Skip to main content
Log in

On the Problem of Initial Conditions for Inflation

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I review the present status of the problem of initial conditions for inflation and describe several ways to solve this problem for many popular inflationary models, including the recent generation of the models with plateau potentials favored by cosmological observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guth, A.H.: The inflationary universe: a possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Linde, A.D.: A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems. Phys. Lett. 108B, 389 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Linde, A.D.: Chaotic inflation. Phys. Lett. B 129, 177 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Linde, A.D.: Initial conditions for inflation. Phys. Lett. 162B, 281 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Linde, A.D.: Particle physics and inflationary cosmology. Contemp. Concepts Phys. 5, 1 (1990). arxiv: hep-th/0503203

    Google Scholar 

  6. Linde, A.D.: Eternally existing self-reproducing chaotic inflationary universe. Phys. Lett. B 175, 395 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ade, P.A.R., et al.: [Planck collaboration], Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A20 (2016). arXiv:1502.02114 [astro-ph.CO]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goncharov, A.B., Linde, A.D.: Chaotic inflation in supergravity. Phys. Lett. B 139, 27 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Starobinsky, A.A.: A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity. Phys. Lett. B 91, 99 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Salopek, D.S., Bond, J.R., Bardeen, J.M.: Designing density fluctuation spectra in inflation. Phys. Rev. D 40, 1753 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bezrukov, F.L., Shaposhnikov, M.: The standard model Higgs boson as the inflaton. Phys. Lett. B 659, 703 (2008). arXiv:0710.3755 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kallosh, R., Linde, A.: Universality class in conformal inflation. JCAP 1307, 002 (2013). arXiv:1306.5220 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrara, S., Kallosh, R., Linde, A., Porrati, M.: Minimal supergravity models of inflation. Phys. Rev. D 88(8), 085038 (2013). arXiv:1307.7696 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kallosh, R., Linde, A., Roest, D.: Superconformal inflationary \(\alpha \)-attractors. JHEP 1311, 198 (2013). arXiv:1311.0472 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Cecotti, S., Kallosh, R.: Cosmological attractor models and higher curvature supergravity. JHEP 1405, 114 (2014). arXiv:1403.2932 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Galante, M., Kallosh, R., Linde, A., Roest, D.: Unity of cosmological inflation attractors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(14), 141302 (2015). arXiv:1412.3797 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kallosh, R., Linde, A.: Escher in the sky. C. R. Phys. 16, 914 (2015). arXiv:1503.06785 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ijjas, A., Steinhardt, P.J., Loeb, A.: Inflationary paradigm in trouble after Planck 2013. Phys. Lett. B 723, 261 (2013). arXiv:1304.2785 [astro-ph.CO]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ijjas, A., Steinhardt, P.J., Loeb, A.: Pop goes the universe. Sci. Am. 316, 32 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Linde, A.D.: Creation of a compact topologically nontrivial inflationary universe. JCAP 0410, 004 (2004). arxiv: hep-th/0408164

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Linde, A.: Inflationary Cosmology after Planck 2013, Les Houches lectures: 100e Ecole d’Ete de Physique: Post-Planck Cosmology 8 Jul–2 Aug 2013. Les Houches, France (2013). arXiv:1402.0526 [hep-th]

  22. Carrasco, J.J.M., Kallosh, R., Linde, A.: Cosmological attractors and initial conditions for inflation. Phys. Rev. D 92(6), 063519 (2015). arXiv:1506.00936 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. East, W.E., Kleban, M., Linde, A., Senatore, L.: Beginning inflation in an inhomogeneous universe. JCAP 1609(09), 010 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/09/010. arXiv:1511.05143 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kleban, M., Senatore, L.: Inhomogeneous anisotropic cosmology. JCAP 1610(10), 022 (2016). arXiv:1602.03520 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Clough, K., Lim, E.A., DiNunno, B.S., Fischler, W., Flauger, R., Paban, S.: Robustness of inflation to inhomogeneous initial conditions. JCAP 1709(09), 025 (2017). arXiv:1608.04408 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Kallosh, R., Linde, A.: Planck, LHC, and \(\alpha \)-attractors. Phys. Rev. D 91, 083528 (2015). arXiv:1502.07733 [astro-ph.CO]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kallosh, R., Linde, A.: Cosmological attractors and asymptotic freedom of the inflaton field. JCAP 1606(06), 047 (2016). arXiv:1604.00444 [hep-th]

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Zeldovich, Y.B., Starobinsky, A.A.: Quantum creation of a universe in a nontrivial topology. Sov. Astron. Lett. 10, 135 (1984)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Heckmann, O., Schucking, E.: In: Flugge, S. (ed.) Handbuch der Physik, vol. 53, p. 515. Springer, Berlin (1959)

  30. Ellis, G.F.: Topology and cosmology. Gen. Rel. Grav. 2, 7 (1971)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Gott, J.R.: Chaotic cosmologies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 193, 153 (1980)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Lockhart, C.N., Misra, B., Prigogine, I.: Geodesic instability and internal time in relativistic cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 25, 921 (1982)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Fagundes, H.V.: Compactification of Friedmann’s hyperbolic model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 517 (1983)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Cornish, N.J., Spergel, D.N., Starkman, G.D.: Does chaotic mixing facilitate \(\Omega < 1\) inflation? Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 215 (1996). arXiv:astro-ph/9601034

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Coule, D.H., Martin, J.: Quantum cosmology and open universes. Phys. Rev. D 61, 063501 (2000). arXiv:gr-qc/9905056

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. DeWitt, B.S.: Quantum theory of gravity. 1. The canonical theory. Phys. Rev. 160, 1113 (1967)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Vilenkin, A.: Creation of universes from nothing. Phys. Lett. 117B, 25 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hartle, J.B., Hawking, S.W.: Wave function of the universe. Phys. Rev. D 28, 2960 (1983)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Linde, A.D.: The inflationary universe. Rept. Prog. Phys. 47, 925 (1984)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Vilenkin, A.: Quantum creation of universes. Phys. Rev. D 30, 509 (1984)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to the organizers of the conference “Black holes, Gravitational Waves and Spacetime Singularities” for their hospitality. This work is supported by SITP and by the US National Science Foundation Grant PHY-1720397.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrei Linde.

Additional information

Based on an invited talk at the conference “Black Holes, Gravitational Waves and Spacetime Singularities,” Specola Vaticana 9–12 May 2017.

Appendix: Quantum Creation of Universes with Non-trivial Topology

Appendix: Quantum Creation of Universes with Non-trivial Topology

In the main body of the paper, I was using simple intuitive arguments not requiring familiarity with the tools of quantum cosmology. However, quantum cosmology [36] and the theory of quantum creation of the universe “from nothing” [37,38,39,40] allows to look at the problem of initial conditions from a different perspective.

Most of the related investigations described creation of a closed universe. But an initial size of a closed inflationary universe studied in [37,38,39,40] should be greater than \(H^{-1}\), which is five orders of magnitude greater than the Planck length in the models considered above. In some cases, this may lead to exponential suppression of the probability of quantum creation of such universes, but this problem can be solved using anthropic considerations [40]. There is no exponential suppression of the probability of quantum creation of an open or flat compact universe [20, 28, 35]. I will briefly remind the corresponding results, following [20].

Consider a flat compact universe having the topology of a torus, \(S_1^3\),

$$\begin{aligned} ds^2 = dt^2 -a_i^2(t)\,dx_i^2 \end{aligned}$$
(21)

with identification \(x_i+1 = x_i\) for each of the three dimensions. We will assume for simplicity that \(a_1 = a_2 = a_3 = a(t)\). In this case the curvature of the universe and the Einstein equations written in terms of a(t) will be the same as in the infinite flat Friedmann universe with metric \(ds^2 = dt^2 -a^2(t)\,d\mathbf{x^2}\). In our notation, the scale factor a(t) is equal to the size of the universe in Planck units \(M_{p}^{{-1}} = 1\).

In order to derive the Wheeler–DeWitt equation [36] for the compact flat toroidal universe, one should first consider the gravitational action

$$\begin{aligned} S = \int dt\, d^3 x\,\sqrt{-g}\,\left( -{1\over 2}{R} +{1\over 2}\partial _{\mu }\phi \,\partial ^{\mu }\phi -V(\phi )\right) \end{aligned}$$
(22)

and take into account that the volume of the 3D box is equal to \(a^{3}\). Let us assume for a moment that \(\phi \) is constant, which is the case if the field stays at the top of the potential, or at the dS plateau, as in the models which we discussed here. In this case one can represent the effective Lagrangian for the scale factor as a function of a and \(\dot{a}\),

$$\begin{aligned} L(a) = -3\dot{a}^{2} a - a^{3}V\ . \end{aligned}$$
(23)

Finding the corresponding Hamiltonian and using the Hamiltonian constraint \(H \Psi (a) =0\) yields the Wheeler–DeWitt equation

$$\begin{aligned} \left[ {d^2\over da^2} +12 a^4 V\right] \Psi (a) = 0 \end{aligned}$$
(24)

For large a, the solution of Eq. (24) can be easily obtained in the WKB (semiclassical) approximation, \(\Psi \sim a^{{-1}}\exp \left[ \pm i {2a^3\sqrt{V}\over \sqrt{3}}\right] \); positive sign corresponds to an expanding universe. This approximation breaks down at \(a \lesssim V^{-1/6}\). At that time the size of the universe is much greater than the Planck scale, but much smaller than the Hubble scale \(H^{-1}\sim V^{-1/2}\). The meaning of this result, to be discussed below in a more detailed way, is that at \(a \gg V^{-1/6}\) the effective action corresponding to the expanding universe is very large, and the universe can be described in terms of classical space and time. Meanwhile at \(a \lesssim V^{-1/6}\), the effective action becomes small, the classical description breaks down, and quantum uncertainty becomes large. In other words, contrary to the usual expectations, at \(a \lesssim V^{-1/6}\) one cannot describe the universe in terms of a classical space-time even though the size of the universe at \(a \sim V^{-1/6}\) is much greater than the Planck size, and the density of matter as well as the curvature scalar in this regime remains small, \(R = 4 V \ll 1\).

The general solution for Eq. (24) can be represented as a sum of two Bessel functions:

$$\begin{aligned} \Psi (a) =\beta \sqrt{a} \left( \mathrm{J}_{-{1\over 6}}\left( {2\sqrt{V} a^3\over \sqrt{3}}\right) + \gamma \, \mathrm{J}_{{1\over 6}}\left( {2\sqrt{V} a^3\over \sqrt{3}}\right) \right) , \end{aligned}$$
(25)

where \(\beta \) and \(\gamma \) are some complex constants, see Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Two eigenmodes of the Wheeler–DeWitt equation for the wave function of the flat compact toroidal universe. The scale factor a is shown in units of \(V^{-1/6}\)

Figure 5 confirms that the WKB approximation is not valid at small a, and the “cosmic clock” starts ticking only at \(a>V^{-1/6}\).

One can provide an alternative interpretation of this result, without invoking the Wheeler–DeWitt equation. By substituting the classical solution \(a = e^{Ht}\) into the effective Lagrangian (23), one finds that the total action of the universe is proportional to \(\sqrt{V} a^{3}(t) \sim \sqrt{V} a^{3}(t) e^{{3Ht}}.\)

For \(a < V^{-1/6}\), the action is smaller than 1, so the wave function does not oscillate. Not surprisingly, the total energy of the universe at the critical time when a becomes equal to \(V^{-1/6}\) is of the same order as Hawking temperature \(T_{H} =O(H)\), which corresponds to the typical energy of a single quantum fluctuation in dS universe. Thus the universe gradually emerges from nothing, and its wave function does not oscillate until its total energy reaches O(H).

Once the universe grows larger than \(a \sim V^{-1/6}\), its action rapidly becomes exponentially large, classical description of the new-born universe becomes possible, and its topology becomes irrelevant due to the magic of inflation.

Of course, if it is so easy to create a homogeneous universe, it may not be too difficult to create an inhomogeneous universe as well. The most important conclusion of the investigation performed in [20, 28, 35] is that the probability of quantum creation of a compact homogeneous inflationary universe with non-trivial topology is not exponentially suppressed. Meanwhile the main result obtained recently in [22, 23] is that even if the new-born universe is grossly inhomogeneous, it typically becomes homogeneous at later stages of the cosmological evolution.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Linde, A. On the Problem of Initial Conditions for Inflation. Found Phys 48, 1246–1260 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-018-0177-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-018-0177-9

Keywords

Navigation