Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

LONG LIVE TRADITIONAL TEXTBOOK PROBLEMS!?—CONSTRAINTS ON FACULTY USE OF RESEARCH-BASED PROBLEMS IN INTRODUCTORY COURSES

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Though many research-based problem types have been shown effective in promoting students’ conceptual understanding and scientific abilities, the extent of their use in actual classrooms remains unclear. We interviewed and surveyed 16 physics and engineering faculty members at a large US Midwest research university to investigate how university instructors value and use different types of problems in teaching their introductory courses. Most of these instructors valued traditional textbook problems as a useful building block and used them frequently. They also valued non-traditional problems but seldom used them in their introductory courses. The divergence between value and use in part is due to limited resources and experience, time constraints, student reactions, and personal preferences. It is, however, also due to the fact that the beliefs held by some instructors regarding the nature of problem solving deviate from commonly accepted views in educational research. Although on average instructors were hesitant to reduce more than 20 % of course content for research-based materials, they showed great interest in collaborating with educational researchers at a more personal level to increase the use of non-traditional problems in teaching. Our study indicates that instructors need not only research-based problems suitable for their introductory classes, but also assistance in how to effectively implement these problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addy, T. M. & Blanchard, M. R. (2010). The problem with reform from the bottom up: Instructional practices and teacher beliefs of graduate teaching assistants following a reform-minded university teacher certificate programme. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1045–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelov, M. A., Friedman, M. B. & Renshaw, A. A. (1999). Introducing engineering design into the first year curriculum. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, 1999. FIE’99. 29th Annual.

  • Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K. M., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., et al (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323(5914), 586–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, C., Gunstone, R. F. & Fensham, P. (2003). Quality learning of physics: Conceptions held by high school and university teachers. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 245–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronzino, J. D., Ahlgren, D. J., Chung, C.-L., Mertens, J. D. & Palladino, J. L. (1994). Design and teamwork: A must for freshmen. IEEE Transactions on Education, 37(2), 184–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dancy, M. & Henderson, C. (2007). Framework for articulating instructional practices and conceptions. Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 3(1), 010103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancy, M. & Henderson, C. (2009). Pedagogical practices of physics faculty. Paper presented at the 2009 Physics Education Research Conference, Ann Arbor, MI.

  • Ding, L., Reay, N. W., Lee, A., & Bao, L. (2011). Exploring the role of conceptual scaffolding in solving synthesis problems. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(020109), 1–11.10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020109

  • Ding, L., Reay, N. W., Heckler, A. & Bao, L. (2010). Sustained effects of solving conceptually scaffolded synthesis problems. 2010 Physics Education Research Conference. AIP Conference Proceedings, (1289), 133–136. doi:10.1063./1.3515179.

  • Ding, L., Reay, N. W., Lee, A. & Bao, L. (2009). Using conceptual scaffolding to foster effective problem solving. 2009 Physics Education Research Conference. AIP Conference Proceedings, (1179), 129–132. doi:10.1063/1.3266695.

  • Etkina, E., Murthy, S. & Zou, X. (2006a). Using introductory labs to engage students in experimental design. American Journal of Physics, 74(11), 979–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etkina, E., Van Heuvelen, A., White-Brahmia, S., Brookes, D. T., Gentile, M., Murthy, S., et al (2006b). Scientific abilities and their assessment. Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 2(2), 020103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R. M., Satterly, D., Gil Perez, D. & Martinez-Torregrosa, J. (1990). Turning exercises into problems: An experimental study with teachers in training. International Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerace, W. J. & Beatty, I. D. (2005). Teaching vs. learning: Changing perspectives on problem solving in physics instruction. Paper presented at the 9th Common Conference of the Cyprus Physics Association and Greek Physics Association.

  • Hall, V. L. & Cendes, Z. J. (1993). Introducing real world design problems into the undergraduate electromagnetic curriculum. IEEE Transactions on Education, 36(2), 279–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, P. & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 637–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, P., Keith, R. & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 627–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C. (2005). The challenges of instructional change under the best of circumstances: A case study of one college physics instructor. American Journal of Physics, 73(8), 778–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C. & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C. & Dancy, M. H. (2008). Physics faculty and educational researchers: Divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Physics, 76(1), 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C. & Dancy, M. H. (2009). The impact of physics education research on the teaching of introductory quantitative physics. Paper presented at the 2009 Physics Education Research Conference, Ann Arbor, MI.

  • Henderson, C., Yerushalmi, E., Kuo, V. H., Heller, K. & Heller, P. (2007). Physics faculty beliefs and values about the teaching and learning of problem solving. II. Procedures for measurement and analysis. Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C., Yerushalmi, E., Kuo, V. H., Heller, P. & Heller, K. (2004). Grading student problem solutions: The challenge of sending a consistent message. American Journal of Physics, 72(2), 164–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janesick, V. J. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209–219). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. & Hung, W. (2006). Learning to troubleshoot: A new theory-based design architecture. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 77–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. & Hung, W. (2008). All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2), 6–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., Strobel, J. & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. & Pak, S.-J. (2002). Students do not overcome conceptual difficulties after solving 1000 traditional problems. American Journal of Physics, 70(7), 759–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, D. P. (1982). Fill-in problems. Journal of College Science Teaching, 12, 104–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, D. P. (1987). Ranking tasks: A new type of test item. Journal of College Science Teaching, 16, 510–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, D. P. (1994). Research on problem solving: Physics. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 327–354). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L. C. (1993). Guest comment: How we teach and how students learn—A mismatch? American Journal of Physics, 61(4), 295–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. S. (1960). It is important to know what questions to ask. American Journal of Physics, 28(1), 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, C. A., Atman, C. & Shuman, L. J. (1999). Freshman engineers’ performance when solving design problems. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42(4), 281–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petcovic, H. L., Fynewever, H., Henderson, C., Mutambuki, J. M. & Barney, J. A. (2012). Faculty grading of quantitative problems: A mismatch between values and practice. Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9268-8.

  • Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching physics with the physics suite. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabella, M. S. & Redish, E. F. (2007). Knowledge organization and activation in physics problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 75(11), 1017–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. B. (1997). New and effective techniques in physics courses for non-science majors and the training of pre-college teachers. In AIP conference proceedings, vol. 399 (pp. 113–132). American Institute of Physics.

  • Southerland, S. A., Gess-Newsome, J. & Johnston, A. (2003). Portraying science in the classroom: The manifestation of scientists’ beliefs in classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 669–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunal, D. W., Hodges, J., Sunal, C. S., Whitaker, K. K., Freeman, L. M., Edwards, L., et al (2001). Teaching science in higher education: Faculty professional development and barriers to change. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 246–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunal, D. W., Sunal, C. S., Mason, C. & Zollman, D. A. (2007). Undergraduate reform in science courses: A review of the research literature. National Study of Education in Undergraduate Science.

  • Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., Van Werven, H. I. & Dekkers, H. (1997). Teachers’ craft knolwedge and curriculum innovation in higher engineering education. Higher Education, 34(1), 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Heuvelen, A. (1996). Experiment problems for mechanics. The Physics Teacher, 33(3), 176–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Heuvelen, A. & Maloney, D. P. (1999). Playing physics jeopardy. American Journal of Physics, 67(3), 252–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wlodarsky, R. (2005). The professoriate: Transforming teaching practices through critical reflection and dialogue. Teaching & Learning, 19(3), 156–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmi, E., Henderson, C., Heller, K., Heller, P. & Kuo, V. H. (2007). Physics faculty beliefs and values about the teaching and learning of problem solving. I. Mapping the common core. Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmi, E. & Magen, E. (2006). Same old problem, new name? Alerting students to the nature of problem solving process. Physics Education, 41(2), 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Teaching and Learning, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Lin Ding

Authors
  1. Lin Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Ding.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ding, L. LONG LIVE TRADITIONAL TEXTBOOK PROBLEMS!?—CONSTRAINTS ON FACULTY USE OF RESEARCH-BASED PROBLEMS IN INTRODUCTORY COURSES. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 12, 123–144 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9400-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9400-5

Key words

Search

Navigation