How do first year students utilize different lecture resources?
One of the more noticeable changes to tertiary teaching over the past decade has been the widespread adoption of digital technologies, in particular eLearning platforms and lecture capture technology. However, much of the current knowledge of how students utilise these new technologies and their effect on traditional lecture attendance is simply derived from student surveys rather than comprehensive independent analyses. In this study, we use cluster analysis to identify common lecture resource utilisation patterns for students in four large first-year business subjects. While common usage patterns with respect to lecture attendance, video lecture recording access and download of lecture notes are identified across our subjects, the proportion of students within each of the utilisation clusters varies widely. Business statistics students are much more likely to either attend lectures or view video recordings compared to economics students, many of whom rely solely on the download of lecture notes. In order to gain insight into how student characteristics may affect these utilisation patterns, we develop a predictive model, quantifying the influences of prior academic performance, gender, age, distance from campus and international student status using statistical modelling. We find a strong role for students’ previous academic performance in explaining lecture resource utilisation patterns. Students’ commuting distance to campus is also established as a factor dissuading physical lecture attendance. Contrary to initial expectations, we also found that females and older students tend to rely more heavily on digital resources rather than lecture attendance. It is hoped that these findings can help first-year instructors and University administrators understand the heterogeneity of student lecture engagement patterns within the first-year experience.
KeywordsCluster analysis Lecture recordings Lecture attendance Learning analytics Student engagement
- Abeyasekera, S. (2003). Chapter 18: Multivariate methods for index construction. Household surveys in developing and transition countries: design, implementation and analysis. United Nations Statistics Division.Google Scholar
- Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2002). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In Proceedings of the 2002 Annual Meeting of The Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, queens university may 24-28, edited by Simmt, E., and B. Davis: 3-14.Google Scholar
- Bassili, J. N. (2008). Media richness and social norms in the choice to attend lectures or to watch them online. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(4), 453–475.Google Scholar
- Becker, W. E. (1997). Teaching economics to undergraduates. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1347–1373.Google Scholar
- Berenson, M., Levine, D., Szabat, K., O’Brien, M., Watson, J., & Jayne, N. (2015). Basic business statistics. Australia: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, June 23–26.Google Scholar
- Bos, N., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2016). Profiling student behaviour in a blended course: closing the gap between blended teaching and blended learning. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2016) - Volume 2, pp. 65–72.Google Scholar
- Brooks, C. (2014). Introductory econometrics for finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Cooke, M., Watson, B., Blacklock, M., Mansah, M., Howard, M., Johnston, A., Tower, M., & Murfield, J. (2012). Lecture capture: first year student nurses’ experiences of a web-based lecture technology. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(3), 14–21.Google Scholar
- Durdan, G. C., & Ellis, L. V. (1995). The effects of attendance on student learning in principles of economics. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 85(2), 343–346.Google Scholar
- Gendron, P., & Pieper, P. (2005). Does attendance matter? Evidence from an Ontario ITAL. Unpublished discussion paper, Humber Institute of Technology & Advanced Learning, Toronto http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.124.8735&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 2 May 2017.
- Gosper, M. V., McNeill, M. A., & Woo, K. (2010). Harnessing the power of technologies to manage collaborative e-learning projects in dispersed environments. Journal of Distance Education, 24(1), 167–186.Google Scholar
- Harley, D., Henke, J., Lawrence, S., McMartin, F., Maher, M., Gawlick, M., & Muller, P. (2003). Costs, culture, and complexity: an analysis of technology enhancements in a large lecture course at UC Berkeley.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46438019_Costs_Culture_and_Complexity_An_Analysis_of_Technology_Enhancements_in_a_Large_Lecture_Course_at_UC_Berkeley. Accessed 2 May 2017.
- Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.Google Scholar
- Pinder-Grover, T., Green, K. R., & Millunchick, J. M. (2011). The efficacy of screencasts to address the diverse academic needs of students in a large lecture course (pp. 1–28). Winter: Advances in Engineering Education.Google Scholar
- Prodanov, V. I. (2012). In-class lecture recording; What Lecture Capture has to Offer the Instructor. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6814/4ee94290cd23e6925b4f4379a3b08c00f0e8.pdf?_ga=1.11246388.1419539888.1472092167. Accessed 2 May 2017.
- Pye, G., Holt, D., Salzman, S., Bellucci, E., & Lombardi, L. (2015). Engaging diverse student audiences in contemporary blended learning environments in Australian higher business education: implications for design and practice. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 19, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ross, T. K., & Bell, P. D. (2007). “No significant difference” only on the surface. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4(7), 3–13.Google Scholar
- Soong, S. K. A., Chan, L. C. Cheers, C.,& Hu, C. (2006). Impact of video recorded lectures among students. Paper presented at the 23rd annual ascilite conference, Sydney, December 3.Google Scholar
- von Konsky, B. R., Ivins, J., & Gribble, S. J. (2009). Lecture attendance and web based lecture technologies: a comparison of student perceptions and usage patterns. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 581–595.Google Scholar
- Williams, J., & Fardon, M. (2007). Perpetual connectivity: lecture recordings and portable media players. Paper presented to the ASCILITE conference, Singapore, December 2-5.Google Scholar
- Young, J. R. (2008). The lectures are recorded, so why go to class? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(36), A1.Google Scholar
- Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: implications for higher education. JISC CETIS. March 2013 http://publications.cetis.org.uk/2013/667.