Abstract
We study a model proposed by Liboff (Found. Phys. Lett. 10:89, 1997) to violate the second law of thermodynamics. Discs are moving without friction in three connected channels inclined by π/3 with respect to each other. Based on the geometry considerations, it was argued that eventually all the discs end up in the middle channel regardless of their initial positions. This would mean a decrease of the entropy of the system and violation of the second law. We argue that no such anomalous behavior occurs in the system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., Sands, M.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1965)
Szilard, L.: Über die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen. Z. Phys. 53, 840–856 (1929)
Bennett, C.H.: Demons, engines, and the 2nd law. Sci. Am. 257, 108–116 (1987)
Landauer, R.: Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM J. Res. Dev. 5, 183–191 (1961)
Leff, H.S., Rex, A.F.: Resource letter MD-1: Maxwell’s demon. Am. J. Phys. 58, 201–209 (1990)
Maruyama, K., Nori, F., Vedral, V.: Colloquium: The physics of Maxwell’s demon and information. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1–23 (2009)
Jacobs, K.: Second law of thermodynamics and quantum feedback control: Maxwell’s demon with weak measurements. Phys. Rev. A 80, 012322 (2009)
Liboff, R.L.: Maxwell’s demon and the second law of thermodynamics. Found. Phys. Lett. 10, 89–92 (1997)
Čápek, V., Sheehan, D.P.: Challenges to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Theory and Experiment. Springer, Dordrecht (2005)
Sinai, Ya.G.: On the foundation of the ergodic hypothesis for a dynamical system of statistical mechanics. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 153, 1261–1264 (1963) (English version: Soviet Math. Doklady 4, 1818–1822 (1963))
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Opatrný, T., Mišáková, Z. Exorcising Maxwell’s Demon from Liboff’s Three-Channel Conundrum. Found Phys 41, 261–269 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9505-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-010-9505-4