Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 67, Issue 2, pp 137–147 | Cite as

Beyond the Anglo-American hegemony in human geography: a European perspective

  • Manuel B. Aalbers
  • Ugo Rossi
Article

Abstract

Over the past five years or so, Anglo-American hegemony in human geography has been widely debated. This debate has highlighted the obstacles put in the way of the building of a more international geographical discipline. In this paper, we reflect on the possibilities and also the limitations of Europe as a context for the experimentation with a more cross-national discipline. In doing so, we notice on the one hand the increasing attention towards the Europeanisation of human geography, particularly at an institutional level, but on the other hand we also notice the lack of some basic forms and tools of communication and exchange that might facilitate the mobilisation of scholars around the ‘European project’. The paper tries to offer a contribution to this issue by discussing the ways in which a European journal of human geography might be conceived and also concretely organised. In this respect the paper takes into account issues of language, access to scientific knowledge and recognition of cultural and academic diversities.

Keywords

Academic publishing Anglo-American hegemony Collaborative research European geography Language Post-national writing Europe 

Notes

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this paper was presented to the 4th International Conference of Critical Geography, Mexico City, January 2005, in the session “Geographical concepts in action: critical perspectives and histories”. The authors thank participants in the conference for their encouraging and stimulating observations. The paper has enormously benefited from suggestions and comments made by Sheila Hones on various early drafts. The authors would like also to acknowledge the comments of Justus Uitermark. Usual disclaimers apply.

References

  1. Aalbers, M. B. (2004). Creative destruction through the Anglo-American hegemony: A non-Anglo-American view on publications, referees and language. Area, 36, 319–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aalbers, M.B., & Rossi, U. (2007). A coming community: young geographers coping with multi-tier spaces of academic publishing across Europe. Social & Cultural Geography, 8, in press.Google Scholar
  3. Amin, A. (2004). Multi-ethnicity and the idea of Europe. Theory, Culture & Society, 21, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baber, Z. (2003). Provincial universalism: The landscape of knowledge production in an era of globalization. Current Sociology, 51, 615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (2004). Der Kosmopolitische Blick. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, L. D. (2001). Masculinism, emplacement, and positionality in peer review. Professional Geographer, 53, 511–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg, L. D., & Kearns, R. A. (1998). America unlimited. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16, 128–132.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (2002). Les conditions sociales de la circulation internationale des idées. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 145, 3–9.Google Scholar
  9. Capel, H. (1981). Filosofía y ciencia en la geografía contemporánea. Barcanova, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  10. Cusset, F. (2003). French theory: Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze & Cie et les mutations de la vie intellectuelle aux Étas-Unis La Découverte, Paris.Google Scholar
  11. De Swaan, A. (2001). Words of the world. The global language system. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Derrida, J. (1991). L’autre cap. Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris.Google Scholar
  13. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space (2003). Guest editorials, 21, 131–168.Google Scholar
  14. European Urban and Regional Studies (2004). Euro commentaries themed section, 11, 335–381.Google Scholar
  15. Farinelli, F. (2003). Geografia Un’introduzione ai modelli del mondo. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  16. Froelich, A. (2003). New legislation advocates free access to scientific publications, but at what cost? BioScience, 53, 804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garcia-Ramon, M. D. (2003). Globalization and international geography: The questions of languages and scholarly traditions. Progress in Human Geography, 27, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geoforum (2004). The spaces of critical geography. 35, 523–558.Google Scholar
  19. Gregson, N., Simonsen, K., & Vaiou, D. (2003). Writing (across) Europe: On writing spaces and writing practices. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gutiérrez, J., & López-Nieva, P. (2001). Are international journals of human geography really international? Progress in Human Geography, 25, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris, C. (2002). English as international language in geography: Development and limitations. The Geographical Review, 91, 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hudson, R., & Williams, A. M. (2004). European voices: Towards the internationalization of academic discourse. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11, 355–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnston, R. J., & Sidaway, J. (2004a). Geography and geographers. Anglo-American human geography since 1945 (6th ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  24. Johnston, R. J., & Sidaway, J. (2004b). The trans-Atlantic connection: ‘Anglo-American’ geography reconsidered. GeoJournal, 59, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kitchin, R. (2003). Cuestionando y desetabilizando la hegemonía angloamericana y del inglés en geografía. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 42, 17–36.Google Scholar
  26. Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature, 411, 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lévy, J. (1998). Europe. Une géographie (2nd ed.). Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  28. Minca, C. (2000). Venetian geographical praxis. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 285–289.Google Scholar
  29. Mitchell, K. (2003). Cultural geographies of transnationality. In: K. Anderson, M. Damosh, S. Pile, & N. Thrift (Eds.), Handbook of cultural geography (pp. 74–87). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Moss, P., Berg, L. D., & Desbiens, C. (2002). The political economy of publishing in Geography. ACME, 1, 1–7.Google Scholar
  31. Odlyzko, A. (2001). The Public Library of Science and the ongoing revolution in scholarly communication. Nature Web Forum http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/odlyzko.html Accessed 15 October 2004.Google Scholar
  32. Olds, K. (2001). Practices for ‘process geographies’: A view from within and outside the periphery. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paasi, A. (2005). Globalization, academic capitalism and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces. Environment and Planning A, 37, 769–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pollock, S., Bhabha, H. K., Breckenridge, C. A., & Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Cosmopolitanisms. Public Culture, 12, 577–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pratt, G., & Yeoh, B. (2003). Transnational (counter) topographies. Gender, Place and Culture, 10, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rifkin, J. (2004). The European dream. How Europe’s vision of the future is quietly eclipsing the American dream. New York: Teacher/Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. Robinson, J. (2003). Postcolonialising geography: Tactics and pitfalls. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 24, 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2004). On English as a vehicle to preserve geographical diversity. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Short, J. R., Boniche, A., Kim, Y., & Li, P. L. (2001). Cultural globalization, global English, and geography journals. Professional Geographer, 53, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simonsen, K. (2002). Editorial: Global-local ambivalence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 27, 391–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Staszak, J. F., Collignon, B., Chivallon, C., Debarbieux, B., Géneau de Lamarlière, I., & Hancock, C. (2001). Géographies anglo-saxonnes. Tendances contemporaines. Belin, Paris.Google Scholar
  43. Van Parijs, P. (2004). Europe’s linguistic challenge. European Journal of Sociology, 45, 111–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yeung, H. W. C. (2001). Redressing the geographical bias in social science knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 33, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.University ’L’Orientale’ of NaplesNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations