a study abroad program to Honduras. Data for the study were collected through interviews, discussions, class assignments, reflective journals and researchers’ field notes and observations. Multiple levels of data analysis reveal that international cross-cultural field experiences promote a deeper understanding of colonial social relations and questioning of powerful neoliberal networks that perpetuate the status quo to disadvantage diverse and minority students. Findings also indicate that through reflexive and critical dialogue preservice teachers negotiate difference, engage with the self and other, and question their own knowledge and practices in sustaining colonial relations of privilege and domination with implications for classroom practice. This study suggests that ongoing multicultural awareness at every stage of teacher preparation, beginning at the preservice level, has the power to effect change in future classroom practice so that all students, including diverse minority populations experience educational equity and equal opportunities for academic success.

Keywords

Preservice teachers Neoliberal influences Decolonization Multicultural awareness International field experience Study abroad 

References

  1. Apple, M. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform. Educational Policy, 18(1), 12–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asher, N. (2007). Made in the (multicultural) USA: Unpacking tensions of race, culture, gender, and sexuality. Educational Researcher, 36(2), 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asher, N. (2010). Decolonizing curriculum. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 393–402). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Banks, J. (2004). Teaching for social justice, diversity and citizenship in a global world. Educational Forum, 68, 296–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentz, V. M., & Shapiro, J. J. (1998). Mindful enquiry in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Walking the road: Race, diversity and social justice in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Colón-Muñiz, A., SooHoo, S., & Brignoni, E. (2010). Language, culture and dissonance: A study course for globally minded teachers with possibilities for catalytic transformation. Teaching Education, 21(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Giroux, H. A. (2004). The terror of neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the eclipse of democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Giroux, H. A. (2008). Against the terror of neoliberalism: Politics beyond the age of greed. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Jaramillo, N. E. (2012). Occupy, recuperate and decolonize. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 10(1), 67–75.Google Scholar
  12. Kinginger, C. (2009). American students abroad: Negotiation of difference? Language Teaching, 43(2), 216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Loutzenheiser, L. W. (2010). Can we learn queerly? Normativity and social justice pedagogies. In T. K. Chapman & N. Hobbel (Eds.), Social justice pedagogy across the curriculum (pp. 121–143). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Ogden, A. (2007). The view from the veranda: Understanding today’s colonial students. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 15, 2–20.Google Scholar
  16. Papastergiadis, N. (2000). The turbulence of migration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Phillion, J., Malewski, E., Rodriguez, E., Shirley, V., Kulago, H., & Bulington, J. (2008). Promise and perils of study abroad: White privilege revival. In T. Huber (Ed.), Teaching and learning diversity: International perspectives on social justice and human rights (pp. 365–382). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  18. Rahatzad, J., Ware, J., & Haugen, M. (2013). Chocolate covered twinkies: Social justice and superficial aims in teacher education. In L. C. de Oliveira (Ed.), Teacher education for social justice: Perspectives and lessons learned. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  19. Sharma, S. (2009). From the red-dot-woman to jet-set mangoes and all the hyphens in-between: Studying abroad and discovering myself. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 25(3), 119–136.Google Scholar
  20. Sleeter, C. (2008). Equity, democracy and neoliberal assaults on teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1947–1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeichner, K. M. (2009). Teacher education and the struggle for social justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Teacher EducationSaint Joseph’s UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2. Beering Hall of Liberal Arts and Education, College of EducationPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations