Skip to main content
Log in

Physical Time and Thermal Clocks

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I discuss the concept of time in physics. I consider the thermal time hypothesis and I claim that thermal clocks and atomic clocks measure different physical times, whereby thermal time and relativistic time are not compatible with each other. This hypothesis opens the possibility of a new foundation of the theory of physical time, and new perspectives in theoretical and philosophical researches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The measure of durations in Newton is relative and approximate as obtained through devices that simulate the flow of absolute time, by definition mathematic, then ideal.

  2. As remarkable we point out the experiments performed by Hafele and Keating [7], through four cesium clocks flying on commercial airlines around the Earth (two to the east and two to the west), and by Alley [8], through three rubidium clocks in flight along a closed path.

  3. To paraphrase the title of a recent Rovelli’s essay [10], we can say that the irreversible reality of time appears in thermodynamical form. It must be emphasized that one of the objectives of theoretical and experimental research should be the description and understanding of reality as it appears, recognizing, in every abstract theorisation, a potential reductionist risk, wherever we want to explain the irreversibility of physical phenomena through the reversible phenomena that seem to constitute their elementary structure.

References

  1. Rovelli, C.: Forget time. Found. Phys. 41, 1475 (2011)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, H.: The behaviour of rods and clocks in general relativity, and the meaning of the metric field, arXiv:0911.4440v1 (2009)

  3. Barbour, J.: The nature of time, arXiv:0903.3489 (2008)

  4. Rovelli, C.: Quantum Gravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinetti, P.: Emergence of time in quantum gravity: is time necessarily flowing? Kronoscope 13, 67–84 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Connes, A., Rovelli, C.: Von Neumann algebra automorphisms and time-thermodynamics relation in generally covariant quantum theories. Class. Quantum Grav. 11, 2899–2917 (1994)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hafele, J.C., Keating, R.E.: Around-the-world atomic clocks: predicted relativistic time gains. Science 177, 166–168 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alley, C.O.: Relativity and clocks, Proceedings of XXXIII Annual Symposium on Frequency Control pp. 4–39, doi:10.1109/FREQ.1979.200296 (1979)

  9. Borghi, C.: Hypothesis about the nature of time and rate of clocks. Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie 38, 167 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Rovelli, C.: La realtà non è come ci appare (Reality is not as it appears), Raffaello Cortina Editore (2014)

Download references

Acknowledgments

A special thanks to Silvio Bergia (University of Bologna) for his precious and concrete attention to the development of these ideas. Thanks also to Carlo Rovelli and Julian Barbour for having discussed some aspects of this theoretical analysis of the question of time.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Borghi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borghi, C. Physical Time and Thermal Clocks. Found Phys 46, 1374–1379 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0030-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0030-y

Keywords

Navigation