ENGAGING FIFTH GRADERS IN SCIENTIFIC MODELING TO LEARN ABOUT EVAPORATION AND CONDENSATION
- 461 Downloads
Reform efforts in science education have aimed at fostering scientific literacy by helping learners meaningfully engage in scientific practices to make sense of the world. In this paper, we report on our second year of unit implementation that has investigated 34 fifth grade students’ (10-year-olds) learning about evaporation and condensation through scientific modeling in the USA. We discuss how students who engaged in modeling constructed explanations of evaporation and condensation, considered empirical evidence when constructing their models, and used models to predict other phenomena. We constructed a coding scheme based on an iterative process and qualitatively analyzed assessment items, interview questions, and classroom videos in order to find out what students learned through modeling. The results of our empirical work indicate that students made significant progress in constructing models that convey unobservable characteristics of molecular mechanisms or processes. They also made progress in using models as tools consistent with evidence and using models to predict other phenomena, but the progress was to a less sophisticated level. We theorize that some aspects of modeling practice are more aligned with typical school norms and practices than others—enabling some aspects to be more readily appropriated than others. We conclude the manuscript with ways to capitalize on the successes of this practice and to address challenges that could be taken to help improve students’ understanding of science through engagement in scientific modeling.
KEY WORDScondensation evaporation modeling scientific practice
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baek, H., Schwarz, C., Chen, J., Hokayem, H. & Zhan, L. (2011). Engaging elementary students in scientific modeling: The MoDeLS 5th grade approach and findings. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), Dynamic modeling: Cognitive tool for scientific enquiry. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Bamberger, Y. & Davis, E. (2011). Middle school science students’ scientific modeling performances across content areas and within a learning progression. International Journal of Science Education, iFirstArticle, 1–26.Google Scholar
- Chen, J., Hokayem, H. & Schwarz, C. (2009). Investigating the relationship between scientific modeling and content knowledge: A study of 5th graders’ learning of evaporation and condensation through scientific modeling. Poster presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Garden Grove, CA.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gotwals, A. (2012). Learning progressions for multiple purposes. In A. Alonzo & A. Gotwals (Eds.), Learning progressions in science (pp. 462–472). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar
- Halloun, I. (2006). Modeling theory in science education. Dordrecht, the Netherland: Springer.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- National Research Council [NRC] (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, C., Reiser, B., Davis, B., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Scwhartz, Y., Hug, B. & Kraj-cik, J. (2009). Designing a learning progression of scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar