ABSTRACT
Reform efforts in science education have aimed at fostering scientific literacy by helping learners meaningfully engage in scientific practices to make sense of the world. In this paper, we report on our second year of unit implementation that has investigated 34 fifth grade students’ (10-year-olds) learning about evaporation and condensation through scientific modeling in the USA. We discuss how students who engaged in modeling constructed explanations of evaporation and condensation, considered empirical evidence when constructing their models, and used models to predict other phenomena. We constructed a coding scheme based on an iterative process and qualitatively analyzed assessment items, interview questions, and classroom videos in order to find out what students learned through modeling. The results of our empirical work indicate that students made significant progress in constructing models that convey unobservable characteristics of molecular mechanisms or processes. They also made progress in using models as tools consistent with evidence and using models to predict other phenomena, but the progress was to a less sophisticated level. We theorize that some aspects of modeling practice are more aligned with typical school norms and practices than others—enabling some aspects to be more readily appropriated than others. We conclude the manuscript with ways to capitalize on the successes of this practice and to address challenges that could be taken to help improve students’ understanding of science through engagement in scientific modeling.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., et al (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419.
Acher, A., Arcà, M. & Sanmartí, N. (2007). Modeling as a teaching learning process for understanding materials: A case study in primary education. Science Education, 91(3), 398–418.
Baek, H., Schwarz, C., Chen, J., Hokayem, H. & Zhan, L. (2011). Engaging elementary students in scientific modeling: The MoDeLS 5th grade approach and findings. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), Dynamic modeling: Cognitive tool for scientific enquiry. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Bamberger, Y. & Davis, E. (2011). Middle school science students’ scientific modeling performances across content areas and within a learning progression. International Journal of Science Education, iFirstArticle, 1–26.
Berland, L. K. & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55.
Buckley, B. (2000). Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 895–935.
Cartier, J. & Stewart, J. (2000). Teaching the nature of inquiry: Further developments in a High School Genetics program. Science Education, 9, 247–267.
Chen, J., Hokayem, H. & Schwarz, C. (2009). Investigating the relationship between scientific modeling and content knowledge: A study of 5th graders’ learning of evaporation and condensation through scientific modeling. Poster presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Garden Grove, CA.
Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Coll, R., France, B. & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models/and analogies in science education: Implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 183–198.
Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York: Routledge.
Gotwals, A. (2012). Learning progressions for multiple purposes. In A. Alonzo & A. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science (pp. 462–472). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
Halloun, I. (2006). Modeling theory in science education. Dordrecht, the Netherland: Springer.
Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432.
Johnson, P. (1998). Children’s understanding of changes of state involving the gas state. Evaporation and condensation below boiling point. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 695–709.
Johnson, S. & Stewart, J. (2002). Revising and assessing explanatory models in a high school genetics class. Science Education, 86, 463–480.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L. (2010). What kind of explanation is a model? In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 9–22). New York: Springer.
Miles, M. & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
National Research Council [NRC] (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Novick, S. & Nussbaum, J. (1978). Junior high school pupils’ understanding of the particular nature of matter: An interview study. Science Education, 62(3), 273–281.
Osborne, R. & Cosgrove, M. (1983). Children’s conceptions of the changes of the state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 825–838.
Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P. & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5–51.
Schwarz, C. & Gwekwere, Y. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K–8 science teaching. Science Education, 91(1), 158–186.
Schwarz, C., Reiser, B., Davis, B., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Scwhartz, Y., Hug, B. & Kraj-cik, J. (2009). Designing a learning progression of scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632–654.
Schwarz, C. & White, B. Y. (2005). Meta-modeling knowledge: Developing students’ understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165–205.
Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G. & Mamiala, T. (2002). Students’ understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357–368.
Tytler, R. (2000). A comparison of year 1 and year 6 students’ conceptions of evaporation and condensation: Dimensions of conceptual progression. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 447–467.
Van Driel, J. & Verloop, N. (2007). The change of science teachers’ personal knowledge about teaching models and modeling in the context of science education reform. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1819–1846.
Windschitl, M. & Thompson, J. (2006). Transcending simple forms of school science investigations: Can pre-service instruction foster teachers’ understandings of model-based inquiry? American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 783–835.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 54 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hokayem, H., Schwarz, C. ENGAGING FIFTH GRADERS IN SCIENTIFIC MODELING TO LEARN ABOUT EVAPORATION AND CONDENSATION. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 12, 49–72 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9395-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9395-3