Advertisement

Higher Education

, Volume 66, Issue 4, pp 391–407 | Cite as

Quality assessment of undergraduate education in China: impact on different universities

  • Shuiyun Liu
Article

Abstract

This research analyzes the scheme proposed to assess the quality of higher education institutions in China, namely, the Quality Assessment of Undergraduate Education (QAUE) scheme. This article aims to determine the impact of the QAUE on universities and explore the reasons that intended effects have or have not been generated in the evaluated universities by conducting case studies of three Chinese universities with different statuses. The empirical studies show the effects on the various dimensions of quality provisions at different universities were not the same. It was found that the impact of the QAUE was not a linear consequence of policy implementation, but the result of an interaction between the external quality assessment scheme and the evaluated universities. Quality assessment is regarded to be an external force to cause universities to change. This empirical study of the QAUE shows that changes will only take place when the external force is integrated with the evaluated universities’ internal motivation and capacity.

Keywords

QAUE Quality assessment University changes External force Operational mode Normative mode 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the support of National Social Science Fund of China (Project CIA120142) and Centenary Scholarship from Institute of Education, University of London, UK.

References

  1. Barnetson, B., & Cutright, M. (2000). Performance indicators as conceptual technologies. Higher Education, 40(3), 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becher, T., & Kogan, M. (1992). Process and Structure in Higher Education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Brennan, J., & Shah, T. (2000). Managing quality in higher education: An international perspective on institutional assessment and change. Buckingham: OECD, SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, R. (2004). Quality assurance in higher education: The UK experience since 1992. London: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng, M. (2011). ‘Transforming the learner’ versus ‘passing the exam’: Understanding the gap between academic and student definitions of quality. Quality in Higher Education, 17(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Csizmadia, T., Enders, J., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2008). Quality management in Hungarian higher education: Organisational responses to governmental policy. Higher Education, 56(4), 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniel, J. (2004). Incentives and accountability: Instruments of change in higher education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 16(1), 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haapakorpi, A. (2011). Quality assurance processes in Finnish universities: Direct and indirect outcomes and organisational conditions. Quality in Higher Education, 17(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harvey, L. (2001). Defining and measuring employability. Quality in Higher Education, 7(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. HEEC (2012). Information collected on the organisation’s website. http://www.pgzx.edu.cn/index.jsp. Assessed 10 April 2012 (in Chinese).
  11. Hodson, P., & Thomas, H. (2003). Quality assurance in higher education: Fit for the new millennium or simply year 2000 compliant? Higher Education, 45(3), 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Houston, D. (2010). Achievements and consequences of two decades of quality assurance in higher education: A personal view from the edge. Quality in Higher Education, 16(2), 177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kogan, M., & Hanney, S. (2000). Reforming higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  14. Kondakci, Y., & Van den Broeck, H. (2009). Institutional imperatives versus emergent dynamics: A case study on continuous change in higher education. Higher Education, 58(4), 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu, S. (2009). Study of the impact of the quality assessment of undergraduate education policy in China: Students’ perceptions. INQAAHE Biannual Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE.Google Scholar
  16. Liu, X. (2011). Exploration on individuality education in higher education institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 32(3), 1–9. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  17. Ma, T. (2008). On the teaching responsibility of university faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 29(5), 20–25. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  18. Maassen, P. A. M., & Stensaker, B. (2003). Interpretations of self-regulation: The changing state-higher education relationship in Europe. In R. Begg (Ed.), The dialogue between higher education research and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. Malau-Aduli, B., Zimitat, C., & Malau-Aduli, A. (2011). Quality assured assessment processes: Evaluating staff response to change. Higher Education Management and Policy, 23(6), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MOE. (2004). Project of quality assessment of undergraduate education. Beijing: Ministry of Education. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  21. MOE. (2010). Chinese education yearbook. Beijing: People’s Education Press. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  22. Morley, L. (2003). Quality and power in higher education. Berkshire: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Olsen, J. P. (2005). The institutional dynamics of the European University. Arena. Working Paper, 15. Arena: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  24. Rebora, G., & Turri, M. (2011). Critical factors in the use of evaluation in Italian universities. Higher Education, 61(5), 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reed, M. I., Meek, L. V., & Jones, G. A. (2002). Introduction. In A. Amaral, G. A. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  26. Rowan, B. (2006). The new institutionalism and the study of educational organisations: Changing ideas for changing times. In H. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  27. Shin, J. (2010). Impacts of performance-based accountability on institutional performance in the US. Higher Education, 60(1), 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stensaker, B. (2003). Trance, transparency and transformation: The impact of external quality monitoring on higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 9(2), 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stensaker, B. (2006). Governmental policy, organisational ideals, and institutional adaptation in Norwegian higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stensaker, B. (2008). Outcomes of quality assurance: A discussion of knowledge, methodology and validity. Quality in Higher Education, 14(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Støren, L., & Aamodt, P. (2010). The quality of higher education and employability of graduates. Quality in Higher Education, 16(3), 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Trow, M. (1996). Trust, markets and accountability in higher education: A comparative perspective. Higher Education Policy, 9(4), 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Turri, M., Rebora, G., & Huisman, J. (2007). The effects of quality assurance in universities: Empirical evidence from three cases. In L. Purser, L. Wilson, & E. Froment (Eds.), Introducing Bologna objectives and tools (pp. 1–28). Stuttgart: Raabe.Google Scholar
  35. Vroeijenstijn, A. I. (1995). Improvement and accountability: Navigating between Scylla and Charybdis. In Higher education policy series, 30. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  36. Wang, Y., & Liu, B. (2009). The thirty-year Chinese educational reforms: Higher education. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  37. Yin, R. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Zhong, B., Zhou, H., Liu, Z., & Wei, H. (2009). Summarise the experiences and lessons, study the contexts and trends, and reform the quality assessment: Exploring the principal problems with the first round of the quality assessment of undergraduate education I. China Higher Education, 1, 33–36. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  39. Zhou, X. (2010). From government accountability to social accountability: Connotation, types and change of Chinese university accountability. Journal of Higher Education, 31(1), 34–40. (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations