Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structuring Cooperative Learning for Motivation and Conceptual Change in the Concepts of Mixtures

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of structuring cooperative learning based on conceptual change approach on grade 9 students’ understanding the concepts of mixtures and their motivation, compared with traditional instruction. Among six classes of a high school, two of them were randomly assigned to cooperative learning group where students were instructed by Cooperative Learning based on Conceptual Change (CLCC), the other two classes were randomly assigned to traditional learning group where students were instructed by Cooperative Learning based on Conceptual Change without well-structuring the basics of cooperative learning (CLCC(−)), and the remaining two classes were randomly assigned to control group where students were instructed by Traditional Instruction (TI). Mixtures Concept Test (MCT), motivation section of Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) except goal orientation sub-scales, and Achievement Goal Questionnaire (AGQ) were assigned to the sampled students before treatments are commenced as pretests and after treatments are completed as post-tests. According to post-test scores, there were statistically significant mean differences among the groups exposed to variations of cooperative learning based on conceptual change and traditional instruction with respect to students’ understanding the concepts of mixtures and their motivation. Results drawn upon this study revealed specifically that students exposed to CLCC had better understanding and lower alternative conceptions about the concepts of mixtures, perceived contents related to chemistry more valuable, felt greater control over their own learning, dealt better with sense of worry and emotionality during tests, adapted performance avoidance goals less, and mastery approach goals more than students instructed by CLCC(−) and TI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W. & Marek, E. A. (1992). Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M. & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, Z. & Mahmood, N. (2010). Effects of cooperative learning vs. traditional instruction on prospective teachers’ learning experience and achievement. Ankara University Journal of Educational Sciences, 43(1), 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashman, A. F. & Gillies, R. M. (1997). Children’s cooperative behavior and interactions in trained and untrained work groups in regular classrooms. Journal of School Psychology, 35(3), 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behfar, K. J., Mannix, E. A., Peterson, R. S. & Trochim, W. M. (2010). Conflict in small groups: The meaning and consequences of process conflict. Small Group Research, 42(2), 127–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertucci, A., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Conte, S. (2011). The effects of task and resource interdependence on achievement and social support: An exploratory study of Italian children. The Journal of Psychology, 145(4), 343–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertucci, A., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Conte, S. (2012). Influence of group processing on achievement and perception of social and academic support in elementary inexperienced cooperative learning groups. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(5), 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchs, C., Gilles, I., Dutrévis, M. & Butera, F. (2011). Pressure to cooperate: Is positive reward interdependence really needed in cooperative learning? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çalık, M. (2006). Bütünleştirici öğrenme kuramına göre lise 1 çözeltiler konusunda materyal geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey

  • Carter-Cohn, K. (1993). Can a photograph have a misconception? In J. Novak (Ed.), In The Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, NY

  • Dörnyei, Z. (1997). Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: Group dynamics and motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra, D. I., Boyle, C. F. & Monarch, I. A. (1992). Studying conceptual change in learning physics. Science Education, 76(6), 615–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J. V. & Erickson, G. L. (1996). Chemistry students’ conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography. Science Education, 80(2), 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenezer, J. V. & Gaskell, P. J. (1995). Relational conceptual change in solution chemistry. Science Education, 79(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J. & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

  • Gay, L. R. & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

  • George, D. & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 10.0 update. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R. M. (2006). Teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviors during cooperative and small-group learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R. M. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students’ behaviors, discourse and learning during a science-based learning activity. School Psychology International, 29, 328–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R. M. & Ashman, A. F. (1996). Teaching collaborative skills to primary school children in classroom-based work groups. Learning and Instruction, 6, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, M. G. & Hewson, P. W. (1983). Effect of instruction using students’ prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 731–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning: The teacher’s role. In R. M. Gillies, A. Ashman & J. Terwel (Eds.), The teachers’ role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom (pp. 9–36). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. (2009). Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., Stanne, M. & Garibaldi, A. (1990). The impact of leader and member group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, W. (2007). Cooperative learning in the classroom: Putting it into practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education (2004). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programı [Instructional program of elementary scince and technology lesson] Ankara, Turkey.

  • Ministry of National Education (2007). Ortaöğretim 9. sınıf kimya dersi öğretim programı [Instructional program of secondary 9th grade chemistry lesson] Ankara, Turkey.

  • Nam, C. W. & Zellner, R. D. (2011). The relative effects of positive interdependence and group processing on student achievement and attitude in online cooperative learning. Computers and Education, 56, 680–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. J. & Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children’s conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou, G. (2002). Helping students distinguish between mixtures and chemical compounds. Science Activities, 39(2), 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1950). Psychology of intelligence. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pınarbaşı, T. & Canpolat, N. (2003). Students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(11), 1328–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W. & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcίa, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, M. J. (2000). Using particulate drawings to determine and improve students’ conceptions of pure substances and mixtures. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(6), 762–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (2000). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

  • Şenler, B. & Sungur, S. (2007). Parental influences on students’ self-concept, task value beliefs, and achievement in science. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 106–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (2009). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Sungur, S. (2004). An implementation of problem based learning in high school biology courses. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  • Taber, K. S. (2001). Constructing chemical concepts in the classroom?: Using research to inform practice. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2(1), 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taştan, Ö. (2009). Effect of cooperative learning based on conceptual change conditions on motivation and understanding of reaction rate. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  • Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22(3), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tüysüz, C. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and assess students’ understanding in chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay, 4(6), 626–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L. & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of academic and self-regulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valanides, N. (2000a). Primary student teachers’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter and its transformations during dissolving. Research and Practice in Europe, 1(2), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valanides, N. (2000b). Primary student teachers’ understanding of the process and effects of distillation. Research and Practice in Europe, 1(3), 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1997). Assessing students in small collaborative groups. Theory Into Practice, 36(4), 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey

    Hatice Belge Can

  2. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

    Yezdan Boz

Authors
  1. Hatice Belge Can
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yezdan Boz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hatice Belge Can.

Additional information

This paper is mainly based on the unpublished doctoral dissertation of the first author.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM Appendix 1

(DOCX 20 kb)

ESM Appendix 2

(DOCX 17 kb)

ESM Appendix 3

(DOCX 47 kb)

ESM Appendix 4

(DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Belge Can, H., Boz, Y. Structuring Cooperative Learning for Motivation and Conceptual Change in the Concepts of Mixtures. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 635–657 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9602-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9602-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation