Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Managing differentiation of higher education system in Japan: connecting excellence and diversity

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents recent reform processes in Japanese higher education, concerning the tensions emerging within the system regarding ‘excellence’ and ‘diversity’. The article particularly focuses on how Japanese universities have reacted to the recent ‘competition’ and ‘differentiation’ policy promoted by the government, drawing on recent survey results conducted with academic managers at Japanese universities. It is interesting to examine the case of Japan, a historically diversified and differentiated national system, which has been changing rapidly with recent national ‘top-down’ policy reforms, followed by more recent and new bottom-up institutional initiatives. The study shows that universities are trying to achieve excellence, fulfilling different functions at the same time, aspiring to be excellent in teaching, research and social contribution without having institutional capacity to meet these expectations. Appropriate internal governance and external mediation mechanisms need to be created at the institutional level to manage diversification of the higher education system as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As of 2008, there are 589 private universities, 86 national universities and 90 local public (municipal and prefectural) universities with degree awarding power (MEXT 2008).

  2. Furthermore, several for-profit universities have recently been approved on a trial basis by the government. For-profit universities mainly target the adult professional education market, such as legal professionals, business executives, and creative industry professionals.

  3. Trow (1974, 2006) illustrates the transformation of higher education systems in three stages: elite, mass and universal. Higher education in Japan today is facing financial as well as demographic constraints, which may be indicative of a ‘post-massification’ stage. Arimoto (1996) introduced the concept of ‘post-massification stage’ to explain the specific transformation from a mass to universal higher education system in Japan.

  4. The 18-year-population has fallen from 2.05 million in 1992 to 1.24 million in 2008.

  5. These include legal studies, accounting, medical studies, public policy, intellectual property management, technology management, public health and teachers’ training.

  6. In Japanese universities, faculties constitute the basic academic units offering undergraduate courses, which consist generally of several departments.

  7. Operating grants amount to 1.2 trillion yen; subsidies for capital expenditure amount to 1 trillion yen.

  8. Three major changes were proposed by the Toyama Plan: First, the reorganisation of national universities, including the merger of some institutions; second, the introduction of putative business methods to national universities through a process of ‘incorporation’, and third, the introduction of competitive mechanisms into the university sector, including national, public and private universities (Yamamoto 2004).

  9. See Currie (2002) and Eades (2005) for details of evaluation and criteria.

  10. http://www.jsps.go.jp/english/e-21coe/index.html. Accessed 30 September 2007. Each programme would receive an average of around 100 million yen per year for 5 years (the annual budget ranged from 26 to 330 million yen), with the budget for the final 3 years dependent on an interim progress review after 2 years (Eades 2005).

  11. In total, 63 research bases (32 research bases from former imperial universities) from 28 universities (21 national, 4 private and 3 local public universities) have been selected. http://www.jsps.go.jp/j-globalcoe/data/shinsa/sinsakekka.pdf. Accessed 30 September 2007.

  12. ‘World Premier International Research Center (WPI) Initiative’ http://www.mext.go.jp/english/wpi/index.htm. Accessed 30 September 2007.

  13. For example, the number of peer reviewers per project funded by Japanese Grants in Aid is only 0.05, while with the US NSF, the number is 6.1. (Takeuchi, 2007).

  14. University of Tsukuba is a research intensive NUC, established in the 1970s and located in Tsukuba Science City, near Tokyo.

  15. Commissioned research includes contracted research by the state and local authorities, and certain research programmes contracted by Japan Science and Technology Agency.

  16. Comments by the Head of NUC support unit, MEXT, recorded in Ronza (2006, July; p. 207).

  17. In the survey, we did not specify any time scale to fulfil these roles.

References

  • Akabayashi, H., & Naoi, M. (2004). Why is there no Harvard among Japanese private Universities? http://repec.org/esFEAM04/up.30196.1080739062.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2007.

  • Altbach, P. G. (2003). The costs and benefits of world-class Universities. International Higher Education, 33(Fall), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amano, I. (2008). Future of national Universities and their incorporation: Between independence and inequality. Tokyo: Toshindo. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arimoto, A. (1996). The academic profession in Japan. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), The international academic profession (pp. 149–190). Princeton, New Jersey: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asonuma, A. (2002). Globalisation and higher education reforms: The Japanese case. Higher Education, 43, 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. P. (2007). Mass higher education and the super research University. International Higher Education, 49(Fall), 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balderston, F. (1995). Managing today’s University: Strategies for viability, change and excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (2004). The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back. New Directions for Higher Education, 2004(127), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. (2005). Organizing higher education in the knowledge society. Higher Education, 49(1), 31–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Central Council for Education (CCE). (2005). The future of higher education in Japan. Tokyo: MEXT. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, E. E., & Tierney, W. G. (1988). Collegiate culture and leadership strategies. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (2001). The entrepreneurial University: New foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Higher Education Management, 13(2), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, W. (1998). The service University in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 35(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, W. (2002). Japan’s top 30 universities. International Higher Education, 26, 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doi, R. (2007). Structural analysis of Universities’ competitive environment for teaching and research (in Japanese). RIETI Policy Discussion Paper Series 07-P-003. http://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/pdp/07p003.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2007.

  • Eades, J. (2005). The Japanese 21st center of excellence program: Internationalisation in action? In J. S. Eades, R. Goodman, & Y. Hada (Eds.), The ‘big bang’ in Japanese higher education: The 2004 reforms and the dynamics of change. Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (1993). University–industry research links in Japan. Policy Science, 26(4), 361–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, M. (2005). Higher education reform in Japan and Germany: Are we heading for the same direction? CRDHE Working Paper Vol. 1 Higher Education Reform in Japan and Germany: Transformation of State–University relation. http://www.he.u-tokyo.ac.jp/pdf/workingpaper200505.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2007.

  • Kezar, A. (2004). What is more important to effective governance: Relationships, trust, and leadership, or structures and formal processes? New Directions for Higher Education, 2004(127), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, F. (2005). Constructing advantage in the knowledge society—Roles of Universities reconsidered: The case of Japan. Higher Education Management and Policy, 17(1), 45–62. Paris, OECD.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, F. (2008). (Post) Mass higher education and Japanese elite Universities. In T. Tapper (Ed.), Structuring mass higher education; the role of elite institutions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, F. (2009). University–industry links and regional development in Japan: Connecting excellence and relevance? Science, Technology and Society, 14(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneller, R. (2007). Prospective and retrospective evaluation systems in context: Insights from Japan. In R. Whitley & J. Gäser (Eds.), The changing governance of the sciences (pp. 51–73). Netherland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEXT. (2006). The achievements of the 21st century center of excellence program. http://www.jsps.go.jp/j-21coe/07_sonota/index.html. Retrieved 14 June 2009.

  • MEXT. (2008). Gakko kihon chosa. http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/toukei/001/08072901/index.htm. Accessed 20 Aug 2008.

  • Oba, J. (2005). The incorporation of national universities in Japan: Initial reactions of the new national university corporations. Higher Education Management and Policy, 17(2), 105–125. Paris, OECD.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oba, J. (2008). Creating world-class Universities in Japan: Policy and initiatives. Policy Futures in Education, 6(5), 629–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osaki, H. (1999). University reform 1945–1999. Tokyo: Yuhikaku. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B. (2006). Science, society and the University: A paradox of values. Social Epistemology, 20(3), 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pol, P. (2007). Le débat universitaire en France: de la montée des tensions à la reconfiguration du paysage universitaire. Revue internationale d’éducation, 45, 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIHE. (2007). Transforming Universities in Modern Japan. COE Publication Series No. 27, RIHE, Hiroshima (in Japanese).

  • Shattock, M. (2003). Managing successful Universities. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, A. (2007). Weakness of the Japanese research systems: Allocating research funding in favour of “Imperial Universities.” Shukan Toyo Keizai, 9 October 2007 issue, 48–49 (in Japanese).

  • Teichler, U. (1988). Changing patterns of the higher education system. The experience of three decades. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2004). Changing structures of the higher education systems: The increasing complexity of underlying forces. In UNESCO Forum Occasional Paper Series Paper No. 6 Diversification of Higher Education and the Changing Role of Knowledge and Research.

  • Trow M. (1974). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. In OECD (Ed.), Policies for higher education (pp. 51–101). Paris: OECD.

  • Trow, M. (2006). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: Forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. In J. Forest & A. Philip (Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp. 243–280). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ushiogi, M. (1997). Japanese graduate education and its problems. Higher Education, 34, 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2000). Managing strategy. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, L. (2007). New institutional policies for university–industry links in Japan. Research Policy, 36, 1261–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, K. (2004). Corporatization of national universities in Japan: Revolution for governance or rhetoric for downsizing? Financial Accountability & Management, 20(2), 153–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonezawa, A. (2007). Japanese flagship universities at a crossroads. Higher Education, 54(4), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous referees for very insightful comments. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 21st CHER Annual Conference “Excellence and Diversity in Higher Education. Meanings, Goals, and Instruments” held at Università degli Studi di Pavia, 11–13 September 2008. The authors appreciate comments and suggestions received during the conference, particularly, those from Ben Jongbloed, Rajani Naidoo and Rosemary Deem. The authors remain responsible for any mistakes still present in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumi Kitagawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kitagawa, F., Oba, J. Managing differentiation of higher education system in Japan: connecting excellence and diversity. High Educ 59, 507–524 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9262-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9262-5

Keywords

Navigation