Abstract
We study f(T) cosmological models inserting a non-vanishing spatial curvature and discuss its consequences on cosmological dynamics. To figure this out, a polynomial f(T) model and a double torsion model are considered. We first analyze those models with cosmic data, employing the recent surveys of Union 2.1, baryonic acoustic oscillation and cosmic microwave background measurements. We then emphasize that the two popular f(T) models enable the crossing of the phantom divide line due to dark torsion. Afterwards, we compute numerical bounds up to 3-\(\sigma \) confidence level, emphasizing the fact that \(\Omega _{k0}\) turns out to be non-compatible with zero at least at 1\(\sigma \). Moreover, we underline that, even increasing the accuracy, one cannot remove the degeneracy between our models and the \(\Lambda \)CDM paradigm. So that, we show that our treatments contain the concordance paradigm and we analyze the equation of state behaviors at different redshift domains. We also take into account gamma ray bursts and we describe the evolution of both the f(T) models with high redshift data. We calibrate the gamma ray burst measurements through small redshift surveys of data and we thus compare the main differences between non-flat and flat f(T) cosmology at different redshift ranges. We finally match the corresponding outcomes with small redshift bounds provided by cosmography. To do so, we analyze the deceleration parameters and their variations, proportional to the jerk term. Even though the two models well fit late-time data, we notice that the polynomial f(T) approach provides an effective de-Sitter phase, whereas the second f(T) framework shows analogous results compared with the \(\Lambda \)CDM predictions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The presence of matter and dark energy manifests a redshift at which dark energy starts dominating over matter, i.e. the transition redshift \(z_{tr}\).
In the framework of metric formalism.
For the sake of clearness, to avoid the a priori chosen cosmological model, one can calibrate on a model-independent local regression estimate of \(\mu (z)\) using Union supernova sample. This leads to a GRB Hubble diagram made out of 69 GRBs [42].
Hereafter, Latin indexes refer to as the tangent space, whereas Greek indexes label as manifold coordinates.
It is commonly accepted that viable alternatives to the cosmological constant \(\Lambda \) provide as a limiting case at \(z\simeq 0\), the concordance paradigm. In other words, it seems that the best models capable of describing the universe dynamics today are those which reduce to a constant dark energy term at small redshift domains.
This case is excluded by recent observations.
We assume T and \(T_0\) negative and p positive definite.
The meaning of arbitrary new “redshift” variables has been introduced to overcome the convergence problem. It deals with the fact that most of cosmic data lie on redshift domains \(z\ge 1\), while Taylor expansions are built up at \(z\simeq 0\). Introducing \(y_i\) would statistically favors the cosmographic analyses, instead of using z only.
References
Riess, A.G., et al.: Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998)
Perlmutter, S., et al.: Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999)
Spergel, D.N., et al.: ApJS 148, 175 (2003)
Spergel, D.N., et al.: ApJS 170, 377S (2007)
Tegmark, M., et al.: Phys. Rev. D. 69, 103501 (2004)
Eisenstein, D.J., et al.: Astrophys. J. 633, 560 (2005)
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Rep. 505, 59–144 (2011)
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D., Oikonomou, V.K.: Phys. Rep. 692, 1 (2017)
Capozziello, S., De Laurentis, M.: Phys. Rep. 509, 167 (2011)
Cai, Y.F., Capozziello, S., De Laurentis, M., Saridakis, E.N.: Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 106901 (2016)
Capozziello, S., Farooq, O., Luongo, O., Ratra, B.: Phys. Rev. D 90, 044016 (2014)
Sahni, V., Starobinsky, A.A.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 9, 373 (2000)
Tsujikawa, S.: Dark energy: investigation and modeling. https://doi.org/10.1007/97890481868538. arXiv:1004.1493 [astro-ph] (2010)
Caldwell, R.R., Dave, R., Steinhardt, R.J.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1582 (1998)
Caldwell, R.R.: Phys. Lett. B 545, 23 (2002)
Armendariz-Picon, C., Mukhanov, V., Steinhardt, P.J.: Phys. Rev. D 63, 103510 (2001)
Padmanabhan, T.: Phys. Rev. D 66, 021301 (2002)
Sen, A.: Phys. Scr. T 117, 70 (2005)
Feng, B., Wang, X.L., Zhang, X.M.: Phys. Lett. B 607, 35 (2005)
Elizadle, E., Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Rev. D 70, 043539 (2004)
Cognola, G., Elizalde, E., Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D., Sebastiani, L., Zerbini, S.: Phys. Rev. D 77, 046009 (2008)
Cognola, G., Elizalde, E., Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D., Zerbini, S.: Phys. Rev. D 73, 084007 (2006)
Kamenshchik, A., Moschella, U., Pasquier, V.: Phys. Lett. B 511, 265 (2001)
Bento, M.C., Bertolami, O., Sen, A.A.: Phys. Rev. D 66, 043507 (2002)
Cohen, A.G., Kaplan, D.B., Nelson, A.E.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4971 (1999)
Li, M.: Phys. Lett. B 603, 1 (2004)
Wei, H., Cai, R.G.: Phys. Lett. B 663, 1 (2008)
Wei, H., Cai, R.G.: Phys. Lett. B 660, 113 (2008)
Gao, C., Wu, F., Chen, X., Shen, Y.G.: Phys. Rev. D 79, 043511 (2009)
Felice, A.D., Tsujikawa, S.: Living Rev. Relativ. 13, 3 (2010)
De Felice, A., Mota, D.F., Tsujikawa, S.: Phys. Rev. D 81, 023532 (2010)
Farajollahi, H., Farhoudi, M., Shojaie, H.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 49(10), 2558 (2010)
Zuntz, J., Zlosnik, T.G., Bourliot, F., Ferreira, P.G., Starkman, G.D.: Phys. Rev. D 81, 104015 (2010)
La Camera, M.: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25, 781–792 (2010)
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Rev. D 68, 123512 (2003)
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Rev. D 74, 086005 (2006)
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D.: Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 4, 115–146 (2007)
Abdalla, M.C.B., Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D.: Class. Quantum Gravity 22, L35 (2005)
Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S.D.: Phys. Rev. D 77, 026007 (2008)
Bengochea, G.R.: Phys. Lett. B 695, 405–411 (2011)
Karami, K., Khaledian, M.S., Felegary, F., Azarmi, Z.: Phys. Lett. B 686, 216–220 (2010)
Cardone, V.F., Capozziello, S., Dainotti, M.G.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 400, 775–790 (2009)
Einstein, A.: Sitz. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. p. 217; ibid p. 224 (1928)
Hayashi, K., Shirafuji, T.: Phys. Rev. D. 19, 3524 (1979), Addendum-ibid. D. 24, 3312 (1982)
Einstein, A.: Translations of Einstein papers by Unzicker, A., Case, T. arXiv:physics/0503046 (2005)
Hoff da Silva, J.M., da Rocha, R.: Phys. Rev. D 81, 024021 (2010)
Ferraro, R., Fiorini, F.: Phys. Rev. D 84, 083518 (2011)
Wu, P., Yu, H.: Phys. Lett. B 703, 223–227 (2011)
Capozziello, S., Cardone, V.F., Farajollahi, H., Ravanpak, A.: Phys. Rev. D 84, 043527 (2011)
Miao, R.X., Li, M., Miao, Y.G.: JCAP 11, 033 (2011)
Wei, H., Ma, X.P., Qi, H.Y.: Phys. Lett. B 703, 74–80 (2011)
Sharif, M., Rani, S.: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26, 1657–1671 (2011)
Li, M., Miao, R.X., Miao, Y.G.: JHEP 1107, 108 (2011)
Cai, Y.F., Chen, S.H., Dent, J.B., Dutta, S., Saridakis, E.N.: Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 215011 (2011)
Li, B., Sotiriou, T.P., Barrow, J.D.: Phys. Rev. D 83, 104017 (2011)
Ferraro, R., Fiorini, F.: Phys. Lett. B 702, 75–80 (2011)
Zhang, Y., Li, H., Gong, Y., Zhu, Z.H.: JCAP 07, 015 (2011)
Bamba, K., Geng, C.Q., Lee, C.C., Luo, L.W.: JCAP 1101, 021 (2011)
Zheng, R., Huang, Q.G.: JCAP 1103, 002 (2011)
Dent, J.B., Dutta, S., Saridakis, E.N.: JCAP 1101, 009 (2011)
Bengochea, G.R.: Phys. Lett. B 695, 405–411 (2011)
Ferraro, R., Fiorini, F.: Phys. Rev. D 78, 124019 (2008)
Ulhoa, S.C., da Rocha Neto, J.F., Maluf, J.W.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 19(12), 1925–1935 (2010)
Nashed, G.G.L.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 25(14), 2883–2895 (2010)
Sharif, M., Taj, S.: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25, 221–232 (2010)
Lucas, T.G., Obukhov, Y.N., Pereira, J.G.: Phys. Rev. D 80, 064043 (2009)
Ferraro, R., Fiorini, F.: Phys. Rev. D 75, 084031 (2007)
Poplawski, N.J.: Phys. Lett. B 694, 181–185 (2010)
Wu, P., Yu, H.: Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1552 (2011)
Wu, P., Yu, H.: Phys. Lett. B 693, 415–420 (2010)
Linder, E.V.: Phys. Rev. D 80, 123528 (2009)
Bamba, K., Geng, C.Q., Lee, C.C.: JCAP 08, 021 (2010)
Ao, X.C., Li, X.Z., Xi, P.: Phys. Lett. B 694, 186–190 (2010)
Bengochea, G.R.: Phys. Lett. B 695, 405 (2011)
Bengochea, G., Ferraro, R.: Phys. Rev. D 79, 124019 (2009)
Wu, P., Yu, H.: Phys. Lett. B 692, 176–179 (2010)
Yang, R.J.: Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1797 (2011)
Huang, Q.G., Li, M.: J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08, 013 (2004)
Schaefer, B.E.: Astrophys. J. 660, 16 (2007)
Cardone, V.F., Capozziello, S., Dainotti, M.G.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 400, 775–790 (2009)
Ferraro, R., Fiorini, F.: IJMP (Conf. Ser.) 3, 227–237 (2011)
Amanullah, R., et al.: Astrophys. J. 716, 712–738 (2010)
Reid, B.A.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 404, 60–85 (2010)
Percival, W.J., et al.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 401, 2148–2168 (2010)
Wang, Y., Mukherjee, P.: Astrophys. J. 650, 1 (2006)
Bond, J.R., Efstathiou, G., Tegmark, M.: Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 291, L33 (1997)
Komatsu, E., et al.: Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192, 18 (2011)
Planck Collaboration.: P.A.R. Ade, Astron. Astrophys., 571, A22 (2014)
Acknowledgements
The work is partly supported by VEGA Grant No. 2/0009/16 and from COST Action CA15117 ”Cosmology and Astrophysics Network for Theoretical Advances and Training Actions” (CANTATA), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). S. Capozziello and O. Luongo are supported by Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN). R. Pincak would like to thank the TH division at CERN for hospitality.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Capozziello, S., Luongo, O., Pincak, R. et al. Cosmic acceleration in non-flat f(T) cosmology. Gen Relativ Gravit 50, 53 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-018-2374-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-018-2374-4