Skip to main content
Log in

Treatise on Winkler Modulus of Subgrade Reaction and Its Estimation for Improved Soil–Structure Interaction Analysis

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper pertains to the development of a new relationship expressing the Winkler modulus of subgrade reaction as a function of elastic parameters such as the modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of the foundation soil, and the relative rigidity of the foundation soil and the beam resting over the same. It ensures that the maximum values of beam deflection and bending moment computed by using both the theory of elastic continuum and lumped parameter modeling are either identical or very close to each other. In this respect the developed expression can be construed to be superior to those proposed by Biot and Vesic, which respectively predict correct values for only one of the quantities (either maximum bending moment or maximum deflection). In addition, the proposed model for subgrade modulus is applicable to multiple load conditions as well unlike the other two approaches as reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

(Reproduced with permission from Smith and Pole 1980)

Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albet P, Kovacs M (2003) Periodica Polytechnica Ser. Civ Eng 42(2):169–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Allotey N, El Nagger MH (2008) Generalized dynamic Winkler model for nonlinear soil–structure interaction analysis. Can Geotech J 45:560–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biot MA (1937) Bending of an infinite beam on an elastic foundation. J Appl Mech (Trans ASME) 4:A1–A7

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Curras CJ, Kutter BL, Wilson DW, Abghari A (1999) A seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analysis. J Geotech Geoenvironm Eng 125:750–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowels JE (2001) Foundation analysis and design. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown PT (1973) Strip footings with concentrated loads on deep elastic foundations. University of Sydney, School of Civil Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekaran VS (2001) Numerical and centrifuge modelling in soil structure interaction. Indian Geotech J 31(1):1–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Daloglu AT, Vallabhan CVG (2000) Values of k for slab on winkler foundation. J Geotech Geoenvironm Eng ASCE 126(5):463–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey A (2009) Nonlinearly elastic and viscoelastic, unreinforced and reinforced foundation beds: modeling and model parameter estimation. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India

  • Fox RL (1971) Optimization methods for engineering design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetenyi M (1946) Beams on elastic foundation. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Iskander GM, Gabr RH (2009) Soil-pipe interaction due to tunneling: comparision between Winkler and elastic continuum solutions, internet

  • Kerr MG (1965) The mechanical effects of the gravid uterus in late pregnancy. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 72(4):513–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klar A, Vorster TEB, Soga K, Mair RJ (2004) Soil-pipe-tunnel interaction: comparisonbetween winkler and elastic continuum solutions. Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK, pp 1–14

  • Madhav MR, Poorooshasb HB (1989) Modified Pasternak model for reinforced soil. Math Comput Model 12(12):1505–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern NR, Price VE (1967) A numerical method for solving the equations of stability of general slip surfaces. Comput J 9(4):388–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast LJ, Gavin K (2016) A comparison of initial stiffness formulations for small-strain soil–pile dynamic Winkler modelling. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 81:27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadrekarimi J, Akbarzad M (2009) Comparative study of methods of determination of coefficient of subgrade reaction. Electron J Geotech Eng 14(s1–6):45–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Sall OA, Fall M, Berthaud Y, Ba M (2013) Influence of the elastic modulus of the soil and concrete foundation on displacements of a mat foundation. Open J Civ Eng 3:228–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott RF (1981) Foundation analysis, vol 07632. Prentice–Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, pp 141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvadurai APS (1979) Elastic analysis of soil-foundation interaction development in geotechnical engineering, vol 17. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla SK, Chandra S (1994) Generalized mechanical model for geosynthetic-reinforced foundation soil. Geotext Geomembr 13:813–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GN, Pole EL (1980) Elements of foundation design. Granada Publishing Limited-Technical Books Division, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1955) Evalution of conefficients of subgrade reaction. Geotechnique 5(4):297–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesic A (1961) Bending of beams resting on isotropic elastic solid. J Eng Mech Div Proc ASCE 87(EM2):35–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin JH (2000) Comparative modeling study of reinforced beam on elastic foundation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126:265–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prabir K. Basudhar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basudhar, P.K., Yadav, S.K. & Basudhar, A. Treatise on Winkler Modulus of Subgrade Reaction and Its Estimation for Improved Soil–Structure Interaction Analysis. Geotech Geol Eng 36, 3091–3109 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0523-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0523-x

Keywords

Navigation