Abstract
There is a growing literature that examines the effects of the Internet on political participation. We seek to contribute to this literature by exploring how online social networking may stimulate online political participation. Using survey data from the Pew Internet & American Life Project, we confirm a strong positive relationship and show that this effect is driven by the level of political exchange within networks. Further, we explore the potential for the Internet to dissipate traditional cleavages in participation that tend to mirror the inequalities in the availability and use of technology. The findings suggest that while many of the “have-nots” do engage in online networking at higher rates than their counterparts, they are less likely to be exposed to political exchanges within their networks. As a result, the effect of online networking on participation is more pronounced for the “haves.” We discuss the implications of these findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As typical in survey research, there were some missing values in these data. We replaced these values to avoid the loss of cases in the analysis by imputing the missing values in the full and subsamples. Little's MCAR test indicated that the data were not missing completely at random (p < 0.001). They may be missing at random (MAR). Thus, listwise deletion may have biased our estimates. We imputed the missing values using a multiple imputation process. Five replicate datasets were created based on the data, and the missing data in each replication were substituted with draws from the posterior distribution of the missing value conditional on observed values (Little and Rubin 1987; see also Horton and Lipsitz 2001). The analyses that follow are based on pooled results of the five replicate imputed datasets.
The question wording of all these variables is included in the Appendix.
This model is also based on a subsample due to filtering questions in the survey. It includes only those respondents who claim to use the Internet, email, gather information about the election, and who have created an online profile.
References
Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27(2), 183–216.
Bode, L. (2012). Facebooking it to the polls: a study in online social networking and political behavior. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 9(4), 352–369.
Boulianne, S. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood.
Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. M. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023.
Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2001). The private roots of public action: gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Carpini, D., Michael, X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfeld, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4).
Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. (2007). The electronic ballot box: a rational voting model and the internet. American Review of Politics, 28(Spring and Summer), 19–35.
Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2011). Rebooting American politics: the internet revolution. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Gant, M., & Lyons, W. (1993). Democratic theory, non-voting, and public policy: the 1972–1988 presidential elections. American Politics Quarterly, 21(2), 185–204.
Hill, K. Q., & Leighley, J. E. (1993). Party ideology, organization, and competitiveness as mobilizing forces in gubernatorial elections. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1158–1178.
Hoge, P. (January 26, 2009). Facebook dethrones MySpace. Jacksonville Business Journal.
Horton, N. J., & Lipsitz, S. R. (2001). Multiple imputation in practice: comparison of software packages for regression models with missing variables. The American Statistician, 55, 244–254.
Klofstad, C. A. (2007). Talk leads to recruitment: how discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation. Political Research Quarterly, 60(2), 180–191.
Klofstad, C. A. (2009). Civic talk and civic participation: the moderating effect of individual predispositions. American Politics Research, 37(5), 856–878.
La Due Lake, R., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19(3), 567–584.
Leighley, J. E., & Nagler, J. (1992). Socioeconomic bias in turnout 1964–1988: the voters remain the same. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 725–736.
Lenhart, A. (2009). Adults and social network websites. Pew Internet & American Life Project, January 14. Washington: Pew Research Center. Available: http://www.pewInternet.org/Reports/2009/Adults-and-Social-Network-Websites.aspx.. Accessed: 18 March 2010.
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley. Led by Facebook, Twitter, global time spend on social media sites up 82 % year over year. Nielsenwire.com, January 22, 2010. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/led-by-facebook-twitter-global-time-spent-on-social-media-sites-up-82-year-over-year/. Accessed: 15 March 2010.
McClurg, S. D. (2003). Social networks and political participation: the role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 449–464.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: beyond the digital divide. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: the internet, society and participation. Cambridge: MIT.
Nielson (2010). Led by Facebook, Twitter, Global Time Spent on Social Media Sites up 82 % Year over Year. Available: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/led-by-facebook-twitterglobal-time-spent-on-social-media-sites-up-82-year-over-year/. Accessed: 25 January 2013.
Nyland, R., Raquel, M., & Jason, B. (2007). MySpace: social networking or social isolation? Paper Presented at the Midwinter Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, February 23–24, Reno.
Pasek, J., More, E., & Romer, D. (2009). Realizing the social internet? Online social networking meets offline civic engagement. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 6(3/4), 197–215.
Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: how increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577–592.
Putnam, R. D. (1995a). Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. In R. G. Niemi & H. F. Weisberg (Eds.), Controversies in voting behavior. Washington: CQ.
Putnam, R. D. (1995b). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Putnam, R. D., Feldstein, L. M., & Cohen, D. (2003). Better together: restoring the American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Scheufele, D. A., & Shah, D. V. (2000). Personality strength and social capital—the role of dispositional and informational variables in the production of civic participation. Communication Research, 27(2), 107–131.
Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2010). Weapon of the strong? Participatory inequality and the Internet. Perspectives on Politics., 8(2), 487–509.
Schuller T. (2000). Social and human capital: the search for appropriate technomethodology. Policy Studies, 21(1), 25–35.
Shah, D. V. (1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: an individual-level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology, 19(3), 469–496.
Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., & Lance Holbert, R. (2001). ‘Connecting’ and ‘disconnecting’ with civic life: patterns of internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18(2), 141–162.
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901.
Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: political democracy and social equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wagner, K., & Gainous, J. (2009). Electronic grassroots: does online campaigning work. Journal of Legislative Studies, 15(4), 502–520.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
All variables centered between 0 and 1.
-
Online political participation
-
1.
About how often do you send email to friends, family members, or others urging them to support a candidate or to discuss the campaign? (No, yes)
-
2.
I’m going to read a list of things you may or may not have done online in the past several months. Just tell me if you happened to do each one: (no/yes)
-
(A)
Contributed money online to a candidate running for public office?
-
(B)
Signed up to receive email from candidates or campaigns?
-
(C)
Posted your own political commentary or writing to an online news group, website, or blog?
-
(D)
Forwarded or posted someone else's political commentary or writing?
-
(E)
Created and posted your own political audio or video recordings?
-
(F)
Forwarded or posted someone else's political audio or video recordings?
-
(G)
Created tags for news, information, or photos about politics or the election?
-
(H)
Signed an online petition?
-
(I)
Signed up online for any volunteer activities related to the campaign like helping to register voters or get people to the polls?
-
(A)
-
1.
-
SNS Use
-
1.
Have you ever created your own profile online that others can see, like on a social networking site like MySpace, Facebook, or LinkedIn.com? (No/yes)
-
2.
Please tell me if you ever use the internet to do any of the following things. Do you ever use the internet to use a social networking site like MySpace, Facebook, or LinkedIn.com? (Yes/yesterday, yes/not yesterday, no, recoded so higher values represent more use)
-
1.
-
Political SNS Use
Thinking about what you have done on social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace, have you
-
(A)
Gotten any campaign or candidate information on the sites?
-
(B)
Started or joined a political group or group supporting a cause on a social networking?
-
(C)
Discovered your friends' political interests or affiliations on the site?
-
(D)
Signed up as a “friend” of any candidates on a social networking site?
-
(A)
-
SES
-
1.
Income: The survey allowed for nine possible responses. We collapsed them into four categories based on quartiles. The first quartile is $0–30,000 annually. The second quartile is $30,001–50,000 annually. The third quartile is $50,001–100,000 annually. The fourth quartile is over $100,000 annually.
-
2.
Education: (a) less than high school, (b) high school graduate, (c) some college, (d) college graduate or more
-
1.
-
Political interest
How much thought have you given to the presidential election this year? Quite a lot, some, little, and none were the response options (recoded so higher values represent more attentiveness)
-
Age
18–30, 31–40, 41–50, 51–60, and 61–98
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gainous, J., Marlowe, A.D. & Wagner, K.M. Traditional Cleavages or a New World: Does Online Social Networking Bridge the Political Participation Divide?. Int J Polit Cult Soc 26, 145–158 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-013-9130-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-013-9130-2