Higher Education

, Volume 62, Issue 4, pp 413–430 | Cite as

The determinants of international student mobility flows: an empirical study on the Erasmus programme

  • Carlos Rodríguez González
  • Ricardo Bustillo Mesanza
  • Petr Mariel


The Erasmus Programme for higher education students is supposed to play an important socio-economic role within Europe. Erasmus student mobility flows have reached a relevant level of two million since 1987, boosted in recent years by the enlargement of the programme to eastern countries. Thereafter, it seems that flows have staggered. In this context, the article analyses the determinants of Erasmus student mobility establishing relevant hypotheses, which arise from the migration theory and gravity models. A panel data set of bilateral flows for all the participating countries has been used in order to test the factors influencing these student flows. Country size, cost of living, distance, educational background, university quality, the host country language and climate are all found to be significant determinants. Results also reveal that there are other determinants, like a country’s characteristics and time effects, which can affect mobility flows. Based on these findings, some general recommendations are put forward to enhance these flows.


Gravity models Erasmus student mobility Erasmus programme International student mobility Migration 



The authors are grateful for financial support from the Department of Education of the Basque Government through grant IT-334-07 (UPV/EHU Econometrics Research Group) and from the Spanish Ministerio de Educación and FEDER (SEJ2007-61362).


  1. Almeida, L. M., Goncalves, W., & Mirian, B. (2001). A methodology to incorporate behavioral aspects in trip-distribution models with an application to estimate student flow. Environment and Planning A, 33(6), 1125–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashby, N. J. (2007). Economic freedom and migration flows between US states. Southern Economic Journal, 73(3), 677–697.Google Scholar
  3. Bierens, H. J., & Kontuly, T. (2008). Testing the regional restructuring hypothesis in Western Germany. Environment and Planning A, 40(7), 1713–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bracht, O., Engel, C., Janson, K., Over, A., Schomburg, A., & Teichler, U. (2006). The professional value of Erasmus mobility. Kassel, Germany: International Centre for Higher Education Research, University of Kassel.Google Scholar
  5. Breitenfellner, A., Crespo-Cuaresma, J., Mooslechner, P., & Ritzberger-Grunwald, D. (2008). The impact of EU enlargement in 2004 and 2007 on FDI and migration flows gravity analysis of factor mobility. Monetary Policy and the Economy, 2, 101–120.Google Scholar
  6. Cseres-Gergely, Z. (2004). County to county migration and labour market conditions in Hungary between 1994 and 2002. Zeitschrift fur ArbeitsmarktForschung/Journal for Labour Market Research, 37(4), 425–436.Google Scholar
  7. Devillanova, C., & Garcia-Fontes, W. (2004). Migration across Spanish provinces: Evidence from the social security records (1978–1992). Investigaciones Economicas, 28(3), 461–487.Google Scholar
  8. EENEE, (2007). European expert network on economics of education. www.education-economics.org. Eurostudent report (2005–2008), http://www.eurostudent.eu/.
  9. Erasmus-LLP. (2007–2013). EU lifelong learning programme 2007–2013. http://ec.europa.eu/education.
  10. European Commission. (2000). Survey into the socio-economic background of Erasmus students. Directorate general for education and culture. http://ec.europa.eu/education/erasmus/doc/publ/survey_en.pdf.
  11. Eurostudent (2009) (EUROSTUDENT III 2005–2008): Social and economic conditions of student life in Europe. European Commission, Eurostat.Google Scholar
  12. Findlay, A., King, R., Stam, A., & Ruiz-Gelices, E. (2006). The changing geographies of UK students studying and working abroad. European Urban and Regional Studies, 13(4), 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frankel, J., & Rose, A. (2002). An estimate of the effects of common currencies on trade and income. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 437–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karemera, D., Iwuagwu, V., & Davis, B. (2000). A gravity model analysis of international migration to North America. Applied Economics, 32(13), 1745–1755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. King, R., & Ruiz-Gelices, E. (2003). International student migration and the European ‘Year Abroad’: Effects on European identity and subsequent migration behaviour. International Journal of Population Geography, 9(3), 229–252. May/June 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, M., & Bray, M. (2007). Cross border flows of Students for higher education: Push-pull factors and motivations of mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong and Macau. Higher Education, 53, 791–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu, D., & Wang, J. (2008). The determinants of international student mobility: An empirical study on US data. Högskolan Dalarna: Master Thesis.Google Scholar
  18. Maringe, F., & Carter, S. (2007). International students’ motivations for studying in UK HE: Insights into the choice and decision making of African students. International Journal of Educational Marketing, 21(6), 459–475.Google Scholar
  19. Mazzarol, T. W., & Soutar, G. N. (2002). Push-pull factors influencing international student destination choice. The International Journal of Education Management, 16, 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mcmahon, M. E. (1992). Higher education in a world market: A historical look at the global context of international study. Higher Education, 24(4), 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Naidoo, V. (2007). Research on the flow of international students to UK universities: Determinants and implications. Journal of Research in International Education, 6(3), 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parey, M., & Waldinger, F. (2007). Studying abroad and the effect on international labour market mobility. London: Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  23. Poston, D. L., Jr., & Zhang, L. (2008). Ecological analyses of permanent and temporary migration streams in China in the 1990s. Population Research and Policy Review, 27(6), 689–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sá, C., Florax, R. J. G. M., & Rietveld, P. (2004). Determinants of the regional demand for higher education in the Netherlands: A gravity model approach. Regional Studies, 38(4), 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shen, J. (1999). Modelling regional migration in China: Estimation and decomposition. Environment and Planning A, 31(7), 1223–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Souto Otero, M., & McCoshan, A. (2006). Survey of the socio-economic background of Erasmus students. DG EAC 01/05. Final Report to the European Commission, Birmingham.Google Scholar
  27. Teichler, U. (2007). International dimensions of higher education and graduate employment, REFLEX report. REFLEX, The flexible professional in the knowledge society. New demands on higher, project supported by the VI framework programme of the EU, 199–220.Google Scholar
  28. Warin, T., & Svaton, P. (2008). European migration: Welfare migration or economic migration? Global Economy Journal, 8(3), 1–30.Google Scholar
  29. White, H. (1980). Heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix astimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wolf, D., Freedman, V., & Soldo, B. (1997). The division of family labor: Care for elderly parents. Journal of Gerontology, 52B, 102–109.Google Scholar
  31. Wolpert, J. (1965). Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate. Papers of Regional Science Association, 15, (pp. 159–169). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Rodríguez González
    • 1
  • Ricardo Bustillo Mesanza
    • 1
  • Petr Mariel
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied Economics VUniversity of the Basque CountryBilbaoSpain
  2. 2.Department of Applied Economics IIIUniversity of the Basque CountryBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations