Skip to main content
Log in

Plasticity and ductile fracture modeling of an Al–Si–Mg die-cast alloy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The plastic anisotropy and ductile fracture behavior of an Al–Si–Mg die-cast alloy (AA365-T7, or Aural-2) is probed using a combination of experiments and analysis. The plastic anisotropy is assessed using uniaxial tension, plane-strain tension and disc compression experiments, which are then used to calibrate the Yld2004-3D anisotropic yield criterion. The fracture behavior is investigated using notched tension, central hole and shear specimens, with the latter employing a geometry that was custom-designed for this material. Digital image correlation is used to assess the full strain fields for these experiments. However, fracture is expected to initiate at the through-thickness mid-plane of the specimens and thus it cannot be measured directly from experiments. Instead, the stresses and strains at the onset of fracture are estimated using finite element modeling. The loading path and the resulting fracture locus were found to be sensitive to the yield criterion employed, which underscores the importance of an adequate modeling of plastic anisotropy in ductile fracture studies. Based on the finite element modeling, the fracture locus is represented with three common criteria (Oyane, Johnson–Cook and Hosford–Coulomb), as well as a newly proposed one as the linear combination of the first two. However, beyond that, it is still questionable if all of these experiments are probing the same fracture locus, since the predicted loading paths of notched tension specimens are highly evolving compared to those of central hole and shear ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support of this work from an industrial sponsor is acknowledged with thanks. We also wish to thank Scott Campbell for his help with preparing some of the specimens. Finally, it is a pleasure to acknowledge the help of 2nd Lt. Moritz Dirian, a visiting student from Universität der Bundeswehr, Munich, Germany in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yannis P. Korkolis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

The microstructure images of the die-cast alloy taken using the optical microscope are shown in Fig. 19. The specimen surface was polished mechanically with sheet sandpaper up to 2400-grit, and the precipitation on the surface was naturally oxidized by water.

Fig. 19
figure 19

Microstructure images of AA365-T7 die cast alloy at two different magnifications

Appendix B

The specimen geometries for plasticity specimens are shown in Fig. 20.

Fig. 20
figure 20

Specimen geometries for plasticity specimens (units \(=\) mm)

Appendix C

The specimen geometries for fracture specimens are shown in Fig. 21, with a zoomed-in gage section for SH specimen in Fig. 22.

Fig. 21
figure 21

Specimen geometries for fracture specimens (units \(=\) mm)

Appendix D

The yield locus for Yld2000-2D and Yld2004-3D are shown together in Fig. 23.

Fig. 22
figure 22

Detailed geometry of the notch section for the SH specimen (units \(=\) mm)

Fig. 23
figure 23

Comparison of yield locus predicted by Yld2000-2D and Yld2004-3D criteria

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baral, M., Ha, J. & Korkolis, Y.P. Plasticity and ductile fracture modeling of an Al–Si–Mg die-cast alloy. Int J Fract 216, 101–121 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-019-00345-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-019-00345-1

Keywords

Navigation