Advertisement

Human Studies

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 19–31 | Cite as

Attunement in the Modern Age

  • Janko M. Lozar
Research Paper
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

This contribution starts from Max Scheler’s claim that modern philosophy holds two differing views on feelings. The first view, which Scheler attributes to René Descartes, presents them in their intentional role but rejects their independence; the other view, which Scheler attributes to Immanuel Kant, holds that they cannot be reduced to the rational part of the soul and thus affirms their independence, but deprives them of all cognitive powers. After considering both views, I discuss the views of Franz Brentano and Edmund Husserl. Husserl takes an ambivalent approach to attunement, which opens the possibility of understanding Martin Heidegger’s thought of fundamental attunement.

Keywords

Attunement Feeling Modern age Objectifying act Passive synthesis Phenomenology Representation 

References

  1. Brentano, F. (1874/1995). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. (L. L. McAlister, A. Rancurello & D. B. Terrell, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Coriando, P.-L. (2002). Affektenlehre und phänomenologie der stimmungen. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Descartes, R. (1641/1951). Meditations on first philosophy. (L. J. Lafleur, Trans.). New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  4. Descartes, R. (1649/1989). The passions of the soul. (S. Voss, Trans.). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Gillespie, M. A. (1996). Nihilism before Nietzsche. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, M. (1927/1962). Being and time. (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Heidegger, M. (1989/1999). Contributions to philosophy (From enowning). (P. Emad & K. Maly, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Husserl, E. (1901/2001). The shorter logical investigations. (M. A. E. Dummett, J. N. Findlay & D. Moran, Trans.). London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  9. Husserl, E. (1928/1964). Phenomenology of internal time-consciousness. (J. S. Churchill, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Husserl, E. (1931/1982). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. (D. Cairns, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Husserl, E. (1936/1970). The Crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. (D. Carr, Trans.). Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Husserl, E. (1970/2001). Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis: Lectures on transcendental logic. (A. J. Steinbock, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Kant, I. (1788/1922). Critique of practical reason. (F. M. Müller, Trans.). London: Macmillan & Co, Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. Kant, I. (1790/1914). Critique of judgement, (J. H. Bernard, Trans.). London: Macmillan & Co, Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. Kaufmann, P. (1992). Gemüt und Gefühl als Komplement der Vernunft. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit der Tradition und der phänomenologischen Ethik, besonders Max Schelers. (Disposition and feeling as complement of reason. Examination of tradition and phenomenological ethics, especially Max Scheler’s). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Levinas, E. (1930/1973). The theory of intuition in Husserl’s phenomenology. (A. Orianne, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Scheler, M. (1916/1973). Formalism in ethics and non-formal ethics of values: A new attempt toward the foundation of an ethical personalism. (M. S. Frings & R. L. FunkHalle, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, A. D. (2003a). Husserl and the Cartesian meditations. London: Taylor & Francis e-Library.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, J. A. (2003b). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. London: Sage House Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Faculty of ArtsLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations