Skip to main content
Log in

On the Sharpness of Localization of Individual Events in Space and Time

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of event provides the essential bridge from the realm of virtuality of the quantum state to real phenomena in space and time. We ask how much we can gather from existing theory about the localization of an event and point out that decoherence and coarse graining—though important—do not suffice for a consistent interpretation without the additional principle of random realization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Best known is the suggestion by David Bohm [3]. I would also like to mention the work of Fritz Bopp in the years between 1949 and 1955 [4].

References

  1. Bohr, N.: In: Schilpp, P.A., Einstein, A. (eds.) Philosopher-Scientist. Tudor, New York (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bohr, N.: Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1934)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohm, D.: A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables I. Phys. Rev. 85, 166–179 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bopp, F.: Würfelbrettspiele, deren Steine sich annähernd quantenmechanisch bewegen. Z. Naturforsch. 10a, 783–789 (1955)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heisenberg, W.: Die Physikalischen Prinzipien der Quantentheorie. Hirzl, Leipzig (1930)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Griffiths, R.B.: Consistent Quantum Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bell, J.: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clauser, J.F., Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Holt, R.A.: Proposed experiment to test local hidden variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804–1807 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kochen, S., Specker, E.P.: The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87 (1967)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Maxwell, N.: Is the quantum world composed of propensitons. In: Suarez, M. (ed.) Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics, pp. 221–243. Springer, Dodrecht (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Haag, R.: Quantum physics and reality. In: Conference Proceedings Gargnano 2000, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 56a, pp. 76–82 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I want to thank Heide Narnhofer for many discussions and encouragement during several years. I am greatly indebted to Detlev Buchholz and Erhard Seiler for essential criticism and vital assistance during the last stages of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudolf Haag.

Appendix: Non-uniqueness of Decomposition of a General State—Effective Coherence Length

Appendix: Non-uniqueness of Decomposition of a General State—Effective Coherence Length

Let us start from a pure state with almost sharp momentum with mean value \(\bar{p}\), mean position \(\bar{x}\) and momentum uncertainty γ −1/2 described by the wave function in momentum space (we omit normalization factors)

$$ \psi_1(p)= \mathrm{e}^{-\frac{\gamma}{2}(p-\bar{p})^2+\mathrm {i}p\bar{x}}, $$
(40)

or in x space

$$ \psi_1(x)= \mathrm{e}^{-\frac{1}{2\gamma}(x-\bar{x})^2+\mathrm {i}\bar{p} x}. $$
(41)

We consider a mixture of such states corresponding to an ignorance of the precise values \(\bar{p}\) and \(\bar{x}\) expressed by the weight function \(\mathrm{e}^{-\frac{\beta}{2}(\bar{p} -\hat{p})^{2}-\frac{1}{2\alpha }{\bar{x}}^{2}}\). The statistical matrix in x space is \(\langle x'|\rho_{1} |x\rangle = \int\mathrm{d}\bar{x} \mathrm{d}\bar{p} \mathrm{e}^{-K_{x}}\) with

$$ K_x= \frac{\bar{x}^2}{2\alpha} + \frac{\beta(\bar{p} -\hat{p})^2}{2} +\frac{1}{2\gamma}{ \bigl[(x-\bar{x})^2+\bigl(x'-\bar{x}\bigr)^2 \bigr]} - \mathrm{i}\bar{p} \bigl(x-x'\bigr). $$
(42)

Integration over \(\bar{p}\) gives \(\langle x'|\rho|x\rangle= \int\mathrm{d}\bar{x} \mathrm {e}^{-K_{1}}\) with

$$ K_1 = \frac{\bar{x}^2}{2\alpha}+\frac{(x-x')^2}{2\beta'}+ \frac{1}{\gamma} \biggl(\bar{x}-\frac{x+x'}{2} \biggr)^2- \mathrm {i}\hat{p} \bigl(x-x'\bigr) $$
(43)

with

$$ \frac{1}{\beta'}=\frac{1}{\beta}+\frac{1}{2\gamma}. $$
(44)

The same statistical matrix is obtained if we start from a pure state given by the wave function in x space

$$ \psi_2(x)=\mathrm{e}^{-\frac{(x-\bar{x})^2}{\beta'}+\mathrm{i}\hat {p} x} $$
(45)

and consider the mixture given with a weight factor \(\exp(-\frac{\bar{x}^{2}}{2\alpha'})\). It leads at first sight to the following expression for the statistical matrix

$$ \langle x'|\rho_2 |x \rangle = \int\mathrm{d} \bar{x} \mathrm{e}^{-K_2} $$
(46)

with

$$ K_2=\frac{\bar{x}^2}{2\alpha'}+\frac{1}{2\beta'}\bigl(x-x' \bigr)^2 +\frac{1}{2\beta'} \biggl(\bar{x}- \frac{x+x'}{2} \biggr)^2 -\mathrm {i}\hat{p}\bigl(x-x'\bigr). $$
(47)

After integration over \(\bar{x}\) we see that ρ 1=ρ 2 provided

$$ 2\alpha+\gamma= 2\alpha'+\frac{\beta'}{2}. $$
(48)

If γβ, in the first version we then have a very large coherent extension γ 1/2 of the pure components. In the second version the effective coherence length β1/2 is much smaller corresponding to the much larger subjective ignorance of the momentum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haag, R. On the Sharpness of Localization of Individual Events in Space and Time. Found Phys 43, 1295–1313 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-013-9747-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-013-9747-z

Keywords

Navigation